Some problems of rehabilitation institute in Russian criminal process
(186-189)

More about authors
Gamidov Rinat T. Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Criminal Law
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Annotation:
Background. The article investigates the problems of legal regulation of various aspects of the institute rehabilitation of persons affected by the illegal or unjustified prosecutions. Also highlighted the issue of compensation rehabilitated amounts paid for legal assistance. Model. Are analyzed Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the payment of the amount paid by the defenders of acquitted persons, due to the fact that more and more often these rules are interpreted not in favor of the already victims of violations of their rights, as well as expanded the list of grounds and terms persons entitled to rehabilitation. Conclusion. Identified common errors in law enforcement in determining the amount to be reimbursed harm suggested solutions. State should fully compensate the damage caused to the property rehabilitated persons, without reservation: expenses incurred personally rehabilitated or at the request of another person.
How to Cite:
Gamidov R.T., (2014), SOME PROBLEMS OF REHABILITATION INSTITUTE IN RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian legislation, 6: 186-189.
Reference list:
Konstitutsiya RF. M. Izd-vo Slovo , 2014. - 94 S.
Ugolovno-protsessualnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 28.06.2014). M. Izd-vo Viktoriya plyus , 2014. - 126 S.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF . № 6, iyun, 2013. S. 29.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF . № 8, avgust, 2010. S. 37 - 38.
Gulyaev A.P. Vozmeshchenie vreda: mezhotraslevoy aspekt i aktualnye problemy // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 5. S. 46 - 48.
Dikarev I. Rezhim blagopriyatstvovaniya reabilitatsii v ugolovnom protsesse // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 4. S. 85 - 89.
Kommentariy k ch. 1 st. 48 Konstitutsii RF // Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod obshch. red. L.V. Lazareva. OOO Novaya pravovaya kultura , 2007
Korchagina L.I. O nekotorykh aspektakh soderzhaniya ponyatiya Reabilitatsiya v otechestvennom zakonodatelstve i yuridicheskoy literature // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. № 5 2013 g. S. 271
Makovskiy A.L. Grazhdanskaya otvetstvennost gosudarstva za akty vlasti // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossii. Problemy. Teoriya. Praktika. M., 1998. S. 67 - 112; Mikhaylenko O.V. O yuridicheskoy prirode otnosheniy po vozmeshcheniyu vreda reabilitirovannomu // YUrist. 2006. S. 4 - 9.
Makarova O.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie instituta reabilitatsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5. S. 30 - 36.
Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federalnomu zakonu ot 31 maya 2002 g. № 63-FZ Ob advokatskoy deyatelnosti i advokature v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod obshch. red. dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. A.G. Kuchereny. M.: Delovoy dvor, 2009.
Popov V.S. Reabilitatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse: o ee sushchnosti i soderzhanii. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. № 5 2012 g. S. 196
KHimicheva O.V., Bazhanov A.V. Problemy vozmeshcheniya reabilitirovannomu summ, vyplachennykh za okazanie yuridicheskoy pomoshchi // YUridicheskiy mir. 2010. N 5. S. 60 - 64.
Keywords:
rehabilitation, criminal prosecution, acquittal, termination of a criminal case, property damage, rehabilitation, criminal prosecution, acquittal, termination of criminal proceedings, property damage.