PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS
( Pp. 297-301)
More about authors
Firsov Sergey Nikolaevich.
Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora
National research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogaryov Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Sotkova Vasilina V. starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo processa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora yuridicheskogo fakulteta
N.P. Ogaryov Mordovia State University
National research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogaryov Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Sotkova Vasilina V. starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo processa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora yuridicheskogo fakulteta
N.P. Ogaryov Mordovia State University
Abstract:
The article deals with the problematic issues of application of the defense lawyer's petitions and the recognition of evidence inadmissible in the consideration of criminal cases in court with the participation of jurors, as well as negative tendencies of law enforcement practice in the resolution of the said applications by the court. In particular, the author pays special attention to the form of making applications for recognizing evidence inadmissible, their content, as well as the legislative grounds for the recognition of evidence inadmissible.
How to Cite:
Firsov S.N., Kalinkina L.D., Sotkova V.V., (2017), PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 297-301.
Reference list:
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
KHorosheva A.E. Problemnye voprosy rassmotreniya khodataystv zashchity o nedopustimosti dokazatel stv v sude prisyazhnykh po ugolovnym delam ob ubiystvakh URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problem-nye-voprosy-rassmotreniya-hodataystv-zaschity-o-nedopustimosti-dokazatelstv-v-sude-prisyazhnyh-po-ugolovnym-delam-ob-ubiystvah.
Kalinkina L.D. Zayavlenie i razreshenie khodataystv o priznanii dokazatel stv nedopustimymi v sude pervoy instantsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: uchebnoe posobie / L. D. Kalinkina. - Saransk, 2014. - S. 4.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. // http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №8 ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 goda (s izmeneniyami ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 5, ot 16 aprelya 2013 g. № 9 i ot 3 marta 2015 g. № 9) URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 938.
Balakshin V.S. Nedopustimye dokazatel stva: ponyatie i pravovaya priroda URL: https://superinf.ru/ view helpstud.php id 706.
Ugolovnoe delo №2-1/2016 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 335-336 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 343 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley.
KHorosheva A.E. Problemnye voprosy rassmotreniya khodataystv zashchity o nedopustimosti dokazatel stv v sude prisyazhnykh po ugolovnym delam ob ubiystvakh URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problem-nye-voprosy-rassmotreniya-hodataystv-zaschity-o-nedopustimosti-dokazatelstv-v-sude-prisyazhnyh-po-ugolovnym-delam-ob-ubiystvah.
Kalinkina L.D. Zayavlenie i razreshenie khodataystv o priznanii dokazatel stv nedopustimymi v sude pervoy instantsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: uchebnoe posobie / L. D. Kalinkina. - Saransk, 2014. - S. 4.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. // http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №8 ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 goda (s izmeneniyami ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 5, ot 16 aprelya 2013 g. № 9 i ot 3 marta 2015 g. № 9) URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 938.
Balakshin V.S. Nedopustimye dokazatel stva: ponyatie i pravovaya priroda URL: https://superinf.ru/ view helpstud.php id 706.
Ugolovnoe delo №2-1/2016 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 335-336 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 343 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley.
Keywords:
trial, defense attorney, the jury, the petition, inadmissible evidence.
