Choice of an arbitration institution for settlement of an investment dispute in China: dependence on the category of the dispute and the characteristics of the investor
( Pp. 68-73)

The article attempts to link the characteristics of the investor (domestic (Chinese) - foreign) with the types of arbitration and existing Chinese arbitration institutions empowered to settle investment disputes, including newly formed ones (e.g. established on 25 December 2017, Shenzhen international arbitration court (Shenzhen arbitration Commission). The author mentions new acts in this area (e.g. 2017 CIETAC International Investment Arbitration Rules). The results of the review, study and analysis give the author opportunity to concludes that foreign investors operating within the 1986 Law can resolve disputes within SCIA and CIETAC (SAC), likewise PCA, whereas investors, operating under the 1979 and 1988 Laws can settle their disputes within the BAC and other similar internal Chinese arbitration commissions.

Akhmadova M.A., (2018), CHOICE OF AN ARBITRATION INSTITUTION FOR SETTLEMENT OF AN INVESTMENT DISPUTE IN CHINA: DEPENDENCE ON THE CATEGORY OF THE DISPUTE AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INVESTOR. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 68-73.

Arbitrazhnye protsedury v Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respublike (Inf. Torgpredstva RF v KNR). URL: http://www.russchinatrade.ru/ru/useful-info/cn-arbitration (data obrashcheniya: 07.09.2014)
Artem eva YU.A., (2017), Bankovskaya sistema Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki, 4: 90-95.
Akhmadova M.A. (2018), Rossiysko-kitayskoe investitsionnoe sotrudnichestvo v sfere elektroenergetiki: pravovoy aspekt. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki, 2: 172-178.
Bazhanov P. Novyy arbitrazhnyy reglament CIETAC. 16.12.2014. URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2014/12/ 16/novyj ar-bitrazhnyj reglament cietac (data obrashcheniya: 05.07.2018)
Baymukhametov R.M. (2015) Obzor osnovnykh prichin otkaza v priznanii i privedenii v ispolnenie inostrannykh arbitrazhnykh resheniy na territorii Kitaya. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 1: 91-96.
Belikova K.M. Poryadok dosudebnogo (v tom chisle kvazisudebnogo) uregulirovaniya sporov v stranakh BRIKS: obshchie podkhody i vekhi razvitiya. // Zakonodatel stvo i ekonomika. - 2016. - № 4. - S. 49-61.
Belikova K.M., Akhmadova M.A. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh v Rossii: osnovnye podkhody k pravovomu regulirovaniyu deyatel nosti. // Zakonodatel stvo. - 2015. - № 9. - C. 59-66 i dr.
Belikova K.M., Akhmadova M.A. Pravovaya priroda investitsionnykh sporov i nekotorye aspekty protsedury ikh razresheniya investorami iz stran BRIKS v MTSUIS. // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. - 2018. - № 2(75). - S. 67-78.
Belikova K.M., Akhmadova M.A. Stanovlenie i razvitie arbitrazha v stranakh BRIKS: opyt Indii i Kitaya. // Treteyskiy sud. - 2015. - № 2-3 (98-99). - S. 255-264.
Boguslavskiy M.M. Pravovoe polozhenie inostrannykh investitsiy. M. 1993. S. 162.
Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Uchebnoe posobie / pod red. V.V. Bezbakha i V.K. Puchinskogo. - M.: MTSFER. 2004. - S. 113, 114 (896 s.).
David R., ZHoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. - M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1996. - S. 355.
Zakon KNR O paevykh - avt. sovmestnykh predpriyatiyakh s kitayskim i inostrannym kapitalom 1979 g. v red. 2016 g. URL: https://chinalaw.center/civil law/ china sino-foreign joint equity enterprise law revised 2016 russian/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2018)
Zelenov M.V. Kitay 1946-2011. KHrestomatiya. Uchebnoe posobie. Dlya studentov yuridicheskogo fakul teta po spetsial nosti yurisprudentsiya. - SPb.: Izd-vo LGU im. A.S. Pushkina, 2012. - S. 13.
Natsional nye osobennosti i perspektivy unifikatsii chastnogo prava stran BRIKS : uchebnik : v 2 t. T. 1 / K. M. Belikova, V. YU. Ifraimov, M. A. Akhmadova, TS. A. Budzhaeva (Begdzhieva) i dr. ; pod red. d.yu.n., prof. K. M. Belikovoy. - M.: RUDN, 2015. - 595 s.
Natsional nye osobennosti i perspektivy unifikatsii chastnogo prava stran BRIKS : uchebnik : v 2 t. T.2. / K. M. Belikova, N. V. Badaeva, V. YU. Ifraimov, M. A. Akhmadova, N. O. Illarionova i dr. ; pod red. d.yu.n., prof. K. M. Belikova. - M.: RUDN, 2015. - 582 s.
Ekonomicheskoe pravo // Zakonodatel stvo Kitaya. URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/economic law (data obrashcheniya 31.08.2014); Zakony KNR, zakonodatel stvo i pravo Kitaya. // UGL Corporation (China). URL: http://law.uglc.ru/legal.htm (data obrashcheniya 31.08.2014).
Anita Lee. Newly published judicial interpretations on arbitration in China. January 2018. URL: https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/newly-published-judicial-interpretations-on-arbitration-in-china (data obrashcheniya: 07.07.2018)
Anran Zhang. CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules. September 29, 2017. URL: http://leidenlawblog.nl/articles/ cietac-investment-arbitration-rules (data obrashcheniya: 06.07.2018)
Arbitration - The International Arbitration Centre for the Asia Pacific. Why Hong Kong URL: https://www.doj. gov.hk/mobile/eng/public/arbitration.html (data obrashcheniya: 06.07.2018)
China s top court issues arbitration guidance. URL: https://www.vantageasia.com/prc-arbitration-judicial-interpretations/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.07.2018).
Claudia Annacker, Laurie Achtouk-Spivak, Amy Wen Wei. CIETAC Rules for Investment Arbitration, 2017. November 14, 2017. URL: https://www.clearygottlieb.com/ /media/organize-archive/cgsh/files/2017/publications/ alert-memos/cietac-rules-for-investment-arbitration-11-14-17.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 05.07.2018).
Daisy Mallett, Holly Blackwell et al. CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules, 2017. URL: https://www.chinalaw-insight.com/2017/12/articles/global-network/cietac-invest-ment-arbitration-rules/ (data obr.: 08.10.2014)
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. Resolving disputes in China through arbitration. URL: https://uk.practicallaw. thomsonreuters.com/0-381-9781 originationContext knowHow transitionType KnowHowItem contextData 28sc.Default 29 comp pluk (data obr.: 05.07.2018)
Guo Ban Fa 1996 No 22. TSit. po: Jie Zheng. Competition Between Arbitral Institutions in China - Fighting for a Better System October 16, 2015. URL: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/10/16/competition-between-arbitral-institutions-in-china-fighting-for-a-better-system/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.07.2018)
Higgins R. (1994) Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Jingzhou Tao. Resolving Business Disputes in China. // SSH Asia PTI Limited. 2004. R. 11- 400.
Law of the People s Republic of China on Sino-Foreign Cooperative Enterprises (Approved by the First Session of the Seventh National People s Congress on April 13, 1988). URL: http://www.china.org.cn/english/fea-tures/investment/36755.htm (data obr.: 31.06.2018)
SCIA and SAC arbitration institutions merge to form new Arbitration Centre in Shenzhen. 14 February, 2018. URL: https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2018/02/14/scia-and-sca-arbitration-institutions-merge-to-form-new-arbitration-centre-in-shenzhen/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.07.2018)
SHIAC. Introduction. URL: http://www.shiac.org/ SHIAC/aboutus E.aspx page 4 (data obrashcheniya: 05.07.18); Huafang (Mary) Zhu. Arbitration (SHIAC andSCIA-SAC). / Ed. by Tiantong Partners and Practical Law China. URL: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters. com/5-541-9165 originationContext knowHow transition Type KnowHowItem contextData 28sc.RelatedInfo 29 comp pluk (data obrashcheniya: 05.07.2018)
SPC publishes new judicial interpretations on arbitration. URL: https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2018/01/10/spc-publishes-new-judicial-interpretations-on-arbitration/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.07.2018)
Wetter J. Gills (1962) The International Arbitral Process. Vol. 1, 262. P. 27-173.

China, investment disputes, arbitration, internal investor, foreign investor, China international economic and trade arbitration Commission (CIETAC), Shanghai international arbitration center (SHIAC), International arbitration court of Shenzhen (SCIA), model arbitration clause for settlement of investment disputes CIETAC, mediation of investment disputes CIETAC, CIETAC international rules for investment arbitration, 2017, Shanghai arbitration Commission (SHAC), Shenzhen arbitration Commission (SAC), International court of arbitration of the Shenzhen (Shenzhen arbitration Commission (SCIA-SAC), The Beijing arbitration Commission (BAC), judicial Interpretation on the subject of arbitration, the Supreme people's court of China, 2017.