MODERN PROBLEMS OF REALIZATION OF THE attribute OF PUNISHABILITY OF CRIME IN GENERAL AND SPECIAL PART OF CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 137-142)
More about authors
Petrushenkov Alexandr N.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent; docent kafedry gumanitarno-pravovyh disciplin Dzerzhinskogo filiala
Dzerzhinsk branch of the Lobachevsky State University
Dzerzhinsk branch of the Lobachevsky State University
Abstract:
Objectives: The purpose of the prepared scientific article is to analyze the criminality as a sign of crime through the unity of the criminal law of the General and Special part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. The study indicates the direction of the implementation of the considered feature of the crime in the articles of the Special part of the criminal code. Methods: In the scientific article such concepts as "threat of punishment", "punishability", "criminal punishability", "criminal responsibility", "evaluation categories", "measures of criminal-legal character", "gaps and collisions" are applied. The use of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, historical, logical and comparative legal methods allowed us to develop a specific position regarding the implementation of the basis of punishability of the crime in the articles of the Special part of the criminal code. Conclusions: The scientific article developed provisions on amendments to the current criminal legislation in order to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of the crime punishable in the articles of the Special part of the criminal code. The algorithm of fixing the punishment in the sanctions of criminal law, taking into account the categorization of crimes and the penal system, the differentiation of the basis of punishability of crimes and the punishability of administrative offences. The necessity of interrelation of a sign of punishability of a crime with the principles of justice, humanism and inevitability of responsibility is established. Proposed changes in the concept of crime (part 1 of article 14 of the criminal code). The specific gaps and conflicts of the criminal legislation, which do not allow to fully implementing the sign of the punishable crime, are shown. Sense: The content of the scientific article can be used by the teaching staff of higher educational institutions in the teaching of the course "Criminal law", in the preparation of students’ abstracts, term papers and theses. The results of the work can be useful to persons who carry out legislative activities in the field of criminal law. The principal provisions of the study can be used in the preparation of dissertation research.
How to Cite:
Petrushenkov A.N., (2018), MODERN PROBLEMS OF REALIZATION OF THE ATTRIBUTE OF PUNISHABILITY OF CRIME IN GENERAL AND SPECIAL PART OF CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 137-142.
Reference list:
Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast . Tom 1. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod red. d.yu.n., professora N.F. Kuznetsovoy i k.yu.n., dotsenta I.M. Tyazhkovoy. - M.: Izdatel stvo ZERTSALO, 1999. - 592 s.
Kozlov A.P. Ponyatie prestupleniya. - SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004. - 819 s.
Kovalev M.I. Ponyatie i priznaki prestupleniya i ikh znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii. Uchebnoe posobie / Kovalev M.I. - Sverdlovsk: Izdatel stvo Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1977. - 80 s.
Novoselov G.P. Uchenie ob ob ekte prestupleniya. Metodologicheskie aspekty / Novoselov G.P. - M.: Norma, 2001. - 208 s.
Kuznetsova N.F. Izbrannye trudy / Predislovie akademika V.N. Kudryavtseva. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2003. - 834 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. YU.I. Skuratova i V.M. Lebedeva. - M.: NORMA, 2002. - 960 s.
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: ucheb.: v 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast / pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-KHegay, V.S. Komisarova, A.I. Raroga. - M.: Velbi, Prospekt, 2007. - 528 s.
Bibik O.N. Nakazuemost kak priznak prestupleniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya Pravo . - 2008. - № 2 (15).
Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: CHast obshchaya: V 6 t. / T. 2: Prestuplenie / Avt. zasluzh. deyat. nauki RSFSR, chlen-korr. AN SSSR A.A. Piontkovskiy. - M.: Izdatel stvo Nauka , 1970. - 516 s.
Kisin V.R. Sostoyanie granitsy mezhdu administrativnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennost yu // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. - 2016. - № 7.
Popugaev YU.I. O neobkhodimosti differentsiatsii razmerov administrativnykh i analogichnykh ugolovnykh nakazaniy s uchetom stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. - 2014. - № 2.
Konyakhin V.P., Poltavets V.V. Institut naznacheniya nakazaniya: ponyatie i strukturno-funktsional nyy analiz // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . - 2016. - № 14.
Lekhanova E.S. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya sudebno-ekonomicheskikh znaniy v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2009. - № 4.
Kozlov A.P. Ponyatie prestupleniya. - SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004. - 819 s.
Kovalev M.I. Ponyatie i priznaki prestupleniya i ikh znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii. Uchebnoe posobie / Kovalev M.I. - Sverdlovsk: Izdatel stvo Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1977. - 80 s.
Novoselov G.P. Uchenie ob ob ekte prestupleniya. Metodologicheskie aspekty / Novoselov G.P. - M.: Norma, 2001. - 208 s.
Kuznetsova N.F. Izbrannye trudy / Predislovie akademika V.N. Kudryavtseva. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2003. - 834 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. YU.I. Skuratova i V.M. Lebedeva. - M.: NORMA, 2002. - 960 s.
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: ucheb.: v 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast / pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-KHegay, V.S. Komisarova, A.I. Raroga. - M.: Velbi, Prospekt, 2007. - 528 s.
Bibik O.N. Nakazuemost kak priznak prestupleniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya Pravo . - 2008. - № 2 (15).
Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: CHast obshchaya: V 6 t. / T. 2: Prestuplenie / Avt. zasluzh. deyat. nauki RSFSR, chlen-korr. AN SSSR A.A. Piontkovskiy. - M.: Izdatel stvo Nauka , 1970. - 516 s.
Kisin V.R. Sostoyanie granitsy mezhdu administrativnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennost yu // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. - 2016. - № 7.
Popugaev YU.I. O neobkhodimosti differentsiatsii razmerov administrativnykh i analogichnykh ugolovnykh nakazaniy s uchetom stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. - 2014. - № 2.
Konyakhin V.P., Poltavets V.V. Institut naznacheniya nakazaniya: ponyatie i strukturno-funktsional nyy analiz // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . - 2016. - № 14.
Lekhanova E.S. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya sudebno-ekonomicheskikh znaniy v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2009. - № 4.
Keywords:
the elements of a crime, punishability, the threat of punishment, measures of criminal-legal nature, the implementation of punishability of a socially dangerous act in the articles of the Special part of the criminal code, gaps and conflicts of criminal legislation.
