Problems implementing the principle of guilt in criminal law
( Pp. 167-171)
More about authors
Pitetskiy Vadim Valerevich
kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava.
Siberian Federal University
Siberian Federal University
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the urgent problem of interpretation and observance of the principle of guilt (Article 5 of the Criminal Code). The author analyzes the requirements of the general definition of imputation guilty in criminal law (Part 1 of Art. 5 of the Criminal Code). Considers the evaluation of the offense is a discrepancy between the objective circumstances of the offense and their subjective perception of guilt. Special attention is given to the concept and content of objective imputation (Part 2 of Art. 5 of the Criminal Code). As a result, the author offers his definition of the principle of guilt and unacceptable objective imputation orientation which will increasingly contribute to solving problems of criminal law.
How to Cite:
Pitetskiy V.V., (2014), PROBLEMS IMPLEMENTING THE PRINCIPLE OF GUILT IN CRIMINAL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 167-171.
Reference list:
Bavsun, M. V. TSelesoobraznost v ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2002.
Bytko S.YU. O dopustimosti i predelakh ob ektivnogo vmeneniya v ugolovnom prave // Sovremennoe pravo. 2009. № 7.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1997. № 10.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 11 avgusta 2011 g. Delo № 22 -360/111547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16 marta 2010 g. № 22-1547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 31 yanvarya 2012 g. 1547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga 24 marta 2011 goda. Delo № 22-352/20111547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. SPb., 2003. S. 136.
Markaryan S. A. Znachenie sub ektivnoy storony prestupleniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve RF // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1.
Mustafaev M.KH. Sub ektivnaya storona prestupleniya kak determinant effektivnosti kriminalisticheskoy metodiki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 6.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 361p04pr // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2005. № 1.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 420-P07. Obzor zakonodatel stva i sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii za pervyy kvartal 2008 g. // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 8.
Rarog A. I. Nastol naya kniga sud i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: prakt. posobie. M.: TK Velbi, 2006.
Bytko S.YU. O dopustimosti i predelakh ob ektivnogo vmeneniya v ugolovnom prave // Sovremennoe pravo. 2009. № 7.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1997. № 10.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 11 avgusta 2011 g. Delo № 22 -360/111547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16 marta 2010 g. № 22-1547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 31 yanvarya 2012 g. 1547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga 24 marta 2011 goda. Delo № 22-352/20111547 // Tekst opredeleniya razmeshchen na sayte spravochno-pravovoy sistemy RosPravosudie (https://rospravosudie.com)
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. SPb., 2003. S. 136.
Markaryan S. A. Znachenie sub ektivnoy storony prestupleniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve RF // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1.
Mustafaev M.KH. Sub ektivnaya storona prestupleniya kak determinant effektivnosti kriminalisticheskoy metodiki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 6.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 361p04pr // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2005. № 1.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 420-P07. Obzor zakonodatel stva i sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii za pervyy kvartal 2008 g. // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 8.
Rarog A. I. Nastol naya kniga sud i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: prakt. posobie. M.: TK Velbi, 2006.
Keywords:
the principle of the right, wine, objective imputation, qualification of a crime, criminal liability.