Prosecutor’s submission to eliminate violations of the criminal procedure law in the pre-trial proceedings
( Pp. 211-215)

The article is focusing on the current problem regarding verification and optimization of the power of the prosecutor to control procedural activity of the preliminary investigation bodies. In the prosecutor supervision practice there has been a traditional procedure for responding to the revealed violations in the area of ​​criminal procedures that is to represent a petition. However this power of the prosecutor has not received legislated change of the Criminal Procedure Code to correct and mitigate the procedures causing problematic situations. The following study formulates the proposals to improve the active legislation; it is based on the analysis of the scientists’ opinions, the examples of established practice in applying the law, the prosecutor's office’s statistics, as well as on the results of the survey of prosecutors in various regions of Russia conducted by the author. The conclusions and proposals presented in the study can be used in practices by the law enforcement authorities, as well as in preparing topical scientific and methodical studies. The author’s proposals’ implementation upon capturing in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the prosecutor right to make a submission to eliminate the law violations will allow to apply effectively and complex-valued the system of powers to oversee the procedural activity of the preliminary investigation bodies as a whole, and thus will help to strengthen the mechanism of warrantee of the participants’ rights in criminal proceedings.

Spirin A.W., (2014), PROSECUTOR’S SUBMISSION TO ELIMINATE VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW IN THE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 211-215.

Abdul-Kadyrov SH. M. Funktsii i polnomochiya prokurora v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Zakonnost . 2012. № 9. S. 12-15.
Abdul-Kadyrov SH.M. Prokurorskiy nadzor i vedomstvennyy protsessual nyy kontrol na predvaritel nom sledstvii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. S. 152-154.
Bicheev D.V. Akty prokurorskogo reagirovaniya (nadzora) v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 3. S. 190-192.
Bushkovskaya E.N. Nadzor prokurora za protsessual noy deyatel nost yu sledovatelya i doznavatelya v dosudebnom proizvodstve: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 26 s.
Vil de L.V. Slozhnosti realizatsii nadzornoy funktsii prokurora na dosudebnoy stadii proizvodstva po delu // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 3. S. 32-34.
Vinokurov A.YU. K voprosu o klassifikatsii nadzornykh polnomochiy prokurora // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. 2010. № 3. S. 274-281.
Vinokurov A.YU. Sledstvennyy komitet RF kak ob ekt nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov // Zakonnost . 2011. № 11. S. 53 -55.
Goryunov V. V. Nadzor za sledstviem v organakh prokuratury // Zakonnost . 2009. № 2. S. 33-37.
Grinyuk E.N. O polnomochiyakh i funktsiyakh prokurora na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 5. S. 127-129.
Dronov V.V. Nadzor za protsessual noy deyatel nost yu organov, osushchestvlyayushchikh predvaritel noe sledstvie // Zakonnost . 2014. № 5. S. 48-49.
Ergashev E.R. Problemy pravovogo statusa prokurora v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2008. № 4. S. 88- 91.
Ergashev E.R., Prigorshcha P.A. Trebovanie prokurora kak instrument obespecheniya ispolneniya zakona. Ekaterinburg, 2010. 124 s.
Poluyanenko M.G. K voprosu ob optimal nom sootnoshenii nadzora i protsessual nogo kontrolya za deyatel nost sledovatelya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 6. S. 266-268.
Suprun S.V. Prokurorskiy nadzor i vedomstvennyy kontrol : sootnoshenie i perspektivy razvitiya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. № 1. S. 46-48.

view, criminal procedure law, investigation, the criminal process, investigative actions.