LIMITS OF COGNITION OF CRIMINAL CASE FACTUAL SITUATION BY THE ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
( Pp. 207-210)

One of the main tasks of the defense in a criminal trial is to identify the circumstances justifying the suspect or the accused or mitigate their punishment. For such activities, undoubtedly having cognitive character, Criminal Procedure Act gives the defense a significant number of procedural powers, but some scholars believe these powers inadequate, limited, which, in their opinion, contrary to the principle of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms. Some are calling equalize authority in cognitive activities of investigation and the defense. Lack of common views on the relation of cognitive powers of prosecution and defense leads to misunderstanding them, in fact, the opposite functions, which negatively affects the law enforcement practice. Disagreeing with the above mentioned approaches and the problem, the author expresses his own attitude to the issue of restrictions on the activities of the lawyer in the knowledge of the actual circumstances of the criminal case, which makes the article very relevant. The author's purpose in this article was to analyze factors influencing the establishment of limits and limitations in cognitive activity of the lawyer. The article describes the various ranges of cognitive activity marker, formed relationships with his client (the principal) and its position in the criminal case, the status of the marker and its role in the process. Apart from the legal and professional ethical factors in relations lawyer and client, studied the psychological factor, which takes place in the relationship lawyer and a representative of the principal influencing the selection and formation of a lawyer-representative position on the case. To achieve this goal by applying the method of complex systems analysis, legalistic method. The author makes a noteworthy conclusion that the legal nature of the security features in advocacy different than representational function. Scientific novelty provided by the article is that it is different systematic approach to the study of the problems indicated in the criminal procedure, professional and ethical and psychological aspects. The usefulness of this article seems that the conclusions contained in it can be used for targeted training of young cadres Bar. Analysis conducted by the author, he received the findings are noteworthy leading researchers of the Russian legal, are a major cause for enhancing the scientific debate on the issues marked

Orlov A.A., (2014), LIMITS OF COGNITION OF CRIMINAL CASE FACTUAL SITUATION BY THE ATTORNEY-AT-LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 207-210.

Advokat: navyki professional nogo masterstva / Pod red. L.A. Voskobitovoy, I.N. Luk yanovoy, L.P. Mikhaylovoy. M.: Volters Kluver. 2006. - 592 s.
Brester A.A., Panchenko V.YU. Publichnoe nachalo sovremennogo rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i yuridicheskaya pomoshch // Advokat. 2012. № 12.
Voskobitova L.A. Sostyazatel nost : dve kontseptsii uchastiya advokata v dokazyvanii. Stat ya 2. Programma // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2012. № 4.
Galoganov E.A. Uchastie zashchitnika v sude pervoy instantsii // Advokatskaya praktika. 2005. № 1.
Kodeks professional noy etiki advokata (prinyat Pervym Vserossiyskim s ezdom advokatov 31.01.2003) (red. ot 22.04.2013) // Vestnik Federal noy palaty advokatov RF. 2013. № 3.
Kolobashkina S.S. Pravovaya pozitsiya advokata - predstavitelya po grazhdanskomu delu: ponyatie i osobennosti opredeleniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2011. № 3.
Kolokolov N.A. Advokat v ugolovnom protsesse: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial nosti YUrisprudentsiya / pod red. N.A. Kolokolova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo. 2010. - 375 s.
Kudryavtsev V.L. Problemy formirovaniya i realizatsii pozitsii advokata-zashchitnika na sudebnom sledstvii // Advokat. 2005. № 4.
Kucherena A.G. Advokatura v usloviyakh sudebno-pravovoy reformy v Rossii: Monografiya. M.: YURKOMPANI. 2009. - 434 s.
Lupinskaya P.A. Ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. P.A. Lupinskoy. M., 1997. - 1072 s.
Oreshin E. V. YUridicheskaya priroda norm professional noy etiki advokata // Biznes v zakone, № 2. 2014, s.210-212
Pan ko N.K. Realizatsiya funktsii zashchity na dosudebnykh stadiyakh proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Advokatskaya praktika. 2002. № 3.
Podol nyy N.A. Istina v deyatel nosti advokata pri osushchestvlenii im zashchity v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Advokatskaya praktika. 2010. № 1.
Pristanskov D. Kreditnye prestupleniya // EZH-YUrist. 2004. № 25.
KHodilina M.V. Nekotorye eticheskie problemy, voznikayushchie pri osushchestvlenii advokatom zashchity po ugolovnym delam // Advokatskaya praktika. 2012. № 3.

cognitive activity, the limits of knowledge, the Trustee, the status of the defender.