The responsibility for the abuse of the right
( Pp. 79-81)

In the article the essence of abuse of rights and legal instruments of accountability for abuse of the right to civil legal relations. The problem of abuse of the right over the years attracted attention of scientists, jurist, but a single legal doctrine, as well as the unity of views on the nature and the legal nature of this phenomenon has not yet been developed. The civil legislation of the Russian Federation prohibits the abuse of the right, established accountability measures to ensure that the ban, but the theoretical and legal basis of such liability in the works of Russian scientists studied enough. In his article, the author aims to analyze the legal framework to bring to civil liability for the abuse of rights, as well as a number of noteworthy opinions of scientists about the subject. This objective is achieved by examining the significant volume of scientific literature, a detailed study of the rules of national civil law, a number of examples of legal regulation in foreign countries. Exploring the question of the legality or illegality of acts involving the abuse of law, the author comes to a number of important conclusions of bringing the theoretical basis for the legal protection from these acts. The author defends the position and the conclusions have some scientific value, as contributing to the development of the legal theory of abuse of rights in the civil law, as well as contribute to the maintenance and expansion of the discussion on the problems of abuse of rights. A number of theses contained in this article, can definitely be included in the educational materials of legal education of civil specialization, and taken into account the development of Russian civil law when designing the rules prohibiting the abuse of rights.

Kurzhupova Y.V., (2015), THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ABUSE OF THE RIGHT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 79-81.

Belov V. A. Dobrosovestnost , razumnost , spravedlivost kak printsipy grazhdanskogo prava//Zakonodatel stvo, 1998, №8, S.50
Belov V.A. Avtomobil kak ob ekt prava sobstvennosti grazhdanina // Zakonodatel stvo, 1998, № 12, s. 13-21
Belov V.A. Eshche raz o probleme bezdokumentarnykh tsennykh bumag: Retsenziya na knigu D.I. Stepanova Zashchita prav vladel tsa tsennykh bumag, uchityvaemykh zapis yu na schete // Pravovedenie, 2004, № 2, s. 211-231
Volkov A. V. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v kachestve sanktsii za zloupotreblenie pravom// Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2015, №3
Kuzin A.A. Voskhozhdenie shikany k rimskom pravu//Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2015. № 1. S. 74-77.
Larin V. I. K voprosu o protivopravnosti zloupotrebleniya pravom // Pravo i politika, 2007, №3, S. 32
Tutaev KH.A. Sushchnost form zashchity rossiyskim gosudarstvom osnovnykh prav i svobod // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 5. S. 14-17.
YAtsenko T.S. Kategoriya shikany v grazhdanskom prave: istoriya i sovremennost . M.: Statut, 2003. S. 132 - 137.

abuse of the right, civil liability, damages, the illegality of the acts.