About theoretical reasons for ignoring principle of limited liability with regard to group of companies
( Pp. 90-93)

The article is devoted to the classical principle of corporate law - the principle of limited liability of a shareholder. The principle of limited liability, which arose during the existence of simple corporations as an instrument of stimulating the investments of individuals, should be applied in accordance principle of justice and the purposes of this institution, which cannot by fully applied to group of companies.

Akhmetov A.I., (2018), ABOUT THEORETICAL REASONS FOR IGNORING PRINCIPLE OF LIMITED LIABILITY WITH REGARD TO GROUP OF COMPANIES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 90-93.

Kulagin M.I. Izbrannye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Statut , 2004 - 363 s.
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel noe korporativnoe pravo. - M: Statut, 2014, 455 s.
C.M. Schmitthoff. The Wholly Owned and the Controlled Subsidiary. 1978, Sweet Maxwell, London, 229.
A.Daehnert. Lifting the corporate veil: English and German perspectives on group liability. 2007. International Company and Commercial Law Review.
Irit Mevorach. Insolvency within Multinational Enterprise Groups (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009), 360.
Karen Vandekerckhove, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Kluwer Law International. 2007, 765.
Max Planck Encyclopedia Of European Private Law, J rgen Basedow, Klaus Hopt Reinhard Zimmermann, eds., Oxford University Press, 2012, 1277.
Ph. I. Blumberg, Limited Liability and Corporate Groups, 11 J.CORP.L.
Ph. I. Blumberg. The law of corporate groups. Tort, Contract and Other Common Law Problems in the Substantive Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations. (Little, Brown and Co. 1987) 5865.
United States v. Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co. (C.C.E.D. Wisc., 1905) 142 Fed.
A.A. Berle Jr. The theory of enterprise entity. 47 Colum. L. Rev.

the principle of limited liability, Corporation, group of companies.