Some features of the conceptual apparatus of crime in the sphere of intellectual property
( Pp. 139-142)
More about authors
Mandriko Aleksandr V.
aspirant
the Federal state Autonomous educational institution of higher professional education «North-Caucasian Federal University»
the Federal state Autonomous educational institution of higher professional education «North-Caucasian Federal University»
Abstract:
Due to changes In legislation in the sphere of intellectual property protection and contentious issues arising in the analysis of the current state of criminogenic situation in the sphere of intellectual property has arisen the need to clarify the conceptual apparatus. The article presents the views of some Russian (V. D. Spasovich, Y. V. Trencevski, V. D. Larichev, etc.) and foreign authors (Elio de Tula, Switzerland) presented their analysis on the basis of which the author clarifies a number of concepts such as "counterfeit", "counterfeit goods, the instances", "counterfeiting" and "counterfeit goods" and "intellectual piracy", considering their classification and gives his vision of the problem. The results of the study presented in this article will be useful both in theoretical and practical aspects.
How to Cite:
Mandriko A.V., (2015), SOME FEATURES OF THE CONCEPTUAL APPARATUS OF CRIME IN THE SPHERE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 139-142.
Reference list:
http://forthewomen.info/falsificirovannye-produkty-i-tovary/vidy-falsifikacii.html
Bardov I. Ponyatie kontrafaktnykh tovarov// file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/ INtellektual naya 20 20sobstvennost /Ponyatie 20kontrafaktnykh 20tovarov 20 20ivanbardov. info.html
V ryade nauchnykh rabot vstrechaetsya i takoe ponyatie kak nelegitimnyy tovar ego rassmatrivayut kak neuchtennyy tovar. On mozhet byt ne fal sifitsirovannym, kachestvennym, ne kotrofaktnym, no neuchtennym.
GK RF. Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 10164072/77/ ixzz3gQ2StDqz
Dannaya pozitsiya podderzhivaetsya i A.V. Nesterovym (Sm. podrobno: Fal sifikatsiya i kontrafaktsiya: ekspertnyy aspekt. //http://www.labrate. ru/articles/nesterov article 2001 contrafactio.htm
Dolotov R.O. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v sfere prestupnykh posyagatel stv na ob ekty intellektual noy sobstvennosti. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. - Saratov, 2009.- S.
Kondrikova, N.M. Intellektual naya sobstvennost : slovar -spravochnik / N.M. Kondrikova, L.N. Kazakova. Natsional naya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya. 2003. URL: http://determiner.ru/dictionary/220 (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2008.);
Korchagin, A.D. Zakonodatel stvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii o protivodeystvii narusheniyam v sfere intellektual noy sobstvennosti, svyazannym s kontrafaktsiey / A.D. Korchagin, N.S. Orlova, R.B. SHabanov. M., INITS Rospatenta, 2005. S. 4;
Logvinov, YU.V. Bor ba s intellektual nym piratstvom. Kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk / YUriy Vladimirovich Logvinov. M., 2002. S. 10, 21;
O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov (s izm. i dopol. ot13 iyulya 2015 g. N 213-FZ): Federal nyy zakon ot 2 yanvarya 2000 g. № 29-FZ: Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 12117866/ ixzz3gQMJ5lfu
O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v svyazi s vvedeniem v deystvie chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Plenuma VAS RF № 29 ot 26.03.2009 g. i Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 5.: Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 1790777/ ixzz3gQ58lSnB
Po okhrane literaturnykh i khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy: Bernskaya Konventsiya ot 09.09.1886g. // http://www.bestpravo.ru/federalnoje/gn-postanovlenija/ n8k.htm
Spasovich, V.D. Prava avtora i kontrafaktsiya. Sankt-Peterburg, izdanie knigoprodavtsa i tipografa M. V. Vol fa, 1865. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Garant .
Truntsevskiy, YU.V. Zashchita avtorskogo i smezhnykh prav v audiovizual noy sfere: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty: nauch.-praktich. posobie / V.D. Larichev, YU.V. Truntsevskiy. M., Delo, 2004. S. 80.
Elio de Tul o. Sotrudnichestvo mezhdu informatsionnymi posrednikami i pravoobladatelyami dlya zashchity intellektual noy sobstvennosti v Internete // Sud po intellektual noy sobstvennosti: ipc.arbitr.ru
Uzdenov R.M. K voprosu o klassifikatsii raznovidnostey pokusheniya na prestuplenie // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №3. - S. 70-74.
Uzdenov R.M. Problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya prigotovleniya k prestupleniyu i klassifikatsii ego raznovidnostey // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №3. - S. 112-117.
Uzdenov R.M. Ugolovno-pravovaya reglamentatsiya stadiy neokonchennogo prestupleniya v sovetskom zakonodatel stve // Biznes v zakone. ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2014. - №3. - S. 39-43.
Bardov I. Ponyatie kontrafaktnykh tovarov// file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/ INtellektual naya 20 20sobstvennost /Ponyatie 20kontrafaktnykh 20tovarov 20 20ivanbardov. info.html
V ryade nauchnykh rabot vstrechaetsya i takoe ponyatie kak nelegitimnyy tovar ego rassmatrivayut kak neuchtennyy tovar. On mozhet byt ne fal sifitsirovannym, kachestvennym, ne kotrofaktnym, no neuchtennym.
GK RF. Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 10164072/77/ ixzz3gQ2StDqz
Dannaya pozitsiya podderzhivaetsya i A.V. Nesterovym (Sm. podrobno: Fal sifikatsiya i kontrafaktsiya: ekspertnyy aspekt. //http://www.labrate. ru/articles/nesterov article 2001 contrafactio.htm
Dolotov R.O. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v sfere prestupnykh posyagatel stv na ob ekty intellektual noy sobstvennosti. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. - Saratov, 2009.- S.
Kondrikova, N.M. Intellektual naya sobstvennost : slovar -spravochnik / N.M. Kondrikova, L.N. Kazakova. Natsional naya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya. 2003. URL: http://determiner.ru/dictionary/220 (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2008.);
Korchagin, A.D. Zakonodatel stvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii o protivodeystvii narusheniyam v sfere intellektual noy sobstvennosti, svyazannym s kontrafaktsiey / A.D. Korchagin, N.S. Orlova, R.B. SHabanov. M., INITS Rospatenta, 2005. S. 4;
Logvinov, YU.V. Bor ba s intellektual nym piratstvom. Kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk / YUriy Vladimirovich Logvinov. M., 2002. S. 10, 21;
O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov (s izm. i dopol. ot13 iyulya 2015 g. N 213-FZ): Federal nyy zakon ot 2 yanvarya 2000 g. № 29-FZ: Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 12117866/ ixzz3gQMJ5lfu
O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v svyazi s vvedeniem v deystvie chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Plenuma VAS RF № 29 ot 26.03.2009 g. i Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 5.: Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/ 1790777/ ixzz3gQ58lSnB
Po okhrane literaturnykh i khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy: Bernskaya Konventsiya ot 09.09.1886g. // http://www.bestpravo.ru/federalnoje/gn-postanovlenija/ n8k.htm
Spasovich, V.D. Prava avtora i kontrafaktsiya. Sankt-Peterburg, izdanie knigoprodavtsa i tipografa M. V. Vol fa, 1865. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Garant .
Truntsevskiy, YU.V. Zashchita avtorskogo i smezhnykh prav v audiovizual noy sfere: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty: nauch.-praktich. posobie / V.D. Larichev, YU.V. Truntsevskiy. M., Delo, 2004. S. 80.
Elio de Tul o. Sotrudnichestvo mezhdu informatsionnymi posrednikami i pravoobladatelyami dlya zashchity intellektual noy sobstvennosti v Internete // Sud po intellektual noy sobstvennosti: ipc.arbitr.ru
Uzdenov R.M. K voprosu o klassifikatsii raznovidnostey pokusheniya na prestuplenie // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №3. - S. 70-74.
Uzdenov R.M. Problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya prigotovleniya k prestupleniyu i klassifikatsii ego raznovidnostey // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №3. - S. 112-117.
Uzdenov R.M. Ugolovno-pravovaya reglamentatsiya stadiy neokonchennogo prestupleniya v sovetskom zakonodatel stve // Biznes v zakone. ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2014. - №3. - S. 39-43.
Keywords:
the intellectual property, concepts, counterfeit, counterfeit goods, instances, counterfeiting, counterfeit goods, intellectual piracy.
