PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES
( Pp. 406-409)
More about authors
Bashilov Boris Igorevich
advokat, chlen advokatskoy palaty g. Moskvy, soiskatel. Mesto ucheby: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the institution of proving the existence of grounds for the adoption by arbitration courts of preliminary injunction on corporate disputes. Consideration is given to such aspects as the role of subjective judicial discretion, the estimated nature of the used legislative conceptual apparatus, and the process and scope of necessary proof of the grounds for acceptance of preliminary injunction for corporate disputes.
How to Cite:
Bashilov B.I., (2018), PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 406-409.
Reference list:
Abdulov I.V. Problemy dokazyvaniya nalichiya osnovaniy dlya prinyatiya obespechitel nykh mer v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. № 10.
Abrosimov D.A. Obespechitel nye mery po korporativnym sporam: protsessual nye osobennosti i ogranicheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2017. №21.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002 g. № 30. St. 3012 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 28.12.2017 g.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya1994 g. № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 29.12.2017 g.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami predvaritel nykh obespechitel nykh mer ot 07 iyulya 2004 g. № 78 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004 g. № 8.
Pavlova N.V. Uskorennaya sudebnaya zashchita: predvaritel nye obespechitel nye mery v kommercheskom protsesse. M., 2005.
Pankratov P. A. Nekotorye osobennosti prinyatiya arbitrazhnym sudom obespechitel nykh mer pri rassmotrenii korporativnykh sporov // Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb.: Svoe izdatel stvo, 2016.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O praktike rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zayavleniy o prinyatii obespechitel nykh mer, svyazannykh s zapretom provodit obshchie sobraniya aktsionerov ot 09 iyulya 2003 g. № 11 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2003 g. № 9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O primenenii arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitel nykh mer ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. № 55 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006 g. № 12. s izm. i dop. v red. ot 27.06.2017 g.
Rutkovskaya L.G. Sorazmernost obespechitel nykh mer zayavlennym trebovaniyam // Arbitrazhnye spory, 2016. URL: http://ppt.ru/news/135060 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
Solov eva I. E. Obespechenie iska kak garantiya zashchity prav malogo biznesa // Pravo. Zakonodatel stvo. Lichnost . Saratov, 2012. № 1(14).
Frolova E.E., Karmadonova E.V. Institut professional nogo motivirovannogo suzhdeniya: tendentsii dal neyshego razvitiya i mesto v sisteme bankovskogo prava i zakonodatel stva // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2014. № 20.
Artemyeva Yu.A., Ivanovskaya N.V., Voykova N.A., Frolova E.E. War to the bitter end or finally a compromise Prospects for court approval of tax dispute settlements with the participation of entrepreneurs in Russia // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. 9 (36).
Abrosimov D.A. Obespechitel nye mery po korporativnym sporam: protsessual nye osobennosti i ogranicheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2017. №21.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002 g. № 30. St. 3012 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 28.12.2017 g.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya1994 g. № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 29.12.2017 g.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami predvaritel nykh obespechitel nykh mer ot 07 iyulya 2004 g. № 78 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004 g. № 8.
Pavlova N.V. Uskorennaya sudebnaya zashchita: predvaritel nye obespechitel nye mery v kommercheskom protsesse. M., 2005.
Pankratov P. A. Nekotorye osobennosti prinyatiya arbitrazhnym sudom obespechitel nykh mer pri rassmotrenii korporativnykh sporov // Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb.: Svoe izdatel stvo, 2016.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O praktike rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zayavleniy o prinyatii obespechitel nykh mer, svyazannykh s zapretom provodit obshchie sobraniya aktsionerov ot 09 iyulya 2003 g. № 11 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2003 g. № 9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O primenenii arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitel nykh mer ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. № 55 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006 g. № 12. s izm. i dop. v red. ot 27.06.2017 g.
Rutkovskaya L.G. Sorazmernost obespechitel nykh mer zayavlennym trebovaniyam // Arbitrazhnye spory, 2016. URL: http://ppt.ru/news/135060 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
Solov eva I. E. Obespechenie iska kak garantiya zashchity prav malogo biznesa // Pravo. Zakonodatel stvo. Lichnost . Saratov, 2012. № 1(14).
Frolova E.E., Karmadonova E.V. Institut professional nogo motivirovannogo suzhdeniya: tendentsii dal neyshego razvitiya i mesto v sisteme bankovskogo prava i zakonodatel stva // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2014. № 20.
Artemyeva Yu.A., Ivanovskaya N.V., Voykova N.A., Frolova E.E. War to the bitter end or finally a compromise Prospects for court approval of tax dispute settlements with the participation of entrepreneurs in Russia // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. 9 (36).
Keywords:
the arbitration process, corporate dispute, interim measures, security measures in corporate dispute, proof, judicial discretion.
Related Articles
Public Law (State Law) Pages: 26-31 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2024-17-7-026-031 Issue №160584
Cancellation Fee: Conditions of Reduction, Legal Ways of Settlement
unilateral renunciation of an obligation
unilateral renunciation of a contract
unmotivated renunciation of a contract
fee for renunciation of a contract
compensation for withdrawal from a contract
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 174-177 Issue №4285
To a question about the kinds of subjects and combating crimes investigation
the opposition
investigation
proof
trial
Show more
21. Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 253-255 Issue №11740
NEW IN PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION OF MEDIATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
mediation
judicial conciliation
negotiations
verification of documents
the settlement agreement
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 209-213 Issue №4982
SUBSTANTIATION AS A TYPE OF COGNITION AND ITS THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL MEANING
the criminal process
proof
proof
knowledge
research evidence
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 178-183 Issue №2615
Scientific and technological progress and the problems of improving criminal procedural legislation
criminal procedure law
proof
source of evidence
documents
annexes to the protocols of investigative actions
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 202-206 Issue №6840
TRADITIONAL AND NEW APPROACHES TO THE LEGALLY DEFINITIONS OF "EVIDENCE" IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
the criminal process
the comparativism
law of evidence
proof
sources of evidence
Show more
13. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 203-206 Issue №3758
On the intersectoral regulation of circumstances to be proved at the stage of sentence execution
the sentence
proof
cross-sectoral regulation
the circumstances to be proven
Show more
10. Financial law; Tax law; Budgetary law; Administrative law; Administrative process Pages: 192-194 Issue №5975
TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION
prejudice
the administrative process
proof
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 193-196 Issue №4088
PROBLEM LEGAL NATURE OF THE STAGE OF INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING
the stage of excitation of criminal case
the availability of criminal justice
proof
sources of evidence
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 194-196 Issue №8046
To the question of overcoming prejudice in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation
criminal proceedings
validity
the sentence
proof
prejudice
Show more