PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES
( Pp. 406-409)

More about authors
Bashilov Boris Igorevich advokat, chlen advokatskoy palaty g. Moskvy, soiskatel. Mesto ucheby: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the institution of proving the existence of grounds for the adoption by arbitration courts of preliminary injunction on corporate disputes. Consideration is given to such aspects as the role of subjective judicial discretion, the estimated nature of the used legislative conceptual apparatus, and the process and scope of necessary proof of the grounds for acceptance of preliminary injunction for corporate disputes.
How to Cite:
Bashilov B.I., (2018), PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 406-409.
Reference list:
Abdulov I.V. Problemy dokazyvaniya nalichiya osnovaniy dlya prinyatiya obespechitel nykh mer v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. № 10.
Abrosimov D.A. Obespechitel nye mery po korporativnym sporam: protsessual nye osobennosti i ogranicheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2017. №21.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002 g. № 30. St. 3012 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 28.12.2017 g.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya1994 g. № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 29.12.2017 g.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami predvaritel nykh obespechitel nykh mer ot 07 iyulya 2004 g. № 78 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004 g. № 8.
Pavlova N.V. Uskorennaya sudebnaya zashchita: predvaritel nye obespechitel nye mery v kommercheskom protsesse. M., 2005.
Pankratov P. A. Nekotorye osobennosti prinyatiya arbitrazhnym sudom obespechitel nykh mer pri rassmotrenii korporativnykh sporov // Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb.: Svoe izdatel stvo, 2016.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O praktike rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zayavleniy o prinyatii obespechitel nykh mer, svyazannykh s zapretom provodit obshchie sobraniya aktsionerov ot 09 iyulya 2003 g. № 11 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2003 g. № 9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O primenenii arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitel nykh mer ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. № 55 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006 g. № 12. s izm. i dop. v red. ot 27.06.2017 g.
Rutkovskaya L.G. Sorazmernost obespechitel nykh mer zayavlennym trebovaniyam // Arbitrazhnye spory, 2016. URL: http://ppt.ru/news/135060 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
Solov eva I. E. Obespechenie iska kak garantiya zashchity prav malogo biznesa // Pravo. Zakonodatel stvo. Lichnost . Saratov, 2012. № 1(14).
Frolova E.E., Karmadonova E.V. Institut professional nogo motivirovannogo suzhdeniya: tendentsii dal neyshego razvitiya i mesto v sisteme bankovskogo prava i zakonodatel stva // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2014. № 20.
Artemyeva Yu.A., Ivanovskaya N.V., Voykova N.A., Frolova E.E. War to the bitter end or finally a compromise Prospects for court approval of tax dispute settlements with the participation of entrepreneurs in Russia // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. 9 (36).
Keywords:
the arbitration process, corporate dispute, interim measures, security measures in corporate dispute, proof, judicial discretion.


Related Articles

Private Law (Civil) Pages: 43-46 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2022-1-1-43-46 Issue №22649
Procedural Features of the Use in Proving the Results of Operational Investigative Activities in Cases of Crimes Against the Personal Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen
proof admissibility of evidence human and civil rights and freedoms results of operational investigative activities technical means of fixation
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 193-196 Issue №4088
PROBLEM LEGAL NATURE OF THE STAGE OF INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING
the stage of excitation of criminal case the availability of criminal justice proof sources of evidence
Show more
18. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 236-239 Issue №8134
FEATURES EVIDENCE THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN CASES OF FRAUD IN THE SPHERE OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
the state prosecution proof fraud in the sphere of entrepreneurial activities
Show more
21. Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 253-255 Issue №11740
NEW IN PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION OF MEDIATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
mediation judicial conciliation negotiations verification of documents the settlement agreement
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 209-213 Issue №4982
SUBSTANTIATION AS A TYPE OF COGNITION AND ITS THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL MEANING
the criminal process proof proof knowledge research evidence
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 178-183 Issue №2615
Scientific and technological progress and the problems of improving criminal procedural legislation
criminal procedure law proof source of evidence documents annexes to the protocols of investigative actions
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 202-206 Issue №6840
TRADITIONAL AND NEW APPROACHES TO THE LEGALLY DEFINITIONS OF "EVIDENCE" IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
the criminal process the comparativism law of evidence proof sources of evidence
Show more
13. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 203-206 Issue №3758
On the intersectoral regulation of circumstances to be proved at the stage of sentence execution
the sentence proof cross-sectoral regulation the circumstances to be proven
Show more
10. Financial law; Tax law; Budgetary law; Administrative law; Administrative process Pages: 192-194 Issue №5975
TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION
prejudice the administrative process proof
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 174-177 Issue №4285
To a question about the kinds of subjects and combating crimes investigation
the opposition investigation proof trial
Show more