PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES
( Pp. 406-409)
More about authors
Bashilov Boris Igorevich
advokat, chlen advokatskoy palaty g. Moskvy, soiskatel. Mesto ucheby: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the institution of proving the existence of grounds for the adoption by arbitration courts of preliminary injunction on corporate disputes. Consideration is given to such aspects as the role of subjective judicial discretion, the estimated nature of the used legislative conceptual apparatus, and the process and scope of necessary proof of the grounds for acceptance of preliminary injunction for corporate disputes.
How to Cite:
Bashilov B.I., (2018), PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 406-409.
Reference list:
Abdulov I.V. Problemy dokazyvaniya nalichiya osnovaniy dlya prinyatiya obespechitel nykh mer v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. № 10.
Abrosimov D.A. Obespechitel nye mery po korporativnym sporam: protsessual nye osobennosti i ogranicheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2017. №21.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002 g. № 30. St. 3012 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 28.12.2017 g.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya1994 g. № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 29.12.2017 g.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami predvaritel nykh obespechitel nykh mer ot 07 iyulya 2004 g. № 78 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004 g. № 8.
Pavlova N.V. Uskorennaya sudebnaya zashchita: predvaritel nye obespechitel nye mery v kommercheskom protsesse. M., 2005.
Pankratov P. A. Nekotorye osobennosti prinyatiya arbitrazhnym sudom obespechitel nykh mer pri rassmotrenii korporativnykh sporov // Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb.: Svoe izdatel stvo, 2016.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O praktike rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zayavleniy o prinyatii obespechitel nykh mer, svyazannykh s zapretom provodit obshchie sobraniya aktsionerov ot 09 iyulya 2003 g. № 11 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2003 g. № 9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O primenenii arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitel nykh mer ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. № 55 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006 g. № 12. s izm. i dop. v red. ot 27.06.2017 g.
Rutkovskaya L.G. Sorazmernost obespechitel nykh mer zayavlennym trebovaniyam // Arbitrazhnye spory, 2016. URL: http://ppt.ru/news/135060 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
Solov eva I. E. Obespechenie iska kak garantiya zashchity prav malogo biznesa // Pravo. Zakonodatel stvo. Lichnost . Saratov, 2012. № 1(14).
Frolova E.E., Karmadonova E.V. Institut professional nogo motivirovannogo suzhdeniya: tendentsii dal neyshego razvitiya i mesto v sisteme bankovskogo prava i zakonodatel stva // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2014. № 20.
Artemyeva Yu.A., Ivanovskaya N.V., Voykova N.A., Frolova E.E. War to the bitter end or finally a compromise Prospects for court approval of tax dispute settlements with the participation of entrepreneurs in Russia // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. 9 (36).
Abrosimov D.A. Obespechitel nye mery po korporativnym sporam: protsessual nye osobennosti i ogranicheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2017. №21.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002 g. № 30. St. 3012 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 28.12.2017 g.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya1994 g. № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301 s izm. i dop. v red. ot 29.12.2017 g.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami predvaritel nykh obespechitel nykh mer ot 07 iyulya 2004 g. № 78 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004 g. № 8.
Pavlova N.V. Uskorennaya sudebnaya zashchita: predvaritel nye obespechitel nye mery v kommercheskom protsesse. M., 2005.
Pankratov P. A. Nekotorye osobennosti prinyatiya arbitrazhnym sudom obespechitel nykh mer pri rassmotrenii korporativnykh sporov // Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb.: Svoe izdatel stvo, 2016.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O praktike rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zayavleniy o prinyatii obespechitel nykh mer, svyazannykh s zapretom provodit obshchie sobraniya aktsionerov ot 09 iyulya 2003 g. № 11 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2003 g. № 9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF O primenenii arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitel nykh mer ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. № 55 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006 g. № 12. s izm. i dop. v red. ot 27.06.2017 g.
Rutkovskaya L.G. Sorazmernost obespechitel nykh mer zayavlennym trebovaniyam // Arbitrazhnye spory, 2016. URL: http://ppt.ru/news/135060 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
Solov eva I. E. Obespechenie iska kak garantiya zashchity prav malogo biznesa // Pravo. Zakonodatel stvo. Lichnost . Saratov, 2012. № 1(14).
Frolova E.E., Karmadonova E.V. Institut professional nogo motivirovannogo suzhdeniya: tendentsii dal neyshego razvitiya i mesto v sisteme bankovskogo prava i zakonodatel stva // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2014. № 20.
Artemyeva Yu.A., Ivanovskaya N.V., Voykova N.A., Frolova E.E. War to the bitter end or finally a compromise Prospects for court approval of tax dispute settlements with the participation of entrepreneurs in Russia // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. 9 (36).
Keywords:
the arbitration process, corporate dispute, interim measures, security measures in corporate dispute, proof, judicial discretion.
