The problem of defining the object rendering knowingly unjust verdict, decision or other judicial act (st.305 Criminal Code)
( Pp. 43-48)

Definition of the crime object, provided st.305 the Criminal Code, will allow further study of the criminal law. The article defines the attributes of justice as a cross-sectoral concept. Peculiarities of justice as an object of criminal law protection, then the species and not-mediocre facilities an offense under the Criminal Code st.305. Kinds of objects of the crime are the public relations developing in the implementation of the activities of the court and the bodies of preliminary investigation, inquest on the goals and justice tasks and direct object - the public relations developing in the implementation of court activities aimed at resolving substantive criminal, civil cases and administrative and constitutional proceedings. Determination of the species and the immediate removal of the object is not known, rightly judgment, decision or other judicial act will allow in the future to specify the subject of the offense, its highlight features Ob-projective hand, additional features of the subject of crime under st.305 the Criminal Code, and eventually offer the legislator option changes the disposition of the studied criminal law.

Gaag I.A., (2016), THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING THE OBJECT RENDERING KNOWINGLY UNJUST VERDICT, DECISION OR OTHER JUDICIAL ACT (ST.305 CRIMINAL CODE). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 43-48.

Vlasov I.S., Tyazhkova, I.M. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. M.: 1968. s. 31.
Denisov S.A. Aktual nye problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya: diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. SPb, 2002. 315s.
Zubkov I.R. Kurs dialekticheskogo materializma. M: izd-vo Universiteta druzhby narodov, 1990. 260s.
Ivanov V.D. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. Rostov - na - Donu.: 1997. s. 6.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. St.118.
Lobanova L.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya: teoreticheskie problemy klassifikatsii i zakonodatel noy reglamentatsii.: Volgograd, 1999. s. 27.
Materialisticheskaya dialektika: kratkiy ocherk teorii. M.: 1980. 430s.
Moskvitina T.A. Nekotorye predlozheniya po sovershenstvovaniyu proekta Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i ee differentsiatsii.: YAroslavl , 1994. 242s.
Nazhimov V.P. Tipy, formy i vidy ugolovnogo protsessa.: Kaliningrad, 1977. 135s.
Novyy illyustrirovannyy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: izd-vo Bol shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya , 1999. 1068s.
Petrukhin I.L., Baturov G.P., Morshchakova T.G. Teoreticheskie osnovy effektivnosti pravosudiya. M.: 1979. 189s.
Pravookhranitel nye organy v SSSR. M.: 1991. 164s
Rzhevskiy V.A., CHepurnov N.M. Sudebnaya vlast v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, konstitutsionnye osnovy organizatsii i deyatel nosti. M.: 1998. 148s.
KHabibullin M.KH. Otvetstvennost za zavedomo lozhnyy donos i zavedomo lozhnoe pokazanie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu.: Kazan , 1975. 160s.
KHloptseva E.YU. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana pravosudiya: diss. k.yu.n., Ekaterinburg. 1995. 210s.
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast / Pod red. akad. V.N. Kudryavtseva, M.: 1997. 400s.

justice, the court, object, species, direct, crime, the sentence, the decision, judicial act, function, activities.