Features of the proving in a criminal case in which pre-trial a cooperation agreement have been concluded
( Pp. 246-248)
More about authors
Pastukhov Pavel Sisoevich
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent kafedry. Mesto raboty: Permskiy gosudarstvennyy nacionalnyy issledovatelskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki.
Perm State National Research University
Perm State National Research University
Abstract:
This article examines the difference in the pre-trial and trial proving the case in which pre-trial agreement was signed on cooperation. The author comes to the conclusion that the inadmissibility of simplifying pre-trial evidence for this category. Judicial proof is based on conventional method of establishing the facts of the case in view of recognition against the accused. However, the Court remains an active subject of proof by an authorized self-check and evaluate all the facts of the case.
How to Cite:
Pastukhov P.S., (2015), FEATURES OF THE PROVING IN A CRIMINAL CASE IN WHICH PRE-TRIAL A COOPERATION AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 246-248.
Reference list:
Abshilava G.V. Ob osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel stva po ugolovnomu delu v otnoshenii obvinyaemogo, s kotorym zaklyucheno dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 3. S. 203-206.
Abshilava G.V. Protsessual naya rol prokurora v zaklyuchenii i realizatsii soglasheniya o dosudebnom sotrudnichestve, reglamentirovannom glavoy 401 UPK // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 3. S. 92-94.
Abshilava G.V. Obespechenie prav poterpevshego pri dosudebnom soglashenii o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 4. S. 111-113.
Abshilava G.V. Rassmotrenie sudom ugolovnogo dela, po kotoromu bylo zaklyucheno dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. №. 4. S. 86-89.
Aleksandrov A.S. Sostyazatel nost i ob ektivnaya istina // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2012. № 3. S. 142-157.
Koneva S.I. Sudebnye doprosy v ugolovnom protsesse: dokazatel stvennoe znachenie i poryadok provedeniya //Avtoref. dis kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2013. S. 6, 13-14.
Abshilava G.V. Protsessual naya rol prokurora v zaklyuchenii i realizatsii soglasheniya o dosudebnom sotrudnichestve, reglamentirovannom glavoy 401 UPK // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 3. S. 92-94.
Abshilava G.V. Obespechenie prav poterpevshego pri dosudebnom soglashenii o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 4. S. 111-113.
Abshilava G.V. Rassmotrenie sudom ugolovnogo dela, po kotoromu bylo zaklyucheno dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. №. 4. S. 86-89.
Aleksandrov A.S. Sostyazatel nost i ob ektivnaya istina // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2012. № 3. S. 142-157.
Koneva S.I. Sudebnye doprosy v ugolovnom protsesse: dokazatel stvennoe znachenie i poryadok provedeniya //Avtoref. dis kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2013. S. 6, 13-14.
Keywords:
pre-trial agreement on cooperation, the criminal process, criminal procedure proving.
