Objective evidence of illicit trafficking potent or toxic substances in order to market
( Pp. 154-156)

More about authors
Akimova Irina Vasilievna adyunkt.; Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava
Moscow University of MIA Russia
Abstract:
Problem: The purpose of writing this article is to analyze the objective evidence of illicit trafficking of potent and toxic substances in order to market. Distinguishes these objects with medications, as well as biologically active additives and doping agents. Differentiated concepts of illicit trafficking and violation of rules governing the production, acquisition, storage, recording, release, transport or delivery of potent and toxic substances. Model: In preparing the articles analyzed item 234 of the Criminal Code (trafficking in strong or poisonous substances for marketing purposes). Conclusions: Analyzed objective evidence of illicit trafficking of potent and toxic substances in order to market will distinguish potent and poisonous substances with drugs, drug products and biologically active additives. The problem of the subject of this crime is that the criminal responsibility of item 234 of the Criminal Code can occur only after the matter will be included in the prescribed manner to the corresponding list of strong or poisonous substances. Without this it is impossible to talk about the presence of signs of the crime in question. Originality / value of the article: Work is intended for faculty members of law schools, post-graduate students, job seekers and students interested in the problem of the subject crime under item 234 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite:
Akimova I.V., (2014), OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE OF ILLICIT TRAFFICKING POTENT OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN ORDER TO MARKET. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 154-156.
Reference list:
Akimova I.V. O ponyatii predmeta prestupleniya v sfere nezakonnogo oborota sil nodeystvuyushchikh ili yadovitykh veshchestv v tselyakh sbyta // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal quot;Black Holes in Russian Legislation, №2, 2014. S.92;
Gutov I.V., Morin A.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za propagandu narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv ili ikh prekursorov, rasteniy i ikh chastey, soderzhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva ili psikhotropnye veshchestva libo ikh prekursory. // Biznes v zakone №4, 2012. S.77
Federal nyy zakon ot 02.01.2000 № 29-FZ O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov . // Rossiyskaya gazeta , № 5, 10.01.2000;
Federal nyy zakon ot 12.04.2010 № 61-FZ Ob obrashchenii lekarstvennykh sredstv // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 19.04.2010, № 16, st. 1815;
Zakon RF ot 14.05.1993 № 4979-1(red. ot 18.07.2011) O veterinarii . // Vedomosti SND i VS RF , 17.06.1993, № 24, st. 857;
Prikaz Minsporta Rossii ot 02.10.2012 № 267 Ob utverzhdenii Obshcherossiyskikh antidopingovykh pravil // Rossiyskaya gazeta quot;, № 254, 02.11.2012;
Pravila khraneniya, ucheta i otpuska yadovitykh i sil nodeystvuyushchikh lekarstvennykh sredstv, prednaznachennykh dlya veterinarnykh tseley (utv. Minsel khozom SSSR 04.08.1967) // Veterinarnoe zakonodatel stvo. Tom II . M., 1972;
Reshenie Komissii Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 28.05.2010 № 299 O primenenii sanitarnykh mer v tamozhennom soyuze // Ofitsial nyy sayt Komissii Tamozhennogo soyuza http://www.tsouz.ru/, 28.06.2010.
Keywords:
objective evidence, the subject of crime, potent substances, poisonous substances, nutritional supplements, doping drugs, medicines, trafficking.