Discussion about the issues of the interrogation of accomplices and determining their procedural status
( Pp. 37-42)

The interrogation of the accomplices in the crime via a dedicated criminal case causes a lot of disputes both within the community of researchers and practitioners. This is partly due to a number of reasons, in particular, the uncertain status of such participants in criminal proceedings, the lack of legislative regulation of this issue, the current enforcement practice, which, incidentally, does not meet the modern needs of the development of law aimed at protecting the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The article States that raised the issue, because there is a significant difference in the approach of law enforcement authority on this issue, and the Supreme court give quite contradictory advice. Although modern research questions the uncertain status of these participants in criminal proceedings is paid attention, however, this is clearly not enough. Based on the analysis of the current legislation, the approaches of legal practitioners, as well as works of other researchers, the authors noted that currently there is a need for amendments to existing legislation. Proposed an author's definition will give the opportunity to resolve a number of issues that are currently not effectively protect the rights of participants in criminal proceedings, and to solve problems of justice.

Volosova N.Y., (2016), DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ISSUES OF THE INTERROGATION OF ACCOMPLICES AND DETERMINING THEIR PROCEDURAL STATUS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 37-42.

Ashirova L.M. Konstitutsionnye i mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy otsenki dokazatel stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / L.M. Ashirova // Ofitsial nyy sayt Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Bashkortostan // URL: http://vs.bkr.sudrf.ru/
Bakin E.A., Aleshina I.F. Doprosy uchastnikov dosudebnogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Nekotorye osobennosti provedeniya proverki pokazaniy na meste / E.A. Bakin, I.F. Aleshina // Zakon. Internet-zhurnal Assotsiatsii yuristov Primor ya // URL: http://law.vl.ru/analit/show m.php id 442 pub
Karpov E.N. Nekotorye napravleniya resheniya problemy nedostatochno opredelennogo protsessual nogo polozheniya sub ektov ugolovnogo protsessa / E.N. Karpov // Biznes v zakone. - 2009. - № 4. - S. 87-90.
Karpov E.N. Nekotorye napravleniya resheniya problemy nedostatochno opredelennogo protsessual nogo polozheniya sub ektov ugolovnogo protsessa / E.N. Karpov // Sovremennoe zakonotvorchestvo i pravoprimenenie. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 60-letiyu yuridicheskogo fakul teta Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (g. Perm , Permskiy universitet, 17 oktyabrya 2008 g.) - Perm : Izd-vo PGU, 2008. - S. 359-363.
Kalinovskiy K.B. Pravila doprosa souchastnikov prestupleniya / K.B. Kalinovskiy // Ugolovnyy protsess. - 2015. - № 3. - S. 9.
Marfitsin P.G. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa s neopredelennym pravovym polozheniem / P.G. Marfitsin // Ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie problemy pravoprimenitel noy deyatel nosti. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. - Omsk: Izd-vo Om. VSHM MVD RF, 1993. - S. 21-27.
Nikulina A.KH., Gorbunova N.A. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa s neopredelennym pravovym polozheniem / A.KH. Nikulina, N.A. Gorbunova // Ugolovnyy protsess. - 2006. - № 7. - S. 19-27
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Karavaeva A.G. o narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami statey 47, 56, 278 i 281 UPK RF: opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 23 dekabrya 2014 goda № 2951-O // URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx
Po zhalobe grazhdanina Baykova Alekseya Alekseevicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav punktom 5 chasti chetvertoy stat i 56, chast yu pervoy stat i 81, punktom 2 chasti vtoroy stat i 82, stat yami 119 i 131 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16 dekabrya 2008 goda N 1036-O-P // URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx
Pravonarusheniya. Ofitsial nyy sayt Rosstata // URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat main/rosstat/ru
Pravila ugolovnogo protsessa shtata Florida: ofits. tekst // URL: http://www.floridabar.org/TFB/TFBResources.nsf/0/BDFE1551AD291A3F85256B29004BF892/ FILE/Criminal.pdf
Svod zakonov SSHA: ofits. tekst // URL: http:// www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks shtata N yu-York: ofits. tekst // URL: http://ypdcrime.com/cpl/article10.htm
Ugolovno-protsessual noe zakonodatel stvo shtata Kaliforniya: ofits. tekst // URL: http:// www. Leginfo.ca.gov/calaw. Html
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks shtata Tekhas: ofits. tekst // URL: http:// tlo2.tic.state.tx.us/statutes/cr.toc.htm
Federal nye pravila ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // URL: http:// www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp
Defense Witness as Accomplice: Should the Trial Judge Give a Care and Caution Instruction // URL: http://ypdcrime.com/cpl/article10.htm
Fishman Clifford S. Defense Witness as Accomplice: Should the Trial Judge Give a Care and Caution Instruction / Clifford S. Fishman // Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. - 2005. - № 1. - R. 1-23
Martinez S. Bargaining for Testimony: Bias of Witnesses Who Testify in Exchange for Leniency / Spencer Martinez // Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals. - 1999. // URL: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol47/iss2/3
Plea-bargain system would not necessarily see justice served // URL: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/views/editorial/AJ201406270038
Witt James W. Non-Coercive Interrogation and the Administration of Criminal Justice: The Impact of Miranda on Police Effectuality / James W. Witt // Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. - 1973. - № 3. - R. 320-332.

the accomplice-co-defendant, separation of a criminal case, uncertain status, a witness with special status, the admissibility of evidence.