Conflict of laws issues on regulation of unjust enrichment obligations under Russian law
( Pp. 120-127)

The article considers the issues of conflict of laws governing unjust enrichment obligations under Russian law. It analyzes the notion “cross-border unjust enrichment obligation”, presents legal expertise of Russian choice of law rules specifying the statute of such obligation, proposals for modifying the respective provisions. The special attention is paid to importance of determining the sphere of application of the law governing unjust enrichment obligations. The methods of research which are used in the article include system, legal comparative, formal juridical, juridical technical ones. The author makes a conclusion that at present the most adequate approach to choice of law is a differentiation of choice of law rules in combination with the law of the state of closest connection, and reasoned a separate choice of law for defining “unjust enrichment” as well as “law of the country where the act or circumstance entailing unjust enrichment occurred” as a subsidiary choice of law with respect to lex loci condictionis (law of the place of unjust enrichment).

Dzhimbeeva D.V., (2015), CONFLICT OF LAWS ISSUES ON REGULATION OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT OBLIGATIONS UNDER RUSSIAN LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 120-127.

A.V. Asoskov. Reforma razdela VI Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2014. № 2.
Grazhdanskoe pravo. Uchebnik v 4-kh tomakh. T.4. Otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. M., Volters Kluver. 2006. Gla-va. 68.
V.S. Em. Obyazatel stva vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya // Zakonodatel stvo. 1999. № 7.
V.P. Zvekov. Kollizii zakonov v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. M., 2007.
V.P. Zvekov. Otdel nye vidy obyazatel stv v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. M.Statut. 2008.
I.S. Zykin. K voprosu o sootnoshenii veshchnogo i obyazatel stvennogo statutov. M. Statut. 2008.
V.A. Kanashevskiy. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2009.
V.A. Kanashevskiy. Vneshneekonomicheskie sdelki: material no-pravovoe i kollizionnoe regulirovanie. - M.: Volters Kluver, 2008.
A.V. Klimovich. Kondiktsionnye obyazatel stva v grazhdanskom prave: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Irkutsk, 2002.
V.V. Kudashkin. K voprosu ob inostrannom elemente v grazhdanskom otnoshenii // SPS Konsul tant-Plyus .
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti tret ey (postateynyy) / T.E.Abova, A.V.Bankovskiy, M.P.Bardina i dr. Pod red. T.E. Abovoy, M.M.Boguslavskogo, A.G. Svetlanova.
Kommentariy k chasti tret ey Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF. Pod red. A.L.Makovskogo i E.A.Sukhanova. Podgotovlen Issledovatel skim tsentrom chastnogo prava.
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RF, chasti tret ey (postateynyy). 3-e izd. Pod red. N.I. Maryshevoy, K.B.YAroshenko. KONTRAKT . INFRA-M . 2010.
L.A. Lunts. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Osobennaya chast . M.: YUrid. lit. 1975.
L.A. Lunts. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave // Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1979. M: Nauka. 1980.
F.F. Martens. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tsivilizovannykh narodov. V 2-kh tomakh. Tom 2 // Pod red. i s bibliograficheskim ocherkom d.yu.n., prof. V.A. Tomsinova. Zertsalo . 2008.
A.S.Mal tsev. Kollizionno-pravovoe regulirovanie transgranichnykh grazhdansko-pravovykh otnosheniy, voznikayushchikh v protsesse elektronnogo vzaimodeystviya. Dis..kand. yurid. nauk. M.2006.
Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Pod red. G.K. Dmitrievoy. Uchebnik. M.2004.
Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Inostrannoe zakonodatel stvo // Predisl.: A.L. Makovskiy; Sost.: A.N. ZHil tsov, A.I. Muranov. - M.: Statut, 2001.
Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v Rossii i Evrosoyuze: Monografiya. (Kniga 1). Pod red. M.M. Boguslavskogo, A.G. Lisitsyna-Svetlanova, A. Trun-ka. M. Norma,2013.
George Panagopoulos. Restitution in Private International Law. Hart Publishing. Oxford Portland-Oregon.2000.
R. Goff and G. Jones. The Law of Restitution (Sweet Maxwell, 1966).

private international law, a foreign element, applicable law, conflict regulation, obligations from unjust enrichment, conflict rules.