On the question of periodization of criminal law within the formation and development of the institutions of the Special Part
( Pp. 191-194)
More about authors
Korablev Roman Nikolaevich
kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: nachalnik fakulteta. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: fakultet zaochnogo obucheniya.
Ufa Institute of Law Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Ufa Institute of Law Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
• Task - To analyze the historical development of criminal law for the purpose of periodization for consideration of questions of formation and development of the special institutions. • Model - used as research methods should be noted general and specific research methods, including historical and legal knowledge of the method, the method of case studies. The basis of the study were scientific works in the field of criminal law, the theory of law and state, philosophy of law. • Conclusion - use the proposed system of periodization of criminal law in the process of addressing issues of formation and development institutions, the special part of criminal law. • Research/the possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work - research is devoted to the analysis of the historical development of criminal law / results can be used in dealing with problems of formation and development institutions, special part in the proposed times. • The practical significance - statements and conclusions set forth in the study may be used in the teaching of the discipline as a single criminal law and points of view on the matter under consideration. • Originality / value - trained scientific - diskussionnye article contains questions addressed to all those interested in the problems of the evolution of institutions, special part of criminal law.
How to Cite:
Korablev R.N., (2015), ON THE QUESTION OF PERIODIZATION OF CRIMINAL LAW WITHIN THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE SPECIAL PART. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 191-194.
Reference list:
Belogrits-Kotlyarevskiy L. S. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti. Kiev, 1903. S. 59-60.
Boyko A. I. Sistema i struktura ugolovnogo prava. V 3 t. T. 3. Struktura ugolovnogo prava i ego identifikatsiya v natsional noy yurisprudentsii. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008.
Vladimirskiy-Budanov M. F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. Rostov-na-Donu, 1995. S. 306.
D yakonov M. Ocherki istorii russkogo prava. Istoriya ugolovnogo prava i sudoproizvodstva. YUr ev, 1905. S.1, 37, 64.
ZHuk M. S. Uchenie ob institutakh rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: kontseptual nye osnovy i perspektivy razvitiya: monografiya. M.: YUrlitinform, 2013.
Kistyakovskiy A. F. Elementarnyy uchebnik obshchego ugolovnogo prava. Kiev, 1882. S.10.
Kogan V. M. Sotsial nyy mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya. M., 1983. S. 73.
Komissarov A. N. Ugolovnyy zakon // Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast . Uchebnik / Pod red. B. V. Zdravomyslova. M., 2000. S.28.
Konyakhin V. P. Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya Obshchey chasti rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2002.
Naumov A. V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: YUrlitinform, 2014.
Pudovochkin YU. E. Uchenie ob ugolovnom zakone: lektsii. M.: YUrlitinform, 2014.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast : uchebnik / pod red. V. D. Men shagina. 4-e izd. pererab. M., 1948. S. 14-163.
Ugolovnoe pravo: istoriya i sovremennost . Voprosy Obshchey chasti: uchebnoe posobie / pod red. T. G. Daurovoy. Saratov, 2001. S. 5.
CHerepnin L. V. Voprosy metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya. M., 1981. S. 272.
CHuchaev A.I. Probely v metodakh nauki ugolovnogo prava // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. №2, 2008. S. 192.
SHishkin A.A. Sravnitel nyy istoriko-pravovoy analiz instituta smyagchayushchikh obstoyatel stv v zakonodatel stve dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii // Biznes v zakone. № 2, 2011.
Kazamirov A.I. Sistema prestupleniy protiv svobody cheloveka vo vzglyadakh vedushchikh uchenykh v oblasti ugolovnogo prava nachala XX veka (dorevolyutsionnyy period) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 1, 2015.
Boyko A. I. Sistema i struktura ugolovnogo prava. V 3 t. T. 3. Struktura ugolovnogo prava i ego identifikatsiya v natsional noy yurisprudentsii. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008.
Vladimirskiy-Budanov M. F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. Rostov-na-Donu, 1995. S. 306.
D yakonov M. Ocherki istorii russkogo prava. Istoriya ugolovnogo prava i sudoproizvodstva. YUr ev, 1905. S.1, 37, 64.
ZHuk M. S. Uchenie ob institutakh rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: kontseptual nye osnovy i perspektivy razvitiya: monografiya. M.: YUrlitinform, 2013.
Kistyakovskiy A. F. Elementarnyy uchebnik obshchego ugolovnogo prava. Kiev, 1882. S.10.
Kogan V. M. Sotsial nyy mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya. M., 1983. S. 73.
Komissarov A. N. Ugolovnyy zakon // Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast . Uchebnik / Pod red. B. V. Zdravomyslova. M., 2000. S.28.
Konyakhin V. P. Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya Obshchey chasti rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2002.
Naumov A. V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: YUrlitinform, 2014.
Pudovochkin YU. E. Uchenie ob ugolovnom zakone: lektsii. M.: YUrlitinform, 2014.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast : uchebnik / pod red. V. D. Men shagina. 4-e izd. pererab. M., 1948. S. 14-163.
Ugolovnoe pravo: istoriya i sovremennost . Voprosy Obshchey chasti: uchebnoe posobie / pod red. T. G. Daurovoy. Saratov, 2001. S. 5.
CHerepnin L. V. Voprosy metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya. M., 1981. S. 272.
CHuchaev A.I. Probely v metodakh nauki ugolovnogo prava // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. №2, 2008. S. 192.
SHishkin A.A. Sravnitel nyy istoriko-pravovoy analiz instituta smyagchayushchikh obstoyatel stv v zakonodatel stve dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii // Biznes v zakone. № 2, 2011.
Kazamirov A.I. Sistema prestupleniy protiv svobody cheloveka vo vzglyadakh vedushchikh uchenykh v oblasti ugolovnogo prava nachala XX veka (dorevolyutsionnyy period) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 1, 2015.
Keywords:
criminal law, the history of criminal law, the Institute of the special part of criminal law.
