Actual problems of contractual representation in the civil procedure of the Russian Federation
( Pp. 403-405)

Background. The subject of the judicial representation has already been the subject of dissertation research, but since the writing of most of them more than 10 years have passed, during which there were many significant events: the adoption Of the code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation, the publication Of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from 21.01.2016 № 1 «on some issues of the application of legislation on reimbursement of costs associated with the case», the development of the Concept of the unified civil procedure code of the Russian Federation, The concept of regulation of the market of professional legal assistance. However, due scientific study of the above events have not received. Therefore, the purpose of this article is an attempt to eliminate this gap in legal science. Materials and methods. In this article, the authors have identified the most relevant to date problems of legal regulation of contractual representation in the civil court procedure and offered their own solutions. Results. The lawyer (and it is the lawyer, not the legal) monopoly on judicial representation is a reasonable proposal, but requires detailed study and serious reform of the bar in the Russian Federation. Also offer: limit the possibility of reducing the court on its own initiative the amount of legal costs for the services of a representative in the arbitration process in the absence of objections of the opposite party; determine the recommended minimum number / percentage parameters for determining the amount of costs to be recovered; exclude limitation on reimbursement of costs for services of a third party representative. It is proposed to lead to a uniformity of the rule on the powers and the order of their registration in different trials. Originality / value. This article can be useful for both legal scholars and legal practitioners engaged in judicial representation.

Gayfutdinova R.Z., (2018), ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF CONTRACTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 403-405.

CHelyshev M.YU., Valeev D.KH. Aktual nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa. Po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii // Zakon. 2006. № 12. S. 116-119.
KHalatov Sergey Aleksandrovich. Problemy predstavitel stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.03 : Ekaterinburg, 2000 191 c. RGB OD, 61:01-12/574-7
Sidorov Roman Anatol evich. Predstavitel stvo v grazhdanskom protsesse : Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.15 : Tver , 2002 165 c. RGB OD, 61:03-12/899-7
Tabak Irina Aleksandrovna. Novye polozheniya sudebnogo predstavitel stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : dis.. kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.15 Saratov, 2006 223 s. RGB OD, 61:07-12/30
Koroleva Svetlana Olegovna. Predstavitel stvo storon i tret ikh lits v arbitrazhnom protsesse : dissertatsiya.. kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk : 12.00.15. - Moskva, 2007. - 160 s. RGB OD, 61:07-12/1582
Bogomolov Mikhail Valer evich. Institut sudebnogo (protsessual nogo) predstavitel stva v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dissertatsiya.. kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk: 12.00.15 / Bogomolov Mikhail Valer evich; Mesto zashchity: Rossiyskaya akademiya narodnogo khozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii .- Saratov, 2014.- 202 s.

civil process, contractual litigation.