JUDICIAL PENALTY TO THE EXPLANATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 252-254)

The article discusses the issue of the right of the court at the request of the creditor to adjudge in his favor a sum of money in case of default of the judicial act on the compulsion to fulfill obligations in kind. The author analyzes the explanation of the Russian Supreme Court on the substantive judicial penalties as Institute of civil law and refers to the challenges facing civil legal science in connection with the addition of civil law a new way of protection of the rights of the creditor on the obligation.

Paraskevova D.V., (2016), JUDICIAL PENALTY TO THE EXPLANATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 252-254.

Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov UNIDRUA 2010 / per.: A. S. Komarov. M., 2013. S. 251.
O nekotorykh voprosakh prisuzhdeniya vzyskatelyu denezhnykh sredstv za neispolnenie sudebnogo akta: Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 04.04.2014 № 22 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2014. № 6.
O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 № 7 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2016. № 70.
Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami stat i 414 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF: Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 21.12.2005 № 103 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2006. № 4.

protection of the rights of lender, the performance of an obligation, the trial penalty.