The principles of judicial activity in the Russian Federation
( Pp. 145-148)

The subject of research is principles of judicial activity. The object of research is the judicial activity. The author considers in detail aspects such as the differentiation of two types of judicial activities: justice and administrative activities to ensure its implementation. Appreciated theoretical developments of the Soviet period that judicial activities are based on the synthesis sudoustroystvennoy, procedural and administrative-regulatory principles. On this methodological basis, basic and optional principles of modern judicial activities conducted by their differentiation with the principles of the implementation of the judiciary, administration of justice, identified the commonality of approaches. Special attention is paid to the analysis of discussions on the issue revealed their informative and scholastic elements, indicated on the dialectical principles of diversity and the impossibility of constructing their closed list. Criticized theoretical developments in the direction of constructing "new" principles: transparentnosti, etc., as well as distribution policies for trial activities. The necessity is shown, the system permits two types of problems of increasing judicial efficiency. The research methodology includes analysis of the current procedural legislation, normative acts that regulate organizational activity in the courts, as well as doctrinal sources. The main conclusions of the study are: author's understanding of the definition of "judicial activity", differencirovannoe from the concept of "judicial power". The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the principles of independence of judicial activities considered as derived from the provisions of article 10 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Performed differentiation of the concepts "autonomy" and "independence" of the branches of government and the judiciary in particular. The conclusion is that we are talking about independence as about the isolation of one branch from another, structurally and institutionally, functionally, competention and resource, in the absence of relations of subordination between them in the implementation of their own authority.

Voronin S.A., (2016), THE PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 145-148.

Abrosimova E. B. Sudebnaya vlast v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sistema i printsipy. M., 2002. 160 c.
Akisheva ZH. L. Garantii realizatsii printsipa nezavisimosti sudey i podchineniya ikh tol ko zakonu v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: diss kand. yurid. nauk. 12.00.03. M., 1991. 228 s.
Afanas eva S.I. Konstitutsionno-pravovye garantii printsipa nezavisimosti sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2003. 177 c.
Gravina A.A., Kashepov V.P., Makarova O.V. Konstitutsionnye printsipy sudebnoy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii/ Otv. red. V.P. Kashepov. M.: ID YUrisprudentsiya , 2011. 296 s.
Doroshkov V. V. Mirovoy sud ya. Istoricheskie, organizatsionnye i protsessual nye aspekty deyatel nosti. M., 2004.
Kolokolov N. A. Sudebnyy kontrol v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: real nost , perspektivy//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1998. № 11. S. 31-39.
Kuznetsov M. YU. Realizatsiya kontrol noy funktsii sudebnoy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. 27 s.
Lebedev V. M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoy neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritel nom sledstvii: ucheb. posobie. M., 2001. 158 c.
Marchenko M.N. Osnovnye printsipy organizatsii i deyatel nosti sudebnoy sistemy Evropeyskogo Soyuza// Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2010. № 3. s. 4 - 12.
Motovilovker YA. O. O printsipakh ob ektivnoy istiny, prezumptsii nevinovnosti i sostyazatel nosti protsessa. YAroslavl , 1978. 96 c.
Noskov I.YU. Ob osobennom i obshchem v soderzhanii ponyatiy nezavisimost sudebnoy vlasti, sud i i samostoyatel nost sudebnoy vlasti, sud i // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2013. № 1. s. 39 - 42.
Otvet V.D. Zor kina na Pis mo Prezidiuma Soveta sudey Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10 fevralya 2011 goda// Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 15 fevralya.
Postanovleniya Mintruda RF i Minyusta RF ot 27 iyunya 1996 g. N 41a/06-74-124 i N 41a/06-74-125 O normakh nagruzki sudey i rabotnikov apparata sudov sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Normy nagruzki sudey, sudebnykh ispolniteley i rabotnikov apparata rayonnykh (gorodskikh) sudov .
Putin V.V. Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva// Kommersant . 2012. 6 fevralya.
CHechot D. M. Pravovoe gosudarstvo v SSSR i sovershenstvovanie grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva// Pravovedenie. 1991. № 4. S. 4 - 12.
SHelomanova L. V. Nezavisimost sudey kak konstitutsionnyy printsip pravosudiya: avtoref. diss kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.02. Belgorod, 2013. 22 s.
Solov ev V.N. Printsipy otkrytosti i publichnosti pri osushchestvlenii sudebnoy deyatel nosti// Zakon. 2010. № 6. S. 8-13.
Goncharov A.A. Realizatsiya printsipa narodovlastiya v organizatsii i deyatel nosti sudebnoy vlasti Rossii: avtoref. diss kand. yurid. nauk. Belgorod, 2008. 24 s.
SHadrin D. N. Sudebnaya deyatel nost : sushchnost , printsipy// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 5. S. 298-302.

judicial activities, the judiciary, the judicial system, the court, principles, a fair trial.