ABOUT THE REASON IMPEDIMENTAL TO SATISFACTORY PERMISSION OF PROBLEMS OF "HONESTY" ARE IN CIVIL LAW
( Pp. 74-79)
More about authors
Popov V.S.
Podrazdelenie: kafedra prava
Chelyabinsk State University Kozhevnikov Konstantin Alexandrovich soiskatel. Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel.; Podrazdelenie: kafedra prava.
Chelyabinsk state university. Branch: Kostanay branch (Republic of Kazakhstan)
Chelyabinsk State University Kozhevnikov Konstantin Alexandrovich soiskatel. Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel.; Podrazdelenie: kafedra prava.
Chelyabinsk state university. Branch: Kostanay branch (Republic of Kazakhstan)
Abstract:
"Honesty" is acknowledged in a civil law, nevertheless, the presence of normative does not have in it. "Honesty" is not set forth as principle and is not invested in the formula of presumption and even is not presented here by another normative construction which declared as one of the "basic of beginning" of civil legislation before. There is an omission in a right. It is a circumstance on determination is removable, and invocatory to exigentness of removal. However it does not take place long time and a consensus on this occasion does not present nowadays. And reason obviously is not here, in defecting scientific- theoretically material. It is necessary to suppose that to extrapolate "honesty" in an operating right from a right Roman, objective factors prevent for it, even having regard to efforts of civilists. But it is a factor, but the factor, perchance, has irresistible force. We suppose, such factor is incompatibility (or baffling complexity of combination) of moral and ethical metaphysical on the nature, phenomena of "honesty" with rationality of positive right. The impossibility (difficulty) of rational presentation and description of "honesty" as a legal category over legal norms could not bring to alienation from her - from one side, but also, on the other hand, could not bring to the loss of possibility of going beyond literally certain a law scopes. The necessity of bringing an operating right over is thus realized in accordance with present realities: it must be some inspired, "humanize". Attempts of searching for of satisfactory interpretation of "honesty", in the civil law of inculcated, that is why to proceed. The attempts of searching for of the satisfactory interpretation of "honesty" inculcated in a civil law continue to conduct nowadays.
How to Cite:
Popov V.., Kozhevnikov K.A., (2014), ABOUT THE REASON IMPEDIMENTAL TO SATISFACTORY PERMISSION OF PROBLEMS OF "HONESTY" ARE IN CIVIL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 74-79.
Reference list:
Bogdanov E.V. Kategoriya dobrosovestnosti v grazhdanskom prave.// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. - 1999, № 9. - s. 12- 14.
Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kn. 1. M., 2000. - s. 189.
Gadzhiev G.A. Ontologiya prava (kriticheskoe issledovanie yuridicheskogo kontsepta deystvitel nosti): monografiya. M., Norma, INFRA-M, 2013. - s. 320.
Gadzhiev G.A. Interv yu. // YUridicheskiy spravochnik rukovoditelya. - 2004, № 11. S. 23.
Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. M., 1992. - s. 321.
Emel yanov V.I. Razumnost , dobrosovestnost , nezloupotreblenie grazhdanskimi pravami. M., 2002. - s. 117.
Isaev I.A. Tenevaya storona zakona. Irratsional noe v prave: monografiya. M., Progress, 2013 - s. 368.
Krasnova S.A. Opredelenie ponyatiya dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2003, № 3. S. 66.
Novikov M.V. Ponyatie dobrosovestnosti v grazhdanskom prave: teoreticheskiy analiz // Molodoy uchyenyy. - 2012, № 1 (t.2) - s. 41-43.
Ryzhenkov A.YA. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v obnovlyennom grazhdanskom zakonodatel stve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013, № 3. - s. 68- 71.
Sviridenko O.M. Internet-interv yu. // Arbitrazhnyy sud g. Moskvy. 70 let. Problemy i perspektivy Elektronnyy resurs .URL: http://www.consultant.ru /(7.03.2011).
Tatarnikov A.V. Printsipy razumnosti i dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoref. diss. kand. yur. nauk. Tekst Zaklyuchenie: p. 6. M., 2010. Elektronnyy resurs .URL: http://www.dissercat. cat.com/ content/printsipy-rasumnosti-i-dobrosovestnosti-v-grazhdanskom-prave-rossii/
Gegel G.V.F. Filosofiya prava: perevod s nem. M., Mysl , 1990. - s. 524.
KHaydegger M. Bytiye i vremya: perevod s nem. SPb., 2009. - s. 321.
Monten M.E. Opyty. Izbrannye glavy: perevod s fr. M., Pravda, 1991. - s. 665.
Popov V.S., Popova I.V. Kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch : v tom chisle, predostavlyaemaya besplatno, kak garantirovannoe konstitutsiey pravo kazhdogo // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №1.
Mel nikov V.YU. Kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch - garantiya zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012 - №1.
Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kn. 1. M., 2000. - s. 189.
Gadzhiev G.A. Ontologiya prava (kriticheskoe issledovanie yuridicheskogo kontsepta deystvitel nosti): monografiya. M., Norma, INFRA-M, 2013. - s. 320.
Gadzhiev G.A. Interv yu. // YUridicheskiy spravochnik rukovoditelya. - 2004, № 11. S. 23.
Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. M., 1992. - s. 321.
Emel yanov V.I. Razumnost , dobrosovestnost , nezloupotreblenie grazhdanskimi pravami. M., 2002. - s. 117.
Isaev I.A. Tenevaya storona zakona. Irratsional noe v prave: monografiya. M., Progress, 2013 - s. 368.
Krasnova S.A. Opredelenie ponyatiya dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2003, № 3. S. 66.
Novikov M.V. Ponyatie dobrosovestnosti v grazhdanskom prave: teoreticheskiy analiz // Molodoy uchyenyy. - 2012, № 1 (t.2) - s. 41-43.
Ryzhenkov A.YA. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v obnovlyennom grazhdanskom zakonodatel stve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013, № 3. - s. 68- 71.
Sviridenko O.M. Internet-interv yu. // Arbitrazhnyy sud g. Moskvy. 70 let. Problemy i perspektivy Elektronnyy resurs .URL: http://www.consultant.ru /(7.03.2011).
Tatarnikov A.V. Printsipy razumnosti i dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoref. diss. kand. yur. nauk. Tekst Zaklyuchenie: p. 6. M., 2010. Elektronnyy resurs .URL: http://www.dissercat. cat.com/ content/printsipy-rasumnosti-i-dobrosovestnosti-v-grazhdanskom-prave-rossii/
Gegel G.V.F. Filosofiya prava: perevod s nem. M., Mysl , 1990. - s. 524.
KHaydegger M. Bytiye i vremya: perevod s nem. SPb., 2009. - s. 321.
Monten M.E. Opyty. Izbrannye glavy: perevod s fr. M., Pravda, 1991. - s. 665.
Popov V.S., Popova I.V. Kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch : v tom chisle, predostavlyaemaya besplatno, kak garantirovannoe konstitutsiey pravo kazhdogo // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - №1.
Mel nikov V.YU. Kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch - garantiya zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012 - №1.
Keywords:
"good faith in civil law" as a problem, the factor preventing its satisfactory resolution, the possibility of defining "good faith" as a category of positive law.
Related Articles
