THE QUALIFID LEGAL ASSISTANCE”: INCLUDING PROVIDED FOR THOSE WHO NEED IT FOR FREE AS GUARANTED RIGHT OF EVERY CITIZEN BY CONSTITUTION
( Pp. 28-34)
More about authors
Popov V.S.
Podrazdelenie: kafedra prava
Chelyabinsk State University Popova Irina Valerievna studentka. Fakultet: yuridicheskiy
South Urals state scientific research University
Chelyabinsk State University Popova Irina Valerievna studentka. Fakultet: yuridicheskiy
South Urals state scientific research University
Abstract:
The right of every person to receive qualified help spelled out in the cases provided for persons in need for free is a constitutional law. Initially, with the Basic Law, mates with “skilled care” with “everyone”; the term is used "legal help" when it is provided about free of charge. But, there’re two such terms is not identical. There is a surmise that the qualified “legal assistance” provides for citizens who need it for free but it’s not "a qualified legal assistance ", formally finds a confirmation in the legislation that defines mechanisms for providing legal assistance. There is the Federal Law in Russia about “free legal aid in the Russian Federation” and the Law in Republic of Kazakhstan tells us "about the State-guaranteed legal assistance" while every person has a right to get a qualified help which is written in the Basic Law (Russia Federation and Republic of Kazakhstan ). Every constitutional regulation has “the highest legal force," which means it fundamental to any other legal provisions. The Laws of both states do not answer the constitutional norm with their names "supreme legal force".
How to Cite:
Popov V.., Popova I.V., (2014), THE QUALIFID LEGAL ASSISTANCE”: INCLUDING PROVIDED FOR THOSE WHO NEED IT FOR FREE AS GUARANTED RIGHT OF EVERY CITIZEN BY CONSTITUTION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 28-34.
Reference list:
Konstitutsiey Rossiyskoy Federatsii, prinyatoy vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda; i Konstitutsiey Respubliki Kazakhstan, prinyatoy na respublikanskom referendume 30 avgusta 1995 goda.
Takoe ikh opredelenie normativno vyrazheno v st. 64 Konstitutsii RF.
V Konstitutsii RK eto chast 1 st. 39. Analogichnye polozheniya soderzhatsya v chasti 3 st. 55 i v chasti 1 st. 56 Konstitutsii RF.
Sm. ob etom chast 2 st. 56 Konstitutsii RF.
Konstitutsiya RF: chast 2 eye st. 55.
V Konstitutsii RF oba nazvannykh priznaka vsyakoy konstitutsionnoy normy zakrepleny v chasti 1 eye st. 15, a primenitel no k pravam i svobodam cheloveka i grazhdanina - v eye st. 18. V Konstitutsii RK sm. ob etom chast 2 st. 4, a takzhe chast 2 st. 12.
Sm. ob etom polozhenie chasti 3 st. 270 GK RK; v GK RF - chasti 3 st. 308.
Panchenko V.YU. YUridicheskaya pomoshch (voprosy obshchey teorii): monografiya. Krasnoyarsk, izd. Sibirskogo FGU. 2011. - 279 s. (Obrashchaem vnimanie na nazvanie monografii). 20- 1. Tam zhe, s. 108. 20- 2. Tam zhe, s. 108. 20- 2. Tam zhe, s. 108.
21. Tam zhe, s. 270.
22. Tam zhe, s. 275.
Ob institute krayney neobkhodimosti sm., v pervuyu ochered , st. 34 UK RK (st. 39 UK RF).
Sm. bukva ubivaet, a dukh zhivotvorit (2 Kor. 3.6).
Konstitutsiya RK: ch. 1 st. 1; Konstitutsiya RF: ch. 1 st. 7.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: st. 1.
Mukhudinova N.R. Obespechenie konstitutsionnogo prava kazhdogo na poluchenie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi: monografiya. Saransk, izd. Mordovskogo GU. 2008. - 188 s. (Takzhe obrashchaem vnimanie na nazvanie monografii).
Federal nyy zakon RF ot 21 noyabrya 2011 goda № 324 O besplatnoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii . V ego polozheniyakh, nesmotrya na nazvanie, ispol zuetsya takzhe leksema kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch . Zakon RK № 122- V ot 3 iyunya 2013 goda O garantirovannoy gosudarstvom yuridicheskoy pomoshchi . Ponyatie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi zdes ne ispol zuetsya.
Popov V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya reabilitatsiya ili vozmeshchenie vreda, nezakonno prichinyennogo organami, osushchestvlyavshimi proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №1.
Popov V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya reabilitatsiya i reabilitatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №2.
Popov V.S. Reabilitatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse: o eye sushchnosti i soderzhanii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №5.
Popov V.S. Osnovaniya dopustimosti v ugolovnom proizvodstve ego uchastnika, uslovno imenuemogo advokatom svidetelya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №1.
Popov V.S. Usloviya dopustimosti v ugolovnom proizvodstve ego uchastnika, assotsiirovannogo so svidetelem // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №3.
Popov V.S. Sub ekty ugolovno-protsessual noy zashchity: advokaty i/ili odin iz blizkikh rodstvennikov obvinyaemogo ili inoe litso // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №6.
Popov V.S. Priznaki mnimosti i pritvornosti sub ekta ugolovnogo protsessa // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №6.
Popov V.S., Popova I.V. Osmyslenie sushchnosti i soderzhaniya advokatury v preddverii eye raskola v Kazakhstane // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №6.
Takoe ikh opredelenie normativno vyrazheno v st. 64 Konstitutsii RF.
V Konstitutsii RK eto chast 1 st. 39. Analogichnye polozheniya soderzhatsya v chasti 3 st. 55 i v chasti 1 st. 56 Konstitutsii RF.
Sm. ob etom chast 2 st. 56 Konstitutsii RF.
Konstitutsiya RF: chast 2 eye st. 55.
V Konstitutsii RF oba nazvannykh priznaka vsyakoy konstitutsionnoy normy zakrepleny v chasti 1 eye st. 15, a primenitel no k pravam i svobodam cheloveka i grazhdanina - v eye st. 18. V Konstitutsii RK sm. ob etom chast 2 st. 4, a takzhe chast 2 st. 12.
Sm. ob etom polozhenie chasti 3 st. 270 GK RK; v GK RF - chasti 3 st. 308.
Panchenko V.YU. YUridicheskaya pomoshch (voprosy obshchey teorii): monografiya. Krasnoyarsk, izd. Sibirskogo FGU. 2011. - 279 s. (Obrashchaem vnimanie na nazvanie monografii). 20- 1. Tam zhe, s. 108. 20- 2. Tam zhe, s. 108. 20- 2. Tam zhe, s. 108.
21. Tam zhe, s. 270.
22. Tam zhe, s. 275.
Ob institute krayney neobkhodimosti sm., v pervuyu ochered , st. 34 UK RK (st. 39 UK RF).
Sm. bukva ubivaet, a dukh zhivotvorit (2 Kor. 3.6).
Konstitutsiya RK: ch. 1 st. 1; Konstitutsiya RF: ch. 1 st. 7.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: st. 1.
Mukhudinova N.R. Obespechenie konstitutsionnogo prava kazhdogo na poluchenie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi: monografiya. Saransk, izd. Mordovskogo GU. 2008. - 188 s. (Takzhe obrashchaem vnimanie na nazvanie monografii).
Federal nyy zakon RF ot 21 noyabrya 2011 goda № 324 O besplatnoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii . V ego polozheniyakh, nesmotrya na nazvanie, ispol zuetsya takzhe leksema kvalifitsirovannaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch . Zakon RK № 122- V ot 3 iyunya 2013 goda O garantirovannoy gosudarstvom yuridicheskoy pomoshchi . Ponyatie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi zdes ne ispol zuetsya.
Popov V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya reabilitatsiya ili vozmeshchenie vreda, nezakonno prichinyennogo organami, osushchestvlyavshimi proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №1.
Popov V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya reabilitatsiya i reabilitatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №2.
Popov V.S. Reabilitatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse: o eye sushchnosti i soderzhanii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №5.
Popov V.S. Osnovaniya dopustimosti v ugolovnom proizvodstve ego uchastnika, uslovno imenuemogo advokatom svidetelya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №1.
Popov V.S. Usloviya dopustimosti v ugolovnom proizvodstve ego uchastnika, assotsiirovannogo so svidetelem // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №3.
Popov V.S. Sub ekty ugolovno-protsessual noy zashchity: advokaty i/ili odin iz blizkikh rodstvennikov obvinyaemogo ili inoe litso // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №6.
Popov V.S. Priznaki mnimosti i pritvornosti sub ekta ugolovnogo protsessa // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012. - №6.
Popov V.S., Popova I.V. Osmyslenie sushchnosti i soderzhaniya advokatury v preddverii eye raskola v Kazakhstane // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №6.
Keywords:
"qualified legal assistance", right to it "each", "legal assistance" provided for free, the need for a new edition of the constitutional norm.
Related Articles
