CIVIL CONFISCATION AND THE INVIOLABILITY OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
( Pp. 130-133)

Reform of modern civil law, the ambiguity of the theoretical and practical problems arising in law enforcement with regard to termination of ownership determines the relevance of this article. Establishing another, unrelated to the criminal law, civil forfeiture as a statutory uncompensated seizure of property from the owner by a court in Russia income as a measure of effective anti-corruption policies, widely implemented by the state today. This problem was addressed in the work of John. Simsera [15], Art. Caselli [13], E. Kay, Jean-Pierre Brunet, L. Gray, K. Stevenson, K. Scott [12], the analytical department of the European Union, the European Parliament [14], etc. The scientific problem is defined by the author of the proposal to fix the rate in the Russian legislation on civil forfeiture of the right as a property sanction without the involvement of a person to criminal liability, has undergone such as «punishment» aimed not at the deprivation of rights and freedoms, and the deprivation of its property. n doing so, the confiscation should not violate the principle of the rule of private property, guaranteed both by Article 35 of the Constitution and a number of articles of the Civil Code. Value article is the ability to use its results in the implementation of existing law and the instructions of the Russian President in the part of the counteraction of corruption in Russia, especially in the framework of international cooperation against corruption in incorporating the provisions of international agreements and conventions against corruption, which is a party to the Russia.

Bagavudinov S.G., (2017), CIVIL CONFISCATION AND THE INVIOLABILITY OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 130-133.

Konstitutsiya RF, prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 N 11-FKZ) // SZ RF, 14.04.2014, N 15, st. 1691.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob edinennykh Natsiy protiv korruptsii (zaklyuchena v N yu-Yorke 31.10.2003, ratifitsirovana s zayavleniyami Federal nym zakonom ot 08.03.2006 №40-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 26 iyunya 2006 g. №26. St. 2780.
Konventsiya ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu (zaklyuchena v Strasburge 27.01.1999, ratifitsirovana Federal nym zakonom ot 25.07.2006 №125-FZ) //Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 18.05.2009, №20, st. 2394.
Konventsiya po bor be s podkupom inostrannykh dolzhnostnykh lits pri osushchestvlenii mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh sdelok (zaklyuchena 21.11.1997, Rossiya prisoedinilas Federal nym zakonom ot 01.02.2012 №3-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23 aprelya 2012 g. N 17. St. 1899.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks RF (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 №51-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2016) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, №238-239, 08.12.1994.
Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 №195-FZ (red. ot 2812.2016) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, №256, 31.12.2001.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RF ot 14.11.2002 №138-FZ (red. ot 19.12.2016) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, №220, 20.11.2002.
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF ot 08.03.2015 №21-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) // Ofitsial nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii. Elektronnyy resurs : http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 09.03.2015 (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2017).
Federal nyy zakon ot 03.12.2012 №230-FZ (red. ot 03.11.2015) O kontrole za sootvetstviem raskhodov lits, zameshchayushchikh gosudarstvennye dolzhnosti, i inykh lits ikh dokhodam // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 10.12.2012, №50 (chast 4), st. 6953.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 29.11.2016 №26-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti podpunkta 8 punkta 2 stat i 235 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i stat i 17 Federal nogo zakona quot;O kontrole za sootvetstviem raskhodov lits, zameshchayushchikh gosudarstvennye dolzhnosti, i inykh lits ikh dokhodam quot; v svyazi s zaprosom Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Bashkortostan quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 12.12.2016, N 50, st. 7169.
Elektronnyy resurs : https://zakon.ru/discussion/ 2015/4/7/grazhdanskaya konfiskaciya vmesto ugolovnoj institut zakonodatelstva predlozhil zamenu st 20 konven (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2017).
Martynenko, E.V. Normativno-pravovaya model konfiskatsii imushchestva kak inoy mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2009. - № 2(11). S. 116-124.
Ovchinskiy, V.S. Bez konfiskatsii net bor by s korruptsiey // Moskovskaya pravda. 2011. - 23 iyunya. S. 3-5.
Brun J.-R., Gray L., Scott Cl., Stephenson K. Asset Recovery Handbook A Guide for Practitioners. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank. 2011. Elektronnyy resurs : https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/ar handbook final.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2017).
Cassella, S., Asset Forfeiture Law in the United States (Huntington, N.Y.: JurisNet, 2007).
Impact Study on Civil Forfeiture. Council of Europe, 2013. Elektronnyy resurs : http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/ cooperation/ economiccrime/ corruption n/Publications/ CAR/Impact 20Study 20on 20Civil 20Forfeiture EN.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2017).
Jeffrey Simser Perspectives on Civil Forfeiture , Hong Kong University publ. (2008). See Simser, J., The Significance of Money Laundering: the Example of the Philippines (2006), Journal of Money Laundering Control.

civil forfeiture, compulsory withdrawal, illegal income, corruption.