Problems of qualification of favorite false indications, conclusions of an expert, specialist or incorrect transfer
( Pp. 269-272)
More about authors
Akkaeva Halimat Alievna
Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate professor, Police Colonel, head of the department of special technical disciplines
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
Abstract:
The establishment of objective truth in the course of the administration of justice is carried out on the basis of evidence, among which special importance is attached to the testimony and conclusions of experts and specialists. Official translations of texts, documents, etc. also take an important place in the evidence base. At the same time, they must meet the criterion of reliability, non-compliance with which entails the recognition of evidence as inadmissible, and the subjects who provided them are subject to criminal liability under Art. 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The indicated evidence is characterized by specific features arising from the object of encroachment, which includes the normal functioning of the justice system. The article analyzes the criteria for recognizing testimonies, opinions of experts, specialists, translation results as false, among which the main criterion is knowingness, reveals the delimitation of their falsity from erroneousness, and also analyzes the term "conscientious delusion" and its use when qualifying an act under Art. 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Despite the proliferation of cases of criminal prosecution for knowingly false testimony, conclusions, and incorrect translation in law enforcement, there remain a number of unresolved significant issues related to the qualification of the actions of the perpetrators. In particular, at present, the law does not provide for the commission of the crime considered in the article in the form of inaction, which creates difficulties for law enforcement officers when qualifying the offense by special subjects with procedural status. The purpose of this study is to identify problems that arise during the qualification of the actions of experts, specialists and translators who knowingly give false testimony, conclusions or incorrect translation. To achieve this goal, the author analyzed the specifics of the qualification of the crime in question, on the basis of which it was concluded that it is advisable to consolidate this form of criminal behavior in this case as inaction at the legislative level, which will avoid possible obstacles in qualifying the crime in question.
How to Cite:
Akkaeva H.A., (2020), PROBLEMS OF QUALIFICATION OF FAVORITE FALSE INDICATIONS, CONCLUSIONS OF AN EXPERT, SPECIALIST OR INCORRECT TRANSFER. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 269-272.
Reference list:
Belkin R.S. Kriminalisticheskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1997. 334 s.
Vayner M.E., Mishin A.V. K voprosu ob ekspertnykh oshibkakh // Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual nye problemy nauki i praktiki. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tol yatti, 2018. S. 300-302
Dubinin L. G. Metodika rassledovaniya zavedomo lozhnykh pokazaniy svidetelya i poterpevshego: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. M., 2010. 24 c.
Egorov N.N. Problemnye voprosy sootnosheniya zaklyucheniya eksperta i zaklyucheniya spetsialista // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 2017. № 1. S. 16-18.
Ivanov N.G. Vozmozhnosti i imperativy osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 1. S. 141-145.
Kosyakova N.S. Lzhesvidetel stvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. № 4. S. 66-74.
Lesnikov G.YU., Kopytkin S.A. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: problemy pravovoy otsenki i pravoprimenitel noy praktiki v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel noy sistemy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 3. S. 281-284.
Popov A.A. Reglamentatsiya v UPK RF pravil, zakreplyayushchikh dopustimost pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse (komparativistskiy podkhod) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 2. S. 155-159.
Radchenko A.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika sub ektov lzhesvidetel stva (st. 307 UK RF) // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2016. № 3 (74). S. 103-109.
Fedorov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya (voprosy istorii, ponyatiya i klassifikatsii) / otv. red. A.I. CHuchaev. Kaluga:, 2004. 284 c.
Vayner M.E., Mishin A.V. K voprosu ob ekspertnykh oshibkakh // Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual nye problemy nauki i praktiki. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tol yatti, 2018. S. 300-302
Dubinin L. G. Metodika rassledovaniya zavedomo lozhnykh pokazaniy svidetelya i poterpevshego: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. M., 2010. 24 c.
Egorov N.N. Problemnye voprosy sootnosheniya zaklyucheniya eksperta i zaklyucheniya spetsialista // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 2017. № 1. S. 16-18.
Ivanov N.G. Vozmozhnosti i imperativy osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 1. S. 141-145.
Kosyakova N.S. Lzhesvidetel stvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. № 4. S. 66-74.
Lesnikov G.YU., Kopytkin S.A. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: problemy pravovoy otsenki i pravoprimenitel noy praktiki v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel noy sistemy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 3. S. 281-284.
Popov A.A. Reglamentatsiya v UPK RF pravil, zakreplyayushchikh dopustimost pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse (komparativistskiy podkhod) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 2. S. 155-159.
Radchenko A.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika sub ektov lzhesvidetel stva (st. 307 UK RF) // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2016. № 3 (74). S. 103-109.
Fedorov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya (voprosy istorii, ponyatiya i klassifikatsii) / otv. red. A.I. CHuchaev. Kaluga:, 2004. 284 c.
Keywords:
expert, specialist, knowingly false testimony, responsibility, inaction.
Related Articles
1. SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS Pages: 14-16 Issue №11007
UNDERSTANDING OF RATIO OF SCIENCE AND SOCIETY E. AGATSCI
activities
knowledge
ideology
cognitive
the context
Show more
13. LAND LAW; NATURAL RESOURCE LAW; ENVIRONMENTAL LAW; AGRARIAN LAW 12.00.06 Pages: 280-284 Issue №19146
SOME THEORETICAL ISSUES OF ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
insurance
risk
environment
environmental
legal relationship
Show more
14. GAPS IN THE LAW, INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW Pages: 198-204 Issue №4395
The issues of international liability for nuclear damage in the framework of bilateral cooperation between the Russian Federation and foreign States in the field of peaceful use of atomic energy
nuclear energy
nuclear damage
responsibility
Show more
3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 212-215 Issue №16988
Once again to the question of the classification of forensics
criminalistics
expertise
methods
system
classification
Show more
11. Administrative law; Administrative process Pages: 238-241 Issue №8046
Rights and responsibilities of citizens in the sphere of protection of public health from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and consequences of tobacco consumption
health
the consequences of tobacco use
responsibility
Show more
10. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 188-190 Issue №9342
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS THE STATUS OF A JUDGE: RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES
the status of the judge
international standards
responsibility
the principle of independence of judges
Show more
17. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 206-210 Issue №11645
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE CONCEPT OF THEIR DOCTRINAL MODEL
activities
authority
the Prosecutor
the act of response
satisfaction
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 235-237 Issue №16680
Features of the use of special psychological knowledge in criminal proceedings
psychologist
psychological knowledge
criminal process
examination
suspect
Show more
10. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 260-264 Issue №17401
Content of individual actions preceding psychophysiological investigation using polygraph
polygraph
psychophysiological research
stages
initiator
occasion
Show more
14. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW 12.00.08 Pages: 303-313 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2021-17-3-303-313 Issue №19146
PUNISHING AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS: CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVES
robot
robotics
artificial intelligence
criminal measures
responsibility
Show more