State property as a political and legal problem in modern Russia
( Pp. 49-57)

This article examines the issue of the current problems of state ownership. At the same time, state property is presented as a political and legal category, which is closely related to state property as an economic category. Much attention is paid not only to state property within the legal and political context, but also to such an aspect as the privatization of state property, which process took place at the end of the twentieth century. The article shows that privatization did not lead to positive results and, on the contrary, exposed many other problems. Such problems include ineffective management of state property, corruption, questions about the relationship between private and state property, legal problems, and so on. In modern Russia, the range of problems of state property as a political and legal category continues to grow, which, of course, requires their scientific understanding. In addition, the particular relevance of the chosen topic is determined by the fact that at the beginning of 2020 the Government of the Russian Federation developed a new program for the privatization of property, which is in federal ownership for three years at once - from 2020 to 2022. In three years, it is planned to alienate more than a thousand state facilities. In order for the program to be implemented properly, it is extremely important to take into account the experience of the past years of privatization of state property.

Albert V.P., Martirosian T.E., (2021), STATE PROPERTY AS A POLITICAL AND LEGAL PROBLEM IN MODERN RUSSIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 49-57.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiyskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020). Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 28399/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020)
Grazhdanskiy Kodeks RF. Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 5142/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020)
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 34661/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020)
Ugolovnyy Kodeks RF. Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 10699/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020)
Akhmatova A.A. Bol shaya privatizatsiya: tseli, zadachi, osobennosti realizatsii v Rossiyskoy ekonomike//Obshchestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie. №6. 2018. S.83-90.
Baklanov I.S., Nikolaenko T.G. Sobstvennost kak filosofsko-pravovaya kategoriya//Aktual nye problemy sovremennosti: nauka i obshchestvo. 2015. №4. S.21-24.
Vinnitskiy A. V. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost v administrativnom prave: monogr. / A.V. Vinnitskiy. M.: Statut, 2019. - 216s.
Vlasti raskryli podrobnosti itogovogo plana privatizatsii// RBK 25.12.2019. Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/25/12/2019/ 5e0371139a79478242e65442 (data obr.: 01.11.2020)
Gorshulyak V.V. Politiko-pravovaya priroda instituta sobstvennosti v Rossii // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. 2011. №4. S.97-101.
Grigor eva O.G. Dinamika form sobstvennosti v otechestvennom prave//Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. №6. 2018. S.52-55.
Grigor eva O.G. K voprosu o ponyatii sobstvennost //Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. №4. 2018. S.88-90.
Efimova A.I. Sovremennye problemy povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost yu v usloviyakh rynka//Aktual nye problemy sotsial no-gumanitarnogo i nauchno-tekhnicheskogo znaniya. 2018. № 1-2 (1). S.93-102.
ZHilinskiy E.S. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovaya osnova razgranicheniya/. M.: Norma, 2016. - 125s.
Mikhaylova E.N. Obzor tipovykh narusheniy v sfere rasporyazheniya gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost yu//Sovetnik v sfere obrazovaniya. № 3. 2019. S.82-53.
Medvedeva E.A. Otvetstvennost za nezakonnuyu privatizatsiyu gosudarstvennoy i munitsipal noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2010. № 3. S.112-118.
Patkina E.YU. Istoricheskie i politiko-pravovye aspekty formirovaniya instituta sobstvennosti v Rossii // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2015. №11. S.48-52.
Prudon P. ZH. CHto takoe sobstvennost Ili issledovanie o printsipe prava i vlasti. M.: Respublika, 1998. - 367s.
Privatizatsiya 2020-2022: privet ot CHubaysa Eksperty o novoy programme privatizatsii. Informatsionno-analiticheskoe izdanie Fonda istoricheskoy perspektivy, yanvar 2020.
Razumovskaya E.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii sushchnosti gosudarstvennoy sobstvennosti// Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. №5. 2017. S.82-89.
Roy N. A., SHpak A.S., Mishina E.S. Sovremennye tendentsii v sisteme upravleniya gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost yu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i puti ikh resheniya // Vestnik Evraziyskoy nauki, 2018 №3, S.58-63.
Solodovnikov S. YU. Sobstvennost kak politiko-ekonomicheskaya kategoriya v KHKHI veke// Ekonomicheskaya nauka segodnya. 2019. №10. S.5-14.
CHernomorets R.V. Voprosy o sobstvennosti v pravovom i ekonomicheskom ponimanii//YUrist - Pravoved . 2010. №5. S.20-25.
https://genproc.gov.ru/ Official website of the Prosecutor General s Office of Russia (date of request: 01.11.2020)
https://sudact.ru Information portal of court decisions (date of request: 01.11.2020)

state property, privatization, ownership, private property, control, power, state, law.