The Modern Criminal Policy of Russia: Experience and Lessons of Continuous Reform
( Pp. 16-22)

More about authors
Maksimov Sergey Vasilievich
Institute for the Study of Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The need to write this article due to the needs of scientific understanding of the preliminary results of twenty years of almost continuous reform of the anti-criminal legislation of Russia, relates to the actual criminal legislation (law on special measures for prevention of crimes). The article gives characteristics of the main weaknesses of the current model of criminal policy. The number of such faults include a critically high level of instability in anticrime legislation and its practical application, the opposite vector character development observation began, the exaggeration of the importance of anticrime legislation as a tool in the fight against crime, making criminal policy functions of regulation of economic relations, there is insufficient scientific (including criminological) the validity of this policy, a high level of dependence on private interests. The study proposals: to establish the State Commission on development of the Concept of criminal policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030; to adopt this Concept and Plan (“Road Map”) for its implementation in the form of the Decree of the President of Russia; to develop in accordance with the Concept and Road Map a new criminological (preventive), criminal, criminal procedure, criminal executive and investigative legislation, legislation on law enforcement. The main expected consequence of the publication is to optimize the basic approaches of the legislator to the practice of formation and implementation of national criminal policy. The article is addressed primarily to the legislator, the law enforcer in the field of criminal justice, researchers, teachers, postgraduates and students of law schools.
How to Cite:
Maksimov S.V., (2017), THE MODERN CRIMINAL POLICY OF RUSSIA: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS OF CONTINUOUS REFORM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 16-22.
Reference list:
Svodnyy otchet o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar -dekabr 2010 g. M.: GIATS MVD Rossii, 2011. S.28.
Burov V.YU., Potaev V.S., Sukhodolov A.P. Maloe predprinimatel stvo v Rossii i Baykal skom regione / V.YU. Burov, V.S. Potaev, A.P. Sukhodolov. Irkutsk, 2011. S.6.
Svodnyy otchet o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar -dekabr 2010 g. M.: GIATS MVD Rossii, 2011. S.4.
Svodnyy otchet o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar -dekabr 2015 g. M.: GIATS MVD Rossii, 2016. S.23.
Ofitsial nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii: http://www.cdep.ru/index. php id 79 item 3418 (№ 10.3.1 Otchet o srokakh lisheniya svobody i razmerakh shtrafov (prilozhenie k otchetu formy № 10.3) ; № 10-a Otchet o chisle osuzhdennykh po vsem sostavam prestupleniy Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ): 2010, 2015. Data obrashcheniya: 14.12.2016.
Monitoring ugolovno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchie problemy. Pod red. S.V.Maksimova. M.: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN - IPSI ARPO RF, 2009. S. 112.
Gumilev L.N. Ot Rusi k Rossii. M., 1992. S.25.
Potseluev E. L. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie 22 marta 1903 g.: prichiny prinyatiya i istoriya sozdaniya // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 3 (248). S. 183-193.