To the question of determining generic and specific object of crime, provided by art. 185.6 of the Criminal Code
( Pp. 216-219)
More about authors
Rastoropova Diana Sergeevna
soiskatel. Dolzhnost: pomoschnik prokurora
University of Prosecutor's Office Russian Federation; Nagatinsky inter-district prosecutors’ office, Moscow city
University of Prosecutor's Office Russian Federation; Nagatinsky inter-district prosecutors’ office, Moscow city
Abstract:
The definition of the essence and correlation of the concepts of “crimes” in the economic sphere” and “crimes in the sphere of economic activity” are traditionally the subject of discussion in the science of criminal law. At the same time, the correctness of the understanding of these categories affects the effectiveness of the application of the norms included in Chapter 22 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, including the crime under Art. 185.6 of the Criminal Code. The author, following the logic of the legislator regarding the construction of Section VIII of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, substantiates his position regarding the generic and specific object of the crime, art. 185.6 of the Criminal Code.
How to Cite:
Rastoropova D.S., (2018), TO THE QUESTION OF DETERMINING GENERIC AND SPECIFIC OBJECT OF CRIME, PROVIDED BY ART. 185.6 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 216-219.
Reference list:
Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti. M.: Uchebno-konsul tatsionnyy tsentr YUrInfoR , 1998. - 296 s.
Dubrovskiy S.P. Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie otnosheniya kak kompleks tekhniko-ekonomicheskikh, organizatsionno-ekonomicheskikh, sotsiokul turnykh i pravovykh otnosheniy // Ekonomika obrazovaniya. 2009. № 4, vyp. 1. S. 25-31.
Ershov M.A. Otvetstvennost za posyagatel stva na konfidentsial nuyu informatsiyu po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu : problemy pravoprimeneniya i sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva : avtoref.. kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2010. - 30 s.
Zvonov A.V. Kriterii ugolovnogo nakazaniya: trebovaniya sovremennosti // CHelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2017. T. 25. № 4. S. 597-602
Kolosov A.S., Pichugin S.A. i dr. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. CHasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya : ucheb. posob. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. Vladimir : VIT-print, 2013. - 608 s.
Kochoi S.M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. M., 2000. - 288 s.
Kubantsev S.P. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika ob ekta prestupleniy v sfere bankrotstva // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7. S. 86-96.
Lozinskiy I.V. K voprosu ob ob ekte prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh glavoy 22 Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Ugolovnaya yustitsiya. 2015. № 1. S. 10-15.
Lopashenko N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti : ponyatie, sistema, problemy kvalifikatsii i nakazaniya : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1997. - 427 s.
Mayorov V.I., YAkupov V.R. Insayderskaya informatsiya: opredelenie ponyatiya // Vestnik UrFO. Bezopasnost v informatsionnoy sfere. 2012. № 3-4. S. 4-10.
Medvedev A.M. Ekonomicheskie prestupleniya: ponyatie i sistema // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1992. № 1. S. 81-83.
Rastoropov S.V., Zvonova A.V. Nekotorye osobennosti sposobov soversheniya prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 228 UK RF v mestakh lisheniya svobody // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 2. S. 101-105
Dubrovskiy S.P. Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie otnosheniya kak kompleks tekhniko-ekonomicheskikh, organizatsionno-ekonomicheskikh, sotsiokul turnykh i pravovykh otnosheniy // Ekonomika obrazovaniya. 2009. № 4, vyp. 1. S. 25-31.
Ershov M.A. Otvetstvennost za posyagatel stva na konfidentsial nuyu informatsiyu po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu : problemy pravoprimeneniya i sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva : avtoref.. kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2010. - 30 s.
Zvonov A.V. Kriterii ugolovnogo nakazaniya: trebovaniya sovremennosti // CHelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2017. T. 25. № 4. S. 597-602
Kolosov A.S., Pichugin S.A. i dr. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. CHasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya : ucheb. posob. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. Vladimir : VIT-print, 2013. - 608 s.
Kochoi S.M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. M., 2000. - 288 s.
Kubantsev S.P. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika ob ekta prestupleniy v sfere bankrotstva // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7. S. 86-96.
Lozinskiy I.V. K voprosu ob ob ekte prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh glavoy 22 Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Ugolovnaya yustitsiya. 2015. № 1. S. 10-15.
Lopashenko N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti : ponyatie, sistema, problemy kvalifikatsii i nakazaniya : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1997. - 427 s.
Mayorov V.I., YAkupov V.R. Insayderskaya informatsiya: opredelenie ponyatiya // Vestnik UrFO. Bezopasnost v informatsionnoy sfere. 2012. № 3-4. S. 4-10.
Medvedev A.M. Ekonomicheskie prestupleniya: ponyatie i sistema // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1992. № 1. S. 81-83.
Rastoropov S.V., Zvonova A.V. Nekotorye osobennosti sposobov soversheniya prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 228 UK RF v mestakh lisheniya svobody // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 2. S. 101-105
