FEATURES OF CRIMINALIZATION OF THE CRIMINAL LAW PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF TORTURE
( Pp. 132-134)

Objective - To analyze in detail the objective signs of torture, to give a detailed description of them. To consider in detail the characterization of the criminalization of the criminal law prohibition of torture. Conclusions - The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation includes a number of rules that criminalize torture and there are signs of torture, but there is no independent criminal law provision, believes that this contributes to an ambiguous approach to determining the nature and degree of public danger of such an act and requires amendments to the Criminal Code. Social consequences - The degree of public danger of torture is clearly difficult to assess. This is due to the fact that during the use of torture a person can be inflicted only beatings, although such methods of influence on the victim that are not physical violence (mental impact) are not excluded. Originality / value - The current legislative approach, as we noted above, does not meet these requirements, but can be brought into proper form. The provability of torture, as a rule, does not cause significant difficulties, as evidenced by the examples of criminalizing torture.

Zhurtov A.B., (2019), FEATURES OF CRIMINALIZATION OF THE CRIMINAL LAW PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF TORTURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 132-134.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 N 11-FKZ).
Konventsiya protiv pytok i drugikh zhestokikh, beschelovechnykh ili unizhayushchikh dostoinstvo vidov obrashcheniya i nakazaniya 1984 g., URL: http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/decl conv/conventions/torture.shtml (Data obrashcheniya 20 iyulya 2018 g.).
ZHenevskaya konventsiya o zashchite grazhdanskogo naseleniya vo vremya voyny (prinyata v g. ZHeneve, 12 avgusta 1949 g.) / Deystvuyushchee mezhdunarodnoe pravo. T. 2. - M.: Moskovskiy nezavisimyy institut mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1997. - S. 681-731.
ZHenevskaya konventsiya ob uluchshenii uchasti ranenykh i bol nykh v deystvuyushchikh armiyakh (vmeste s Proektom soglasheniya o sanitarnykh zonakh i mestnostyakh ) (zaklyuchena v g. ZHeneve 12.08.1949 g.) / Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav i svobod cheloveka. Sbornik dokumentov. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1990. - S. 412-436.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2018).
Ob oruzhii: Federal nyy zakon ot 13 noyabrya 1996 g. № 150-FZ URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons doc LAW 12679.(data obrashcheniya 12 maya 2019g.)
Ordokov, M.KH. Sushchnost i znachenie protsessual nykh resheniy po ugolovnomu delu / M.KH. Ordokov: Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki, 2017. - T. 7. № 3. S. 241-243.
Internet: http://www.ivlim.ru/ FOXzhurnal. Arkhiv Zlatoustovskogo gorodskogo suda CHelyabinskoy oblasti. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-992.1999.
Gladkikh, G.YU. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za pytki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / G.YU. Gladkikh: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - Rostov-na-Donu, 2004. - S. 25-62.
Zvecharovskiy, I.E. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: ponyatie, printsipy, politika / I.E. Zvecharovskiy. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2001.
Krasheninnikov, A.A. Ugroza v ugolovnom prave Rossii (problemy teorii i praktiki pravovogo regulirovaniya) / A.A. Krasheninnikov / Otv. red. A.I. CHuchaev. - Ul yanovsk: UlGU, 2002.
Kardanov, R.R. Pokhishchenie cheloveka i zakhvat zalozhnika - sootnoshenie sostavov, osobennosti kvalifikatsii /Kardanov R.R.// Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2016. № 2 (14). S. 98-101.
Mashekuasheva M.KH. Problemy i perspektivy protivodeystviya prestupleniyam ekstremistskoy i terroristicheskoy napravlennosti. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 3. S. 64-66.

torture, human rights, law, humanity, criminal law, responsibility, crime, coercion.