Legal knowledge as a means of legal self-help: concept, content, meaning
( Pp. 347-353)

More about authors
Uzdimaeva Natalya I. kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava
National Research Mordovia State University
Abstract:
Legal statehood and a developed civil society presuppose not only the formulation of relevant ideas at the doctrinal and normative levels, but also their implementation in everyday life. Ideas are realized only if necessary and effective systems are created in the minds of citizens and their associations that allow everyone to fully ensure and protect their legal rights, interests and responsibilities. If they are available, the citizen not only possesses information about the above-mentioned legal status, but also fully implements the element, there are own legal goals. The article is devoted to the analysis of legal knowledge as a means of legal self-protection. The purpose of the research is to characterize legal knowledge as a part of information, determine its structure, use theoretical and practical legal knowledge in the context of the problems of assessing and increasing the level of legal literacy of Russians. Results. As a result of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that legal knowledge is an element of the mechanism of social and legal interaction. They are the foundation of legal self-help, an important and primary tool. The author draws attention to the fact that high-quality legal knowledge is formed, first of all, in the course of legal training. They can be of a purely theoretical or applied nature, they are divided into general (basic) and special (industry-specific). The main place in the system of legal knowledge is given to the knowledge of constitutional norms and the test of the Constitution itself. The emphasis is made on the need to adjust the forms of legal education to increase the level of legal literacy of Russians, their human rights activity, which is especially important in the context of digitalization of law.
How to Cite:
Uzdimaeva N.I., (2020), LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AS A MEANS OF LEGAL SELF-HELP: CONCEPT, CONTENT, MEANING. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 347-353.
Reference list:
Alekseeva M.V., Rybak S.V. Voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya otdel nykh napravleniy informatsionnogo prostranstva znaniy // Filosofiya prava. 2019. № 2. S. 85-91.
VTSIOM: tol ko 6 rossiyan khorosho znayut Konstitutsiyu Elektronnyy resurs // Pravo.ru. 2018. 5 dek. URL: https://pravo.ru/news/207345/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Golovin E.G., Bol shakova V.M., Naumova L.YU. Obespechenie prav i svobod grazhdan i riski tsifrovizatsii // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2020. № 2-1. S. 3-10.
Znanie zakonov. Nuzhno li obychnomu cheloveku znat zakony Mozhet li on sam v nikh razobrat sya : rezul taty oprosov Fonda obshchestvennogo mneniya ot 9 marta 2008 g. i ot 5 okt. 2014 g. Elektronnyy resurs // Ofitsial nyy sayt Fonda obshchestvennogo mneniya. URL: https://fom.ru/Bezopasnost-i-pravo/11844 (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Izuchenie informirovannosti i vospriyatiya naseleniem RF Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: analiticheskiy obzor VTSIOM Elektronnyy resurs // Ofitsial nyy sayt VTSIOM. 2018. 5 dek. URL: https://wciom.ru/database/open projects/konstitucija rf/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Imaeva G.R., Makarova N.S., Nikishova E.N. Pravovaya gramotnost rossiyan: na puti k grazhdanskomu obshchestvu. M., 2018. 82 s. Elektronnyy resurs // URL: https://amulex.ru/storage/partners doc/UA0nJJ6VjTgIGrfgbMyuArOupkiVMyqEsnjyZPZU.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Kozlova N., Mizulin M., Sashchenko N., SHabrov O. Dlya kogo zakon ne pisan // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2006. 4 apr.
Konstitutsiya Rossii: prava i svobody: analiticheskiy obzor VTSIOM Elektronnyy resurs // Ofitsial nyy sayt VTSIOM. 2016. 12 dek. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php id 236 uid 115994 (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Panchenko V.YU. Pravovoe obrazovanie i yuridicheskaya samopomoshch // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti / pod red. M.M. ZHuravleva, A.M. Barnashova, S.S. Kuznetsova. CH. 53. Tomsk, 2012. S. 54-55.
Panchenko V.YU., SHevchenkov I.A. O pravovom obuchenii kak forme yuridicheskoy pomoshchi // Pravo i obrazovanie. 2013. № 1. S. 53-58.
Pravovaya gramotnost . Obyazatel no li znat zakony Kakuyu pol zu prinosit znanie zakonov, i kakoy vred neznanie : rezul taty oprosa ot 30 sent. 2018 g. Elektronnyy resurs // Ofitsial nyy sayt Fonda obshchestvennogo mneniya. URL: https://fom.ru/Bezopasnost-i-pravo/14115 (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Rossiyane ne sklonny zashchishchat svoi bytovye prava: rezul taty vserossiyskogo issledovaniya pravovoy gramotnosti: Natsional naya YUridicheskaya Sluzhba Amuleks i Analiticheskiy tsentr NAFI, may 2017 g. Elektronnyy resurs // URL: http://blog.amulex. ru/pravogramma (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2020).
Syrykh V.M. Materialisticheskaya filosofiya chastnogo prava. M., 2014. 549 s.
KHachaturova S.S. Neobkhodimost ispol zovaniya v uchebnom protsesse komp yuternykh spravochno-pravovykh sistem // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental nykh issledovaniy. 2015. № 12. S. 318-320.
Keywords:
legal knowledge, legal self-help, self-help means, knowledge of law, legal literacy, legal education.