CONCEPT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM OF SECURITY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 150-154)

Objective: A sufficient number of laws and regulations have now been adopted in this area, but their actual application raises some problems in terms of developing effective application algorithms, both individual security measures and their integrated use. The system of safety measures has cross-sectoral content, that is, the process of implementation of separate protective measures requires the use of different industry norms, which should not contradict each other. The classification of State protection and criminal procedure security measures includes a grouping of existing protective measures and allows for a diverse view of the systemic and meaningful relationship. Methodology: The process of studying the current system of security measures of participants in criminal proceedings includes a method of comparing and comparing (relatively legal) different-sector legal means aimed at a single result - protection of participants in criminal proceedings and safety of procedural procedures. Conclusions: The following conclusions emerged from the study: 1. The system of security measures is enshrined in legal instruments. These documents contain different types of protective measures, which are aimed at implementing the same process - ensuring a safe environment for persons who facilitate criminal proceedings. 2. The legal measures available to protect (safety) citizens in connection with their participation in criminal proceedings and the intention to promote evidence are currently significant in number. They are diverse in their incorporation into legal acts of varying legal significance. Therefore, they can be classified on various grounds. 3. The concept of "safety measures system" has been studied and the author 's definition has been presented. The content of the system of security measures should include a focus on the elimination of existing and possible future contradictions, which are of a different nature. Possibility of subsequent use: the analytical conclusions proposed in the work are aimed at strengthening criminal procedure guarantees of the individual, Expanding the scope of existing and emerging scientific research in the field of regulation of the security of participants in criminal proceedings, Optimization of procedural and related mechanisms for the implementation of individual security measures, To improve judicial and investigative practice, as well as in the course of the educational process, in the training of students in legal areas. The practical significance of the results obtained is expressed in the possibility of using them both in pre-trial and judicial proceedings in criminal cases. The social significance of the results is reflected in the improvement not only of the effectiveness of the process of proof in a criminal case, but also of the legal protection of the legitimate interests of citizens in the course of criminal proceedings. Value of the results obtained: Based on the study, new knowledge has been gained about the system of security measures of participants in criminal proceedings, as a multilevel and intersectoral group. These conclusions can be useful for the legislator and the formation of judicial practice, in order to improve the safety of persons involved in the field of criminal proceedings. The work is intended for persons studying scientific and law enforcement problems of personal security, postgraduate students and students of law universities.

Lanshakov D.S., (2019), CONCEPT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM OF SECURITY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 150-154.

Bakunovskiy P.V. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v sfere obespecheniya bezopasnosti poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh lits, sodeystvuyushchikh rassledovaniyu // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2009. N 16. S. 26 - 28.
Brusnitsyn L.V. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy i mirovoy opyt obespecheniya bezopasnosti lits, sodeystvuyushchikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: Dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2002. 520 s.
Vorobey D.A. Problemy protsessual noy bezopasnosti svidetelya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2011. N 14. S. 14 - 16.
Dmitrieva A.A. Mery bezopasnosti, primenyaemye v otnoshenii uchastnikov protsessa na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya ugolovnogo dela // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017. N 1. S. 3 - 6.
Epikhin A.YU. K voprosu o nadzore (kontrole) za obespecheniem bezopasnosti lichnosti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2004. № 3. S. 359.
Epikhin A.YU. Kontseptsiya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Syktyvkar, 2000.
Epikhin A.YU. Nekotorye problemy zashchity postradavshego // V sbornike: Kriminal naya situatsiya na rubezhe vekov v Rossii. Sbornik statey. Pod redaktsiey: A. I. Dolgovoy. Moskva, 1999. S. 207-210.
Epikhin A.YU. Pravovye problemy kontrol no-revizionnoy deyatel nosti bezopasnosti lichnosti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i puti ikh razresheniya // V sbornike: Politicheskie, ekonomicheskie i sotsiokul turnye aspekty regional nogo upravleniya na Evropeyskom Severe. 2013. S. 70-76.
Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Mezhotraslevaya sistema mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // V sbornike: Sotsial no-pravovaya zashchita detstva kak prioritetnoe napravlenie sovremennoy gosudarstvennoy politiki. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2018. S. 202-211.
Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Mezhotraslevaya sistema mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // V sbornike: Sotsial no-pravovaya zashchishchennost detstva kak prioritetnoe napravlenie sovremennoy gosudarstvennoy politiki. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2018. S. 202-211.
Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sodeystvuyushchikh ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu: uchebnoe posobie. - Kazan : Kazan. federal nyy un-t, 2018. - S. 52-54.
Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Sokhranenie v tayne dannykh o lichnosti zashchishchaemogo litsa v ugolovnom dele: protsessual nyy i takticheskiy aspekty // V sbornike: taktiko-metodicheskie osobennosti rassledovaniya ekonomicheskikh i inykh prestupleniy. Kazan , 2018. S. 23-30.
Zaytsev O.A. Kontseptsiya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. № 3 (53). S. 77-81.
Zaytsev O.A., Pastukhov P.S. Ob aktivnoy roli suda v ugolovno-protsessual nom dokazyvanii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 6. S. 84-88.
Petukhovskiy A.A. Ugolovno-protsessual nye aspekty obespecheniya bezopasnosti svideteley, poterpevshikh i drugikh grazhdan, sodeystvuyushchikh ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu // Aktual nye problemy rassledovaniya prestupleniy. Trudy Akademii MVD Rossii / Akademiya MVD Rossii. M., 1995. S. 94 - 105.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 11.11.2006 N 664 (red. ot 18.09.2017) quot;Ob utverzhdenii Pravil vyplaty edinovremennykh posobiy poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, v otnoshenii kotorykh v ustanovlennom poryadke prinyato reshenie ob osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennoy zashchity quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 20.11.2006. N 47. St. 4895 i dr.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 25.10.2018 N 1272 quot;Ob utverzhdenii Gosudarstvennoy programmy quot;Obespechenie bezopasnosti poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na 2019 - 2023 gody quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 29.10.2018. N 44. St. 6764.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20.08.2004 N 119-FZ (red. ot 07.02.2017) quot;O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23.08.2004. N 34. St. 3534.
KHolevchuk A.G. Ispol zovanie sredstv kriptograficheskoy zashchity informatsii v tselyakh obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2016. N 22. S. 31 - 34.
SHCHerba S., Zaytsev O., Sarsenbaev T. Poterpevshiy v bespomoshchnom sostoyanii: osobennosti sudebnogo razbiratel stva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 9. S. 20.

safety, protection, participants, criminal case, criminal justice, legal proceedings, classification, system.