Topical issues of the definition of hooligancy from related compositions of crimes
( Pp. 119-122)
More about authors
Zaurbi L. Shkhagapsoev
Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Rector
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V. M. Kokov
Nalchik, Russian Federation Akkaeva Halimat Alievna Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate professor, Police Colonel, head of the department of special technical disciplines
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V. M. Kokov
Nalchik, Russian Federation Akkaeva Halimat Alievna Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate professor, Police Colonel, head of the department of special technical disciplines
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
Abstract:
Ensuring public order is of particular importance in a democratic state. The spread of crime, including among minors, significantly impedes the development of society and the state. In this context, the fight against hooliganism, which is actively developing among modern youth, is of particular interest. Despite the fact that responsibility for hooliganism has been stipulated by Russian criminal law for a long time, a number of controversial issues still remain in law enforcement practice. The object of hooliganism is a very wide range of public relations, in connection with which investigative and judicial authorities quite often encounter situations when the qualification of hooligan actions is difficult, and unlawful behavior simultaneously falls under the characteristics of several related offenses. The purpose of writing a research paper is to analyze Russian criminal legislation, investigative and judicial practice in order to identify criteria for distinguishing hooliganism from related offenses. The authors come to the conclusion that there are many controversial points in the qualification of hooliganism, which significantly complicate the delimitation of this illegal act from certain crimes against the person, property and public safety. Attention is focused on the complexity of qualifications in bringing to justice for hooliganism in the case of the presence of qualifying signs.
How to Cite:
Zaurbi L.S., Akkaeva H.A., (2021), TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF HOOLIGANCY FROM RELATED COMPOSITIONS OF CRIMES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 119-122.
Reference list:
Batyukova V.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za khuliganstvo i inye prestupleniya, sovershaemye iz khuliganskikh pobuzhdeniy: monografiya. M.: YUNITI-DANA, 2017. 199 s.
Borovikov V.B., Borovikova V.V. Voprosy razgranicheniya massovykh besporyadkov s administrativnymi pravonarusheniyami // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 5. S. 98-101.
Golubeva E.R., Karimova G.YU. Otgranichenie khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy i administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. № 7 (146). S. 150-151.
Grishin D.A., Balashova YU.V. Zarubezhnoe zakonodatel stvo v sfere regulirovaniya otvetstvennosti za khuliganstvo // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2019. № 3. S. 138-142.
Ivanova T.E. Sootnoshenie publichnykh deystviy, oskorblyayushchikh religioznye chuvstva veruyushchikh, s prestupleniyami ekstremistskoy napravlennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 4. S. 198-202.
Kudashkin S.K. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti za gruppovoe khuliganstvo // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2019. № 6 (43). S. 72-78.
Pachuliya N.A. Kvalifikatsiya ugolovno nakazuemogo khuliganstva s uchetom ob ektivnykh priznakov // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 4 (50). S. 54-59.
Prokof ev K.G. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya, posyagayushchie na obshchestvennyy poryadok i obshchestvennuyu bezopasnost // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 5. S. 148-151.
Romanova A.S. Otgranichenie khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2020. № 2 (89). S. 67-70.
KHubiev A.T. Spetsifika otgranicheniya khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy i administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Nauchnyy aspekt. 2020. T. 7. № 2. S. 895-899.
Borovikov V.B., Borovikova V.V. Voprosy razgranicheniya massovykh besporyadkov s administrativnymi pravonarusheniyami // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 5. S. 98-101.
Golubeva E.R., Karimova G.YU. Otgranichenie khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy i administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. № 7 (146). S. 150-151.
Grishin D.A., Balashova YU.V. Zarubezhnoe zakonodatel stvo v sfere regulirovaniya otvetstvennosti za khuliganstvo // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2019. № 3. S. 138-142.
Ivanova T.E. Sootnoshenie publichnykh deystviy, oskorblyayushchikh religioznye chuvstva veruyushchikh, s prestupleniyami ekstremistskoy napravlennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 4. S. 198-202.
Kudashkin S.K. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti za gruppovoe khuliganstvo // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2019. № 6 (43). S. 72-78.
Pachuliya N.A. Kvalifikatsiya ugolovno nakazuemogo khuliganstva s uchetom ob ektivnykh priznakov // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 4 (50). S. 54-59.
Prokof ev K.G. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya, posyagayushchie na obshchestvennyy poryadok i obshchestvennuyu bezopasnost // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 5. S. 148-151.
Romanova A.S. Otgranichenie khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2020. № 2 (89). S. 67-70.
KHubiev A.T. Spetsifika otgranicheniya khuliganstva ot smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy i administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Nauchnyy aspekt. 2020. T. 7. № 2. S. 895-899.
Keywords:
hooliganism, crime against public order, qualification of hooliganism, delimitation of hooliganism from related crimes, Russian criminal legislation.
