GENERAL THEORETICAL, CONCEPTUAL AND LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPTS OF CIVIL LIABILITY AND LEGAL SANCTIONS
( Pp. 203-208)
More about authors
Ibragimova A.I.
kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra arbitrazhnogo, grazhdanskogo i administrativnogo processa.
Russian State University of Justice. Branch: North-Caucasian Institute
Russian State University of Justice. Branch: North-Caucasian Institute
Abstract:
This article is a continuation of the author’s research on the problems of a general theoretical, conceptual and legislative definition of the concepts of civil liability and legal sanctions in modern civil law in Russia. Based on the analysis of the diverse positions and views of famous Russian scholars and legal scholars, the author formulated an author’s model of conceptual and legislative definition of civil liability and legal sanctions.
How to Cite:
Ibragimova A.., (2019), GENERAL THEORETICAL, CONCEPTUAL AND LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPTS OF CIVIL LIABILITY AND LEGAL SANCTIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 203-208.
Reference list:
Agarkov M.M. Problema obyazatel stv iz prichineniya vreda. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. V dvukh tomakh. M., 2002.
Belov V.A. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo. M., YUrayt, 2018.
Bogdanov E.V. Razvitie grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: tendentsii, perspektivy, problemy. M.: YUniti-Dana. Zakon i pravo. 2014. S. 76.
Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga 1. Obshchie polozheniya. M., Statut, 2009. S. 123.
Belyakova A.M. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda. Teoriya i praktika. MGU, 1986.
Bogdanov E.V. Razvitie grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: tendentsii, perspektivy, problemy. M.: YUniti-Dana. Zakon i pravo. 2014. S. 76.
Gribanov V.P. Otvetstvennost za narushenie grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey. M., 2000.
Ibragimova A.I. Institut spravedlivogo vozmeshcheniya vreda i ubytkov v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Istoriya stanovleniya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Makhachkala, 2018. S. 249.
Ivanova O.M. Osnovaniya, tseli i zadachi yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. Samara, 2009. S. 66.
Idrisov KH.V. Vina kak uslovie otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoreferat dissert. kandidat. yuridich. nauk. M., 2010. S. 18-21.
Ioffe O.S., SHargorodskiy M.D. Voprosy teorii prava. M., 2001. S. 81.
Maleina M.N. Lichnye imushchestvennye prava grazhdan: ponyatie, osushchestvlenie, zashchita. M., 2001. S. 36.
Osipyan B.A. Pravosoznanie cheloveka, pravootnosheniya i obshchestvennyy pravoporyadok //Nauchnaya mysl . 2016. № 2. S. 108-124.
SHepel T.V. Osobennosti grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti prichinitelya vreda s psikhicheskim rasstroystvom. Kemerovo, 2005. S. 182.
Belov V.A. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo. M., YUrayt, 2018.
Bogdanov E.V. Razvitie grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: tendentsii, perspektivy, problemy. M.: YUniti-Dana. Zakon i pravo. 2014. S. 76.
Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga 1. Obshchie polozheniya. M., Statut, 2009. S. 123.
Belyakova A.M. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda. Teoriya i praktika. MGU, 1986.
Bogdanov E.V. Razvitie grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: tendentsii, perspektivy, problemy. M.: YUniti-Dana. Zakon i pravo. 2014. S. 76.
Gribanov V.P. Otvetstvennost za narushenie grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey. M., 2000.
Ibragimova A.I. Institut spravedlivogo vozmeshcheniya vreda i ubytkov v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Istoriya stanovleniya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Makhachkala, 2018. S. 249.
Ivanova O.M. Osnovaniya, tseli i zadachi yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. Samara, 2009. S. 66.
Idrisov KH.V. Vina kak uslovie otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoreferat dissert. kandidat. yuridich. nauk. M., 2010. S. 18-21.
Ioffe O.S., SHargorodskiy M.D. Voprosy teorii prava. M., 2001. S. 81.
Maleina M.N. Lichnye imushchestvennye prava grazhdan: ponyatie, osushchestvlenie, zashchita. M., 2001. S. 36.
Osipyan B.A. Pravosoznanie cheloveka, pravootnosheniya i obshchestvennyy pravoporyadok //Nauchnaya mysl . 2016. № 2. S. 108-124.
SHepel T.V. Osobennosti grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti prichinitelya vreda s psikhicheskim rasstroystvom. Kemerovo, 2005. S. 182.
Keywords:
damage, harm and loss, civil liability, legal sanctions, restoration of violated rights, fair compensation for harm and loss, collection, state coercion, execution of punishment.
