CRIMINAL OFFENSE AS A CATEGORY OF ACTS PROHIBITED IN THE CRIMINAL CODE
( Pp. 113-115)

Purpose. The material aims to describe the legal nature of the criminal offense, as well as to determine the place of this in the system of criminally prohibited acts. The order of differentiation of public responsibility on administratively-punishable offenses and criminally-punishable offenses is deprived of scientific methodology. Therefore, the institution of criminal misconduct is able to change the situation, that is: to create a new basis for placing "borderline" offenses into the correct code. Summary. The research resulted in the author's version of the scientific approach to modeling the Institute of criminal misconduct in the national criminal law. Practical importance. The criteria of criminal offenses obtained in the study and the signs of difference between offenses and crimes can be used in the formation of the test of the law on criminal misconduct. The proposed explanation of the legal nature of criminal misconduct will help to qualitatively differentiate criminal liability. The value of the work lies in the need of science and society to solve the problem of differentiation of public responsibility.

Golikova A.V., (2019), CRIMINAL OFFENSE AS A CATEGORY OF ACTS PROHIBITED IN THE CRIMINAL CODE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 113-115.

Gavrilov B. YA., Rogova E. V. Perspektiva zakrepleniya ugolovnogo prostupka v kontekste reformirovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva Rossii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya - 2016. - № 11. S. 2-5.
Dal V. I. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo Velikorusskogo yazyka. Elektronnyy resurs URL http://slovardalya.ru/description/prostupat/34702 (data obrashcheniya 18/08/2019)
Esakov G.A. Ot administrativnykh pravonarusheniy k ugolovnym prostupkam, ili o sushchestvovanii ugolovnogo prava v shirokom smysle // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 1(6). S. 37-45.
Interv yu Predsedatelya Verkhovnogo Suda RF V.M. Lebedeva CHinovnik pered vysshim sudom. Vyacheslav Lebedev: my podderzhim grazhdanina v spore s byurokratom // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2008. - № 4803.
Kirin A.V. Ugolovnoe i administrativno-deliktnoe pravo: partnerstvo, a ne paternalizm // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. №02. S. 126-135.
Korobov P.V. Prestuplenie i ugolovnyy prostupok // Sootnoshenie prestupleniy i inykh pravonarusheniy. Sovremennye problemy: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauch.- praktich. konf., posvyashchennoy 250-letiyu obrazovaniya Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta im. M.V. Lomonosova i sostoyavsheysya na yurid. fakul tete MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova 27-28 maya 2004 g. M., 2005. C. 90-95.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniy dlya ikh kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2010. № 6 S. 67-75.
Kuznetsova N.F. O sovershenstvovanii ugolovnogo zakona // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. - 2009. - № 5. - S. 12-16.
Malinovskiy A.A. Kriticheskie razmyshleniya o kontseptsii ugolovnogo prava v shirokom smysle // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. №02. S. 173-178.
Nomokonov V.A. Kriminalizatsiya administrativnogo prava ili administrativnyy proizvol kriminalizatsii // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. №02. S. 208-213.
Ozhegov S. I. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. Elektronnyy resurs URL https://slovarozhegova.ru/ word.php wordid 24916 (data obrashcheniya 18/08/2019)
Romanova L.I., SHishkina O.E. Problemy razvitiya ugolovno-pravovoy i administrativno-deliktnoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. №02 S. 234-244.
TSepelev V.F. Sootnoshenie prestupleniya i inykh pravonarusheniy: sravnitel nyy aspekt // Sootnoshenie prestupleniy i inykh pravonarusheniy: sovremennye problemy: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauch.-praktich. konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 250-letiyu obrazovaniya Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta im. M.V. Lomonosova. M., 2005. S. 631-633.

criminal offense, differentiation of public responsibility, crime, criminal responsibility, legal consequences of criminal offense.