Problems of applying the prohibition of certain actions as a new measure of restraint in Russian criminal proceedings
( Pp. 227-229)
More about authors
Kankulov Anzor Khusenovich
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Internal Affairs Activities in Special Conditions of the
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
The author of the article systematized the opinions available in the scientific literature regarding the prohibition of certain actions introduced into the Russian criminal procedure by Federal law No. 72-FZ of April 18, 2018 and concluded that the appearance of a new measure of restraint is difficult to assess unambiguously. Among the main problems the author saw the lack of clear distinction between the prohibition of certain actions and house arrest; in article 105.1 of the RF criminal code says nothing about the possibility of communication with counsel; the lack of resource base, which would allow the FSIN to exercise effective control. At the end of the article, the author formulated proposals aimed at minimizing the identified problems.
How to Cite:
Kankulov A.K., (2020), PROBLEMS OF APPLYING THE PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS AS A NEW MEASURE OF RESTRAINT IN RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 227-229.
Reference list:
Federal nyy zakon ot 18 aprelya 2018 g. № 72-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti izbraniya i primeneniya mer presecheniya v vide zapreta opredelennykh deystviy, zaloga i domashnego aresta // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2018. № 17. St. 2421.
Apostolova N.N. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy v sisteme mer presecheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2019. № 3. S. 23-25
Belkin A.R. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy - khorosho li on opredelen // Sudebnaya vlast i ugolovnyy protsess. 2019. № 2. S. 44.
Zagvozdkin N.N. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy. Analiz pravoprimenitel noy praktiki, 2018 /N.N. Zagvozdkin, S.A. Kuzora Elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zapret-opredelennyh-deystviy-analiz-pravoprimenitelnoypraktiki (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2020).
Kvyk A.V. K voprosu o nesovershenstve sistemy sredstv kontrolya za nakhozhdeniem podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) pod domashnim arestom // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017. № 4. S. 24-26.
Ratanov A.A. K voprosu usovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva mery presecheniya v vide zapreta opredelennykh deystviy // Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2019. №2 (23). S. 36.
Sadenova A.B. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy kak mera presecheniya opredelennykh deystviy kak mera presecheniya: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty // Nauchnyy zhurnal YUridicheskiy fakt . 2020. № 1. S. 39.
YAnin M.G. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy kak al ternativa zaklyucheniyu pod strazhu // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. 2019. №3 (22). S. 65.
Apostolova N.N. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy v sisteme mer presecheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2019. № 3. S. 23-25
Belkin A.R. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy - khorosho li on opredelen // Sudebnaya vlast i ugolovnyy protsess. 2019. № 2. S. 44.
Zagvozdkin N.N. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy. Analiz pravoprimenitel noy praktiki, 2018 /N.N. Zagvozdkin, S.A. Kuzora Elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zapret-opredelennyh-deystviy-analiz-pravoprimenitelnoypraktiki (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2020).
Kvyk A.V. K voprosu o nesovershenstve sistemy sredstv kontrolya za nakhozhdeniem podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) pod domashnim arestom // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017. № 4. S. 24-26.
Ratanov A.A. K voprosu usovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva mery presecheniya v vide zapreta opredelennykh deystviy // Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2019. №2 (23). S. 36.
Sadenova A.B. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy kak mera presecheniya opredelennykh deystviy kak mera presecheniya: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty // Nauchnyy zhurnal YUridicheskiy fakt . 2020. № 1. S. 39.
YAnin M.G. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy kak al ternativa zaklyucheniyu pod strazhu // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. 2019. №3 (22). S. 65.
Keywords:
prohibition of certain actions, control, preventive measure, problems.
