Criminal procedure procedures for the state protection of persons who represent the prosecution on the fact of the committed crime
( Pp. 244-246)

Ensuring state protection of individuals and officials involved in the prosecution's procedural activities is the basis for implementing legal and organizational procedures for preventing and preventing threats against individuals and their property. The process of implementing the measures provided for by the legislation is entrusted to a certain number of officials and special state protection bodies. The article deals with the problems associated with the process of ensuring state protection of persons acting in criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution. The object of the research is a set of social relations that develop in the process of implementing criminal procedure methods for protecting all participants in pre-trial proceedings and judicial proceedings on the part of the prosecution, in order to ensure their personal and property security. The main goal and the actual area of study is, the order of the functions of criminal procedure evidence, and the adoption of certain decisions to improve the mechanism of state protection of all participants in the procedural action by the charges in the adjustment of legal regulation of factual and legal basis of the implementation procedures of state protection of parties to the proceedings, as well as making certain proposals to improve the law enforcement practice officials.

Magomedov G.B., Murtuzov I.N., (2020), CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROCEDURES FOR THE STATE PROTECTION OF PERSONS WHO REPRESENT THE PROSECUTION ON THE FACT OF THE COMMITTED CRIME. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 244-246.

Gladkikh A.A. Problemy primeneniya mer po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva//Aktual nye problemy reformirovaniya sovremennogo zakonodatel stva - Ufa: Aeterna, 2018. - S. 62-69.
Gamidov A.M. Problemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti i sotsial noy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa// YUridicheskiy vestnik DGU - Makhachkala.- 2015.- № 2.- S. 132-136.
Kuvaldina YU.V. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred yavlennym obvineniem: problemy primeneniya po krugu del//YUridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta - Samara.- №4. 2011.- 113-121.
Lubin A.F. Gosudarstvennaya zashchita uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa so storony obvineniya: Monografiya / Lubin A.F., Sokolov D.S., Afanas ev A.YU. Moskva: YUrlitinform, 2020.- 224 s.
Ovsyannikov I.V. Nesoglasie gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya s primeneniem osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel stva// Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii - Saratov.- 2020. - № 1 (132).- S. 163-168.
KHorosheva A.E. Taktiko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie issledovanie v sude s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley veshchestvennykh dokazatel stv so sledami krovi// Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - Barnaul.- 2018.- S. 179-186.

process, implementation, improvement, investigator, inquirer, witness.