Institute of inadmissible evidence in criminal proceedings
( Pp. 239-241)
More about authors
Surtsev Alexander Vladimirovich
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
The author of the article, having considered inadmissible evidence in criminal proceedings, concluded that there is no unity among the authors regarding their understanding. Systematization of different points of view allowed the author to state that if evidence, which meets the requirements of the code of criminal procedure, are valid (enough), it is inadmissible evidence in a criminal trial should admit that evidence, which do not meet legislative requirements, i.e. obtained in violation of the code of criminal procedure. It is proposed to fix a specific list of criteria at the level of the law that allow recognizing evidence as inadmissible when forming, checking and evaluating it.
How to Cite:
Surtsev A.V., (2020), INSTITUTE OF INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 239-241.
Reference list:
Erpylev, I.V. Priznanie dokazatel stva nedopustimym kak vid ugolovno-protsessual noy otvetstvennosti. Gosudarstvo i regiony. - 2011. - № 1(1). S. 40-43.
Kipnis, N.M. Dopustimost dokazatel stv po novomu UPK // Vozmozhnosti zashchity v ramkakh novogo UPK Rossii: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii advokatov / pod red. G.M. Reznika, E.YU. L vovoy. M., 2004. - S. 13.
Lupinskaya, P.A. Dokazatel stvennoe pravo v UPK RF: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy prinyatiyu novogo ugolovno protsessual nogo kodeksa RF. M., 2002. 580 s.
Novikov, S.A. YA vinoven : Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie sobstvennogo priznaniya viny v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Pravovedenie. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 152.
Petukhov, N.E. Otdel nye aspekty problemy dopustimosti dokazatel stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pyat desyat let kafedre ugolovnogo protsessa UrGYUA (SYUI): materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Ekaterinburg, 27-28 yanvarya 2005 g.: v 2 ch. Ekaterinburg, 2005.- CH. 2. - S. 182-183
Smirnov, A.V. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii /A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy / pod red. A.V. Smirnova. SPb., 2003. 1072 s.
YAnovskiy, R.S. Teoriya i praktika priznaniya dokazatel stv nedopustimymi v ugolovnom protsesse // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2019. - Tom 9. - № 3A. - S. 261-268.
Kipnis, N.M. Dopustimost dokazatel stv po novomu UPK // Vozmozhnosti zashchity v ramkakh novogo UPK Rossii: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii advokatov / pod red. G.M. Reznika, E.YU. L vovoy. M., 2004. - S. 13.
Lupinskaya, P.A. Dokazatel stvennoe pravo v UPK RF: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy prinyatiyu novogo ugolovno protsessual nogo kodeksa RF. M., 2002. 580 s.
Novikov, S.A. YA vinoven : Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie sobstvennogo priznaniya viny v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Pravovedenie. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 152.
Petukhov, N.E. Otdel nye aspekty problemy dopustimosti dokazatel stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pyat desyat let kafedre ugolovnogo protsessa UrGYUA (SYUI): materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Ekaterinburg, 27-28 yanvarya 2005 g.: v 2 ch. Ekaterinburg, 2005.- CH. 2. - S. 182-183
Smirnov, A.V. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii /A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy / pod red. A.V. Smirnova. SPb., 2003. 1072 s.
YAnovskiy, R.S. Teoriya i praktika priznaniya dokazatel stv nedopustimymi v ugolovnom protsesse // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2019. - Tom 9. - № 3A. - S. 261-268.
Keywords:
admissibility, legality, inadmissible evidence, criminal process.
