PROPERTY RIGHTS AS AN OBJECT OF CIVIL RIGHTS
( Pp. 61-63)
More about authors
Netishinskaya Lyubov Fedorovna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava.
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin Blagodarova Nadezhda Sergeevna studentka
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin Blagodarova Nadezhda Sergeevna studentka
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Abstract:
The article discusses issues related to the existence in the legislation of such an object of civil rights as property rights, which is included in the category of “other property”. Given the fuzzy and insufficient, in our opinion, legislative regulation of the content and nature of property rights, we consider it necessary to analyze the existing legislative provisions on property rights as an object of civil rights, although, of course, it should be noted that there are certain opinions in the legal literature and judicial practice on the subject issue. An analysis of the legislative provisions on property rights showed that they act as an object of civil rights in obligatory legal relations, in particular, as a subject of pledge, a subject of pledge of obligation rights, while the legislator identifies property rights with claim rights. Also, when considering the provisions on property rights, it was concluded that property rights should be distinguished from property legal relations in which property rights can act as an object.
How to Cite:
Netishinskaya L.F., Blagodarova N.S., (2019), PROPERTY RIGHTS AS AN OBJECT OF CIVIL RIGHTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 61-63.
Reference list:
Ob otsenochnoy deyatel nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: feder. zakon № 135-F3 ot 29.07.1998 // SZ RF. 1998. № 31. St. 3813.
O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): feder. zakon № 127-FZ ot 26.10.2002 // SZ RF. 2002. № 43. St. 4190.
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. CHast 1- M.: Statut, 1998. 290 s.
Godeme E. Obshchaya teoriya obyazatel stv. - M., 1948. 512 s.
Savat e R. Teoriya obyazatel stv. YUridicheskiy i ekonomicheskiy ocherk - M.: Progress, 1972. 440 s.
Интерес как предпосылка возникновения договорных обязательств // Журнал российского права. 2006. № 6(114) С. 108-112.
O privlechenii investitsiy s ispol zovaniem investitsionnykh platform i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: feder. zakon №259-FZ ot 02.08.2019// SZ RF.2019. №31. St.4418.
O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): feder. zakon № 127-FZ ot 26.10.2002 // SZ RF. 2002. № 43. St. 4190.
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. CHast 1- M.: Statut, 1998. 290 s.
Godeme E. Obshchaya teoriya obyazatel stv. - M., 1948. 512 s.
Savat e R. Teoriya obyazatel stv. YUridicheskiy i ekonomicheskiy ocherk - M.: Progress, 1972. 440 s.
Интерес как предпосылка возникновения договорных обязательств // Журнал российского права. 2006. № 6(114) С. 108-112.
O privlechenii investitsiy s ispol zovaniem investitsionnykh platform i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: feder. zakon №259-FZ ot 02.08.2019// SZ RF.2019. №31. St.4418.
Keywords:
property rights, right of demand, property rights, obligation rights, exclusive right to the result of intellectual activity or to a means of individualization.
