Value-legal priorities of delimitation of competence of state and local authorities in Russia
( Pp. 12-15)

More about authors
Chertkov Alexander Nikolaevich d-r yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: glavnyy nauchnyy sotrudnik. Podrazdelenie: centr issledovaniya problem territorialnogo upravleniya i samoupravleniya
Moscow State Regional University
Abstract:
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the practice of delimiting and redistributing competencies between state and municipal authorities in Russia from value-legal positions, to suggest priorities and areas for improvement. By means of the formal legal, system-structural, and comparative legal methods of cognition, it was revealed that an overly dynamic and incomplete delimitation of competence requires an understanding of key value-legal priorities in this area. It is proposed to attribute to the value-legal priorities of delimitation of competence the essential unity of public authority and its competence, the highest value of the rights and freedoms of man and society as a whole, subsidiarity and cooperation of authorities in the service of society. The result of the study can be applied in a practical analysis of the practice of delimiting, redistributing and delegating authority, assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of each authority in each constituent entity of the Russian Federation from the perspective of the above priorities. The proposed original approach will help to find a balance of value-legal priorities for delimiting the competence of state and municipal authorities in Russia, ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and society.
How to Cite:
Chertkov A.N., (2019), VALUE-LEGAL PRIORITIES OF DELIMITATION OF COMPETENCE OF STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN RUSSIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 12-15.
Reference list:
Avak yan S.A Probely i defekty v konstitutsionnom prave i puti ikh ustraneniya //Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2007. № 8 // SPS Konsul tant
Bazhenova O.I. K probleme nadeleniya munitsipal nykh obrazovaniy polnomochiyami v sfere sotsial noy podderzhki i sotsial nogo obsluzhivaniya grazhdan // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2014. № 7 // SPS Konsul tant .
Belousova E.V. Stanovlenie mestnogo samoupravleniya kak raznovidnosti publichnoy vlasti v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2016. № 1 // SPS Konsul tant .
Vasil ev V.I. Mestnoe samoupravlenie i Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii //ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2019. № 6. S. 28-35.
Eremyan V.V. Sovremennyy meksikanskiy munitsipalizm. M., 1996. - 90 s.
Poleshchenko D.A. Sootnoshenie gosudarstvennoy vlasti i mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy imperii i Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. - 215 s.
KHabrieva T.YA. Sovremennaya konstitutsiya i mestnoe samoupravlenie // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 4. // SPS Konsul tant .
CHertkov A.N. Reformirovanie federativnykh otnosheniy i garmonizatsiya federal nogo zakonodatel stva o kompetentsii federal nykh i regional nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Pravo i politika. 2007. № 12 // SPS Konsul tant .
CHertkov A.N. O printsipe edinstva gosudarstvennoy vlasti v rossiyskom gosudarstvennom prave /Konstitutsiya kak simvol epokhi. M., MGU, 2004. T. 1. S. 241-256.
CHirkin V.E. Publichnoe upravlenie. M., 2004. - 475 s.
Keywords:
delineation of competence, redistribution of powers, local self-government, value and legal priorities, unity of public authority, principle of subsidiarity.