About industry accessories housing legal relations
( Pp. 72-79)

Purpose: since housing legal relations are a classification group in the classification of legal relations according to a sectoral criterion, the problem of understanding them is essentially the problem of determining their legal status. Its solution issue is closely related to the solution of another equally significant issue - determining the place of housing law in the system of branches of Russian law. Both of these issues are debatable in the contemporary legal literary and need to be better understood. The opinions of legal experts about the role of housing law in the system of Russian law range from the recognition of housing law by the institution of civil law to providing it the status of a branch of law - either complex or non-complex (“independent”). Scientists who consider housing law as an institution of civil law solve the issue of determining the status of housing legal relations by recognizing them as civil legal relations, but at the same time, they cannot explain why such an institution of civil law as housing law has administrative legal relations. Scientists who address housing law to be a complex branch of law solve the issue of determining the status of housing legal relations by recognizing them as complex ("collective") legal relations, but concurrently they are not able to explain how the multi-branch powers "coexist" in the content of the housing legal relationship. Scientists who consider housing law a non-complex ("independent") branch of law, decide the issue of determining the status of housing legal relations either by creating a construction of "public-private legal relations", or by differentiating according to the content criterion of legal relations arising from residential premises into "legal relations in the housing sphere » and the actual housing legal relationship. As a result The article substantiates the conclusions that, firstly, neither the concept of recognition of housing law by the institution of civil law, nor the concept of recognition of housing law as a complex branch of law can be accepted due to immanent contradictions, and secondly, the construction of "public-private relations" should be rejected due to its dubious theoretical nature and, thirdly, the concept of recognition as housing only those legal relations arising from residential premises that have their own specific content that are not proper in either civil or administrative legal relations deserves support.

Mukhametova S.I., (2021), ABOUT INDUSTRY ACCESSORIES HOUSING LEGAL RELATIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 72-79.

Alekseev S. S. Teoriya prava. - M.: BEK, 1995. - 311 s.
Al bov A. P., Nikolyukin S. V. ZHilishchnoe pravo: ucheb. posobie. - M.: YUSTITSIYA, 2016. - 176 s.
Baytin M. I., Petrov D. E. Sootnoshenie otrasli prava i otrasli zakonodatel stva // Pravovedenie. - 2004. - № 4. - S. 29-40.
Bakirova E. YU. ZHilishchnoe pravo kak kompleksnaya otrasl prava // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 70-73.
Gongalo B. M., Krasheninnikov P. V. Razvitie kodifikatsii zhilishchnogo prava // Kodifikatsiya rossiyskogo chastnogo prava / pod. red. D. A. Medvedeva. - M.: Statut, 2008. - S. 150-195.
Demidov I. V. Logika: uchebnik. - M.: Izdatel sko-torgovaya korporatsiya Dashkov i K , 2012. - 348 s.
ZHilishchnoe pravo: uchebnik / Pod red. G. F. Ruchkinoy. - M.: YUSTITSIYA, 2016. - 370 s.
ZHilishchnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. I. A. Eremicheva, P. V. Aleksiya, R. A. Kurbanova. - M.: YUNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2012. - 511 s.
Inshakova A. O., Kagal nitskova N. V. ZHilishchnoe pravo v doktrine, natsional noy pravovoy i zakonodatel noy sisteme // Vestnik Volgogr. gos. un-ta. - Ser 5: YUrisprudentsiya. - 2016. - № 3 (32). - S. 9-13.
Ioffe O. S., SHargorodskiy M. D. Voprosy teorii prava. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1961. - 381 s.
Kirillov V. I., Starchenko A. A. Logika: uchebnik. - M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1987. - 271 s.
Korneev S. M. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya zhilishchnogo prava v usloviyakh stanovleniya rynochnoy ekonomiki // Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii pri perekhode k rynku: sb. nauch. statey prepodavateley kafedry grazhdanskogo prava yuridicheskogo fakul teta MGU, posvyashchennyy pamyati prof. V. P. Gribanova / otv. red. E. A. Sukhanov. - M.: DE-YURE, 1995.- S. 146-172.
Korneeva I. L. ZHilishchnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik i praktikum. - M.: YUrayt, 2020. - 450 s.
Krasavchikov O. A. Sovetskaya nauka grazhdanskogo prava (ponyatie, predmet, sostav i sistema) // Krasavchikov O. A. Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava: Izbr. trudy: V 2 t. T. 1. - M.: Statut, 2005. - S. 115-489.
Krasheninnikov P. V. ZHilishchnoe pravo. - M.: Statut, 2017. - 415 s.
Normy sovetskogo prava. Problemy teorii / pod red. M. I. Baytina, V. K. Babaeva. - Saratov: izd-vo Saratov. un-ta, 1987. - 248 s.
Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Akademicheskiy kurs: V 2-kh t. / otv. red. M. N. Marchenko. T. 2. Teoriya prava. - M.: Zertsalo, 1998. - 640 s.
Obshchaya teoriya prava: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A. S. Pigolkina. - M.: izd-vo MGTU im. N. E. Baumana, 1997. - 384 s.
Ozhegov S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. - M.: OOO A TEMP , 2006. - 944 s.
Raykher V. K. Obshchestvenno-istoricheskie tipy strakhovaniya. - M.-L.: izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1947. - 283 s.
Sverdlyk G. A. Stanovlenie zhilishchnogo prava kak kompleksnoy otrasli prava (istoricheskiy aspekt razvitiya s 60-kh godov proshlogo veka po nastoyashchee vremya) // ZHilishchnoe pravo. - 2007. - № 4. - S. 20-30.
Sedugin P. I. ZHilishchnoe pravo: uchebnik. - M.: Norma, 2003. - 384 s.
Suslova S. I. ZHilishchnoe pravootnoshenie: metodologiya issledovaniya // https://justicemaker.ru/view-article.php id 5 art 2440
Suslova S. I. Kompleksnost zhilishchnogo prava: kriticheskiy analiz // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. - 2010. - № 2 (22). - S. 72-76.
Suslova S. I. Pravovye formy zhilishchnykh otnosheniy: avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. - M., 2015. - 38 s.
Tarasova A. E. ZHilishchnoe pravo kak chastno-publichnaya otrasl prava // https://center-bereg.ru/a534.html
Tarasova A. E. Sistema i printsipy postroeniya chastnykh i chastno-publichnykh otrasley prava (kontseptual nye polozheniya) // Severo-Kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2010. - № 4. - S. 35-40.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / pod red. V. K. Babaeva. - M.: YUrist , 2003. - 592 s.
Titov A. A. ZHilishchnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik. - M.: YUrayt, 2020. - 502 s.
Tolstoy YU. K. ZHilishchnoe pravo: uchebnik. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. - 192 s.
Tolstoy YU. K. O teoreticheskikh osnovakh kodifikatsii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva // Pravovedenie. - 1957. - № 1. - S. 42-55.
Filippova E. S. ZHilishchnoe pravo Rossii: ucheb. posobie. - M.: YURKOMPANI, 2009. - 325 s.
CHigir V. F. Sovetskoe zhilishchnoe pravo // CHigir V. F. Izbr. trudy. - Minsk: Redaktsiya zhurnala Promyshlenno-torgovoe pravo , 2014. - S. 225-432.
YAkovlev V. F. Osnovy zhilishchnogo zakonodatel stva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik i rezhim pravovogo regulirovaniya zhilishchnykh otnosheniy // YAkovlev V. F. Izbr. trudy. T. 2: Grazhdanskoe pravo: Istoriya i sovremennost . Kn. 1. - M.: Statut, 2012. - S. 543-552.

legal status of housing law, branch classification of legal relations, housing legal relations, content of housing legal relations.