VERDICT OF THE JURY: SEPARATE PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS
( Pp. 246-248)

More about authors
Fadeeva Elena I. Cand. Sci. (Law), senior lecturer of the Department of criminal procedure, justice and prosecutorial supervision
National research Mordovia state University. N. P. Ogarev
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article deals with the problematic aspects of the verdict of the jury in criminal cases. These issues are considered by the author in connection with the introduction of amendments to the code of criminal procedure in 2018, concerning the consideration of criminal cases by the said court. The conclusions contained in the article, we believe, will be useful for further theoretical development on the problems raised in the article, in order to further improve the legislation and for practitioners.
How to Cite:
Fadeeva E.I., (2018), VERDICT OF THE JURY: SEPARATE PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 246-248.
Reference list:
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.12.2004 № 4-O04-148SP. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 4 (2015) quot; (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 23.12.2015) (red. ot 26.04.2017). Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Belkin A. Spornye dostoinstva i ochevidnye nedostatki suda prisyazhnykh // Mirovoy sud ya. 2009. № 1. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus
Vladykina T.A. Soblyudenie protsessual nogo sroka vyneseniya verdikta - garantiya stabil nosti prigovora suda prisyazhnykh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 11. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24 avgusta 2017 g. № 26-APU17-2SP. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Obzor praktiki Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii za pervoe polugodie 2014 goda quot; (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 02.07.2014). Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .