CLASSIFICATION OF THE REDUCED PROCEDURES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PECULIARITIES AND GENERALIZATION OF THE POSITIVE EXPERIENCE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
( Pp. 206-209)

Purpose: the subject of the research is the peculiarities of the activities of participants in reduced pre-trial proceedings on crimes of small and medium gravity, the classification of reduced criminal procedure procedures and regulations governing this activity, as well as domestic historical and foreign experience in the field of reduced forms of pre-trial proceedings and law enforcement practice. Objectives of the study: to determine theoretical basic concepts, structure and classification of signs of reduced forms of pre-trial proceedings; establish the historical patterns of development of reduced forms of criminal proceedings in domestic pre-trial proceedings. The scope of the study cover the Soviet period (second half of the XX century) to the present. Practical significance: consists in the fact that the proposed classification can be used in improving the criminal procedure legislation, in creating programs for organizing the activities of the bodies conducting preliminary investigations, will make it possible to carry out work related to the investigation of crimes in criminal cases with greater efficiency, ensuring full rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. The general methodological base of the research is represented by the following general scientific methods of knowledge: dialectical, historical, logical, comparative legal, statistical, sociological and other methods of research. Findings: the classification presented by the author is given to highlight the most significant qualities required for the formation of new or modernization of already existing accelerated procedures of criminal proceedings, allowing to optimize the activities of participants in the process.

Gubarev I.S., (2019), CLASSIFICATION OF THE REDUCED PROCEDURES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PECULIARITIES AND GENERALIZATION OF THE POSITIVE EXPERIENCE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 206-209.

YU.K. YAkimovich, T.D. Pan. Sudebnoe proizvodstvo po UPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii. SPb. : YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2005. 252 s.
Bochkarev A.E. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve RF : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir, 2005. 213 s.
SHmarev A.I. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva (voprosy teorii i praktiki) : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 226 s.
Rustamov KH.U. Differentsiatsiya form ugolovnogo protsessa (Sovremennye tendentsii i problemy sovershenstvovaniya) : avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1998. 40 s
Kukushkin P., Kurchenko V.N. Zaochnoe sudebnoe razbiratel stvo // Zakonnost . 2007. № 7
Zelenetskiy V.S. Struktura sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa // Problemy pravovedeniya. Respublikanskiy mezhvedomstvennyy nauchnyy sbornik. Kiev : Izd-vo pri Kievskom gosudarstvennom universitete Izdatel skogo ob edineniya VISHCHA SHKOLA , 1982. Vyp. 42. S. 100-107.
Gavrilov B.YA. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme: zakonodatel nye mify i realii pravoprimeneniya. Tekst / B.YA. Gavrilov // Baikal Researh Journal Baykal skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta - 2014 №6. // URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp id 22669177(data obrashcheniya 05.12.2016.).
Red kin N.V. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva v sisteme ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2007. 195 s.
Plyasunova A.A. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva kak uproshchennaya forma ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva : avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Orenburg, 2008. 20 s
Popov I.A. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme: dostoinstva, nedostatki i pervye rezul taty // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2013.
Gavrilov B.YA. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po UPK RF: kontseptsiya sovershenstvovaniya // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1.