CONTENT OF THE SUBJECT OF PROOF WHEN DISCLOSING INFORMATION ON SAFETY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 146-149)

More about authors
Lanshakov Dmitry Sergeevich aspirant.
Syktyvkar state University named after Pitirim Sorokin
Abstract:
Purpose, objective: The subject of proof in criminal proceedings is of systemic importance in connection with the content in it of the most important and necessary to prove the circumstances of the commission of the crime. In order to understand the individual elements of the subject matter of proof according to the specific composition of the crime, it is necessary to find out the specifics of each of them. For this purpose, we have considered specific problems of the substantive side of the circumstances included in the subject of evidence in the criminal case of the crime provided for in article 311 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The specificity of these circumstances is related to the conduct of criminal proceedings of the evidence procedure. In the prosecution of cases of this category, there may be problems of criminal legal qualification and the scope (content) of the charge specified in the order to bring as accused, indictment or sentence of the court. Methodology: In the course of the scientific research carried out, such general and private scientific methods of research as induction, derivation, generalization, comparison, formalization, etc., were applied. Conclusions: 1. The safety of participants in criminal proceedings is an important guarantee of achieving the objective of criminal proceedings and the process of proof. It is cross-sectoral and is considered from various sides. 2. The process of ensuring the safe participation of citizens in criminal proceedings is strictly confidential in the event of a threat to the life, health and other benefits of the protected person. Therefore, one security guarantee is the confidentiality of all (any) information that is related to the protective measures applied. 3. The problem of proof is the obligation to apply in the process of proof not only objective and subjective characteristics of the composition of Article 311 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but also other laws and legal acts. 4. The proof of the offence under investigation (art. 311 of the Criminal Code) is also complicated by the fact that it competes with the characteristics of the offence under article 320 of the Criminal Code, which imposes certain difficulties in the criminal proceedings. 5. In judicial practice, a situation of problematic content may arise concerning the separation of criminal disclosure from administrative misconduct (Article 17.13 "Disclosure of information on security measures"). This also imposes a certain problem in proving the circumstances established in article 73 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Possibility of subsequent use: the results can be useful in the process of improvement of sectoral legal acts in the field of application and implementation of criminal and criminal procedure legislation, To continue scientific research in the field of regulation of the security of participants in criminal proceedings, Optimization of procedural and related mechanisms for the implementation of individual security measures, To improve judicial and investigative practice, as well as in the training of future lawyers. The practical significance of the work presented may be expressed in the use of its results in the law enforcement process in the investigation and trial of criminal cases of offences aimed at disclosing information on security measures applied to participants in criminal proceedings. The social significance of the results obtained is revealed indirectly, through the optimization of the legislative regulation of criminal law and criminal procedure relations, the enhancement of not only the process of proof in a criminal case, but also the legal protection of the rights of citizens in the course of criminal proceedings. The value of the results obtained is expressed in the very definition of the problem of the content of the circumstances to be proved in relation to the composition of the offence provided for in article 311 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, from a criminal procedure position. The study is aimed at obtaining new knowledge of the subject matter of proof in criminal cases involving offences under article 311 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. These conclusions can be useful both for the legislator in the preparation of draft laws and in the formation of judicial practice in order to improve the safety of persons involved in criminal proceedings. This work may be of interest to scientists and practitioners, as well as students and postgraduate students of law universities.
How to Cite:
Lanshakov D.S., (2019), CONTENT OF THE SUBJECT OF PROOF WHEN DISCLOSING INFORMATION ON SAFETY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 146-149.
Reference list:
Goryainov K.K., Pudakov E.R. Faktory, oslozhnyayushchie provedenie rassledovaniya prestupleniy korruptsionnoy napravlennosti // Ugolovno-ispolnitel naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2016. N 6. S. 6 - 8.
Dmitrieva A.A. Problemy primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity i obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov protsessa v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 150-155.
Epikhin A.YU. K voprosu o nadzore (kontrole) za obespecheniem bezopasnosti lichnosti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2004. № 3. S. 359.
Epikhin A.YU. Nekotorye problemy rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva, obespechivayushchego bezopasnost zhertv prestupleniy kak uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // V sbornike: Rol prokuratury i kontroliruyushchikh organov v obespechenii ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti. Materialy naun.-prakt. Konf., 19-20 dek. 2003 g. otv. red. N.P. Dudin. SPb., 2004. S. 83-85.
Epikhin A.YU. Povody i osnovaniya primeneniya i realizatsii mer bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Komi respublikanskoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i upravleniya. Seriya: Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 7. S. 4-11.
Epikhin A.YU. Predposylki primeneniya mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // V sbornike: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual nye problemy nauki i praktiki. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie: opyt, problemy, perspektivy. Tol yatti, 2004. S. 180-183.
Epikhin A.YU. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v novom UPK RF // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I.Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. 2003. № 1. S. 115-122.
Zaytsev O.A. O realizatsii sovremennoy ugolovno-protsessual noy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. № 5. S.152-156.
Zaytsev O.A. Svideteli i inye litsa, sodeystvuyushchie pravosudiyu // Sledovatel . 2002. № 2.
Zaytsev O.A. Stepen nauchnoy razrabotannosti problem gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ugolovnaya yustitsiya. 2014. № 2 (4). S. 18-23.
Zakon RF ot 26.06.1992 N 3132-1 (red. ot 02.08.2019) quot;O statuse sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; // Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 30.07.1992. N 30. St. 1792.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 13.08.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 07.01.2002. N 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Kolosovich M.S., Kolosovich O.S., Smol yakov P.P. Gosudarstvennaya zashchita uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kak sredstvo obespecheniya ikh prav i zakonnykh interesov // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 10. S. 2303 - 2309.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.07.2009 N GKPI09-792 // Vestnik Vysshey kvalifikatsionnoy kollegii sudey RF. 2010. N 4.
Rudyy N.K. Razglashenie svedeniy o merakh bezopasnosti, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii dolzhnostnogo litsa pravookhranitel nogo ili kontroliruyushchego organa // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. Spetsial nyy vypusk. Sentyabr .
Federal nyy zakon ot 20.04.1995 N 45-FZ (red. ot 01.07.2017) quot;O gosudarstvennoy zashchite sudey, dolzhnostnykh lits pravookhranitel nykh i kontroliruyushchikh organov quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 24.04.1995. N 17. St. 1455.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20.08.2004 N 119-FZ (red. ot 07.02.2017) quot;O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva quot; // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23.08.2004. N 34. St. 3534.
SHCHerba S.P., Zaytsev O.A. Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1992. № 9-10. S. 16.
Keywords:
security, protection of witnesses and victims, criminal case, criminal justice, opposition to investigation, disclosure of information, confidentiality, subject of proof.


Related Articles

1. NATIONAL ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT 08.00.05 Pages: 22-28 Issue №19146
ALGORITHM OF MAKING MANAGEMENT DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROCKET AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE STATE DEFENSE ORDER
risks security process certainty uncertainty
Show more
5. Criminology Pages: 175-178 Issue №3636
On the informal youth associations extremist
extremist activities security perfectionism youth extremism the motivation of criminal behavior
Show more
11. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 218-221 Issue №15895
ABOUT SOME MISTAKES MADE IN THE COURSE OF ESTABLISHING THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE UNKNOWN DISAPPEARANCE OF MINORS
missing person minor investigation investigator forensic investigator
Show more
11. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 12.00.09 Pages: 290-294 Issue №18758
Temporary suspension of the suspect and the accused: the grounds and the procedural order of application
criminal case suspect accused temporary suspension from office grounds
Show more
9. Criminal procedure Pages: 187-188 Issue №9149
Typical mistakes made by investigators during the investigative experiment
the investigator investigative errors investigative experiment criminal case
Show more
2. CURRENT PROBLEMS OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS STAFF IN MODERN CONDITIONS Pages: 185-188 Issue №16988
Structure of General principles of training in special tactics and fire training in the system of professional education of police officers
professional training listener principles tactical and special training fire training
Show more
12. OTHER Pages: 164-169 Issue №2490
The rule of law in the units of internal affairs bodies and their regulation
administrative security office citizen discipline
Show more
9. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 175-177 Issue №6543
MAIN AREAS INTERNAL SECURITY FMS RUSSIA
security internal security corruption the threat of corruption
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 154-157 Issue №11481
CONCEPT OF THE OCCASION, BASIS AND CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION OF SECURITY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
the protection of witnesses and victims reason base criminal case the adoption of procedural decisions
Show more
4. CRIMINAL LAW DISCIPLINES Pages: 259-265 Issue №19964
Features of the Institution of Civil Action in Criminal Proceedings: Practical Aspects
civil action cross-sectoral institution criminal justice civil claimant civil defendant
Show more