CONTENT OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE COURT, WHEN APPLYING THE SPECIAL ORDER REVISED BY CHAPTER 40 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: PROOF OR QUASI-PROOF?
( Pp. 126-128)

More about authors
Turilov Georgy Georgievich kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa.
Kuban state University
Abstract:
This article examines very important and complex questions about the nature of the court’s activities in criminal cases in accordance with Chapter 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. To this end, scientific views on the problem under study were studied, legislation was analyzed, including foreign, and, of course, practice. Based on these elements, the author’s conclusion is formulated and proposals are made to amend the legislation in order to eliminate ambiguity in this matter.
How to Cite:
Turilov G.G., (2019), CONTENT OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE COURT, WHEN APPLYING THE SPECIAL ORDER REVISED BY CHAPTER 40 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: PROOF OR QUASI-PROOF?. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 126-128.
Reference list:
Boyarskaya A.V. KHarakter i posledstviya preobrazovaniya predmeta dokazyvaniya v ramkakh osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel stva // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. - Seriya Pravo . - 2010. - № 3 (24).- S. 203-208.
Blinova O.G. Vozmozhno li vynesenie pravosudnogo prigovora pri osobom poryadke prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya // Sudebnaya vlast i ugolovnyy protsess. - 2019. №1. - S.57-60.
Prigovor po delu Evseeva V.A. obvinyaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch.2 st. 318 UK RF № 1-134/17 ot 18 maya 2017 goda po delu № 1-134/17 // Arkhiv Dinskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya. 2017.
Udges handbook for criminal cases // https:// zimlii.org/content/judges-handbook-criminal-cases.
Keywords:
court, court hearing, evidence, quasi-proof, sentence.