Use of judicial and economic examinations in the investigation of intentional bankruptcy
( Pp. 277-280)

More about authors
Khachidogov Ruslan Aslanovich Police Major, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Fire Training
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
Economic crimes pose a particular threat to the development of the Russian state. Among the most common economic crimes, intentional bankruptcy should be highlighted. Given the serious damage that deliberate bankruptcy can cause, one of the priority areas of law enforcement activity at present is an effective investigation of these crimes. The purpose of writing a research paper is to analyze the process of using forensic examinations in the investigation of intentional bankruptcies. The article states that through these examinations on the fact of deliberate bankruptcy, a check can be made on the compliance of accounting documents with the actual state of the organization, a check on the organization’s assessment and the movement of fixed assets.
How to Cite:
Khachidogov R.A., (2020), USE OF JUDICIAL AND ECONOMIC EXAMINATIONS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF INTENTIONAL BANKRUPTCY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 277-280.
Reference list:
Belyakova E.G. Aktual nye problemy sudebnoy finansovo-ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy po delam o prednamerennom bankrotstve yuridicheskikh lits // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019. № 9 (106). S. 123-129.
Kanatov E.S. Nekotorye problemy proverki soobshcheniya o prestupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 6. S. 249-253.
Morodumov R.N., Markov S.E. Provedenie ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy pri rassledovanii prednamerennykh bankrotstv // Lichnost , pravo, gosudarstvo. 2017. № 4. S. 140-151.
Prorvich V.A., Semenova E.A. Matrichnyy podkhod k formirovaniyu chastnykh ekspertnykh metodik dlya polucheniya dokazatel stv pri rassledovanii kriminal nykh bankrotstv // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. № 1. S. 212-215.
Prorvich V.A., Semenova E.A., Kuz mina M.YU., Mikhaylova A.V. Osobennosti formirovaniya algoritmov sudebno-ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy dlya opredeleniya spravedlivoy i likvidatsionnoy stoimosti zakladnoy v sluchayakh obrashcheniya na neye vzyskaniya // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. № 2. S. 76-79.
Rastoropov S.V., Prorvich V.A. Rol sudebno-ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy v ugolovno-pravovoy zashchite konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan, organizatsiy i gosudarstva // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. № 6. S. 377-380.
Savitskiy A.A. Aktual nye problemy naznacheniya i proizvodstva sudebnykh finansovo-analiticheskikh ekspertiz // Vestnik universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). 2018. № 7 (47). S. 94-102.
Savitskiy A.A. K voprosu ob ob ektakh issledovaniya sudebnoy ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy // Vestnik universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). 2019. № 5 (57). S. 105-114.
Sinel nikova E.YU. K voprosu o kriminalisticheskoy kharakteristike kriminal nogo bankrotstva po ugolovnym delam // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2018. № 6. S. 107-109.
Ten A.N. Opredelenie momenta okonchaniya nepravomernykh deystviy pri bankrotstve i prednamerennykh bankrotstv // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. № 5. S. 133-137.
Keywords:
economic crimes, deliberate bankruptcy, forensic economic examination, investigation of intentional bankruptcy, criminal procedure.