PROBLEMS OF INSTITUTE UNDERSTOOD IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS
( Pp. 69-72)

More about authors
Shigurova Elena I. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Justice and Prosecutorial Supervision of the Law Institute
National Research Mordovia State University
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation Shigurov Alexander V. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law and criminalistics of the Faculty of Law
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article analyzes a number of topical issues of the legal regulation of the participation of the witness in criminal proceedings. Based on the results of the analysis of law enforcement practice, the authors propose to legislatively fix the possibility of attracting relatives as relatives as witnesses to allow repeated participation of the witness in various investigative actions. Conclusions are drawn about the shortcomings of the legal regulation of the right of the witness to reimbursement of expenses and the need to index the amount of sums received by the witnesses.
How to Cite:
Shigurova E.I., Shigurov A.V., (2018), PROBLEMS OF INSTITUTE UNDERSTOOD IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 69-72.
Reference list:
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Amurskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11.07.2013 po delu № 22-1151/13 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 05.11.2013 po delu № 10-10766 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.01.2015 po delu № 22-96/15, 22-7944/2014 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 06.08.2015 po delu № 22-6422/2015 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 09.06.2016 po delu № 22-4246/2016 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
D yakonova O.G., SHCHepotin P.V. O neobkhodimosti vvedeniya obyazatel nogo videoprotokolirovaniya sudebnogo zasedaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. - 2016. - № 6. - S. 55-57.
Kalinkina L.D., Krysina N.R., Sotkova V.V., Sukhova O.A., SHigurova E.I. Ugolovnyy protsess: v voprosakh i otvetakh: uchebnoe posobie. - Saransk, 2017. - 58 s.
O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Federal nyy zakon ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ // SZ RF. - 2013. - № 9. - St. 875.
O poryadke i razmere vozmeshcheniya protsessual nykh izderzhek, svyazannykh s proizvodstvom po ugolovnomu delu, izderzhek v svyazi s rassmotreniem dela arbitrazhnym sudom, grazhdanskogo dela, administrativnogo dela, a takzhe raskhodov v svyazi s vypolneniem trebovaniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii i o priznanii utrativshimi silu nekotorykh aktov Soveta Ministrov RSFSR i Pravitel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 01.12.2012 № 1240 // SZ RF. - 2012. - № 50 (ch. 6). - St. 7058.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tyva ot 30.01.2014 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Prigovor mirovogo sud i sudebnogo uchastka № 1 Krasnotur inskogo sudebnogo rayona Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 24.03.2014 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-12/2014 // Krasnotur inskiy sudebnyy rayon Sverdlovskoy oblasti: sayt. URL: http://1kar.svd.msudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo op sd number 110434609 case number 85654816 delo id 1540006 (data obrashcheniya: 24.09.2018).
Sushkova YU.N. O deyatel nosti volostnykh sudov (po dokumentam tsentral nogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Respubliki Mordoviya) // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. - 2017. - № 2. - S. 161-165.
CHistilina D.O. Povyshenie effektivnosti pravosudiya putem reformirovaniya ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva // Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossii: uroki istorii i problemy dal neyshego reformirovaniya: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. - Orel, 2016. - S. 403-406.