The phenomenon of obviousness and uncertainty of an objective approach to understanding the corpus delicti through the prism of the views of scientists of the late 19th - early 21st centuries
( Pp. 151-155)

Today, it seems possible to state the presence of dualism within the general doctrine of the corpus delicti. In contrast to the «normative», the representatives of the objectivist approach consider the corpus delicti, along with the crime, as a real phenomenon. Namely, only a system of elements and signs embodied in objective reality can form the composition of a specific crime committed. The presented understanding makes it possible to determine the corpus delicti as the only basis for criminal liability, as well as to build the correlation between the crime and the corpus delicti as one-order categories. However, a detailed study and critical analysis of the works of scientists, representatives of this approach, allow us to point out a number of problems that indicate its theoretical incompleteness, and as a consequence, requiring study and improvement. As a result, the author of the article presents the key points in the evolution of scientific thought about the formation and development of an objectivist approach to understanding the corpus delicti from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 21st century, allowing you to get a holistic view of its phenomenon, including both obvious and contradictory aspects. Subject of research: norms of the current criminal legislation, which are based on the category of corpus delicti, published scientific works (article, monographs) and educational materials devoted to the general doctrine of the corpus delicti. Purpose: the formation in the science of criminal law of a system understanding of the phenomenon of an objective approach to understanding the corpus delicti, its main provisions and controversial aspects, aimed at overcoming the existing and achieving a unified understanding of the corpus delicti. Conclusion: Since, within the framework of the objectivist approach, the corpus delicti, the elements and features that form its structure, are considered as real phenomena, it becomes possible to structure a specific crime, as well as to establish the basis of criminal liability. However, a number of provisions do not allow to recognize this vision of the corpus delicti as devoid of contradictions.

Komyagin R.A., (2020), THE PHENOMENON OF OBVIOUSNESS AND UNCERTAINTY OF AN OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE CORPUS DELICTI THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE VIEWS OF SCIENTISTS OF THE LATE 19TH - EARLY 21ST CENTURIES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 151-155.

Babiy N.A. Uchenie o strukture i sostave prestupleniya: monografiya. V 2 kn. Kn. 1. Ponyatie struktury i sostava prestupleniya. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2019.
Belogrits-Kotlyarevskiy L.S. Uchebnik Russkogo Ugolovnogo prava. CHast 1. M.: YUzhno-russkoe knigoizdatel stvo F.A. YUgansona, 1903. CHast 1.
Borbat A.V., Zavidov B.D., Endol tseva A.V., Milevskiy A.I. Sostav prestupleniya kak osnovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (problemnye voprosy ugolovnogo prava Rossii) /// SPS Konsul tantPlyus , 2005.
Gerasimov A.M. Obshchestvennaya opasnost prestupleniya: ponyatie, struktura, sushchnostnye kharakteristiki. Mir yuridicheskoy nauki. № 8. 2018.
Karpushin M.P., Kurlyandskiy V.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost i sostav prestupleniya. M., YUridicheskaya literatura , 1974.
Krylova N.E. Diskussionnye voprosy ucheniya o sostave prestupleniya. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 11. Pravo. 2012. № 4.
Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: Lektsii po spetskursu Osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy / Nauch. red. i predisl. akademika V.N. Kudryavtseva. - M.: Izdatel skiy Dom Gorodets , 2007.
Morozov V.I., Losev S.G. Ponyatie sostava prestupleniya v otechestvennoy teorii ugolovnogo prava. YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika, № 2 (40). 2017.
N.F. Kuznetsova, V.N. Kudryavtsev. Izbrannye trudy (sbornik). Izd-vo YUridicheskiy tsent Press , 2003.
Orazdurdyev A.M. Vidy sostavov prestupleniy v ugolovnom prave: monografiya. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2019.
Plotnikov A.I. Ob ektivnoe i sub ektivnoe v prestuplenii. Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. M. 2012.
Sakharov A.B. K voprosu o ponyatii sostava prestupleniya. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1952. № 7.
Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. CHast Obshchaya / pod red. V.D. Men shagina, N.D. Durmanova, P.S. Romashkina. M., 1962.
Solodov I.A. Obshchestvennaya opasnost prestupleniya i ee ugolovno-pravovoe izmerenie. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2013.
Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. T. 1. Tula, 2001.
Ter-Akopov A.A. Prestuplenie i problemy nefizicheskoy prichinnosti v ugolovnom prave. M.: YUrkniga. 2003.
Traynin A.N. Obshchee uchenie o sostave prestupleniya. M., Gosyurizdat. 1957.
Traynin A.N. Sostav prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Gosyurizdat. M., 1951.
Filimonov V.D. Norma ugolovnogo prava. SPb.: Izdatel stvo R. Aslanova YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004.
CHankhay Lun. Uchenie o sostave prestupleniya po ugolovnomu pravu KNR i Rossii: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Vladivostok, 2009.

corpus delicti, objectivist approach, crime, correlation of crime and corpus delicti, grounds for criminal liability.