The principle of proportionality as an effective tool for the protection of electoral rights
( Pp. 32-37)

The purpose of the work is to analyze the practice of implementing the principle of proportionality in the field of electoral legal relations. The authors set the task to show the features of the practical significance of the principle of proportionality. As a result of the study, the authors emphasize that there is a normative, interpretive and procedural relationship between the constitutional principles of electoral law and the principle of proportionality, which ensures effective protection of electoral rights. Through the principles, as regulators of public relations, it is possible to effectively implement the concept of the rule of law. In the modern period, it is the principles, as universal regulators of social relations that have an integrative nature, that can allow maintaining the parity of interests in the chain of man-society-public power, where man is the highest value and create a model of sustainable development of legal regulation. The authors emphasize that the importance of the principle of proportionality as an effective tool for protecting electoral rights is constantly growing.

Aleshkova I.A., Filatova A.O., (2020), THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY AS AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR THE PROTECTION OF ELECTORAL RIGHTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 32-37.

Vlasenko N.A. Konkurentsiya printsipov prava // YUridicheskaya tekhnika. 2020. №14. S.46-53.
Gritsenko E.V. Obespechenie osnovnykh garantiy izbiratel nykh prav v usloviyakh informatizatsii izbiratel nogo protsessa // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2020. №5. S. 41 - 49.
Knyazev, S. D. Printsipy rossiyskogo izbiratel nogo prava //Pravovedenie. 1998. №2. - S. 20 - 31;
Kolyushin E.I. Vybory i izbiratel noe pravo v zerkale sudebnykh resheniy. - M.: Norma. - 2012. - 384 s.;
Kochev V.A., Romashov P.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya priroda instituta referenduma // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2019. №3. S. 386 - 417;
Lebedeva N.V. Printsipy izbiratel nogo prava: ponyatie i problemy pravovogo zakrepleniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2016. №9. S. 56 - 61;
Makartsev A.A. Printsip proportsional nosti v sudebnykh resheniyakh po izbiratel nym sporam kak adekvatnaya forma zashchity aktivnogo i passivnogo izbiratel nogo prava // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. №6 (43). S. 1077-1083;
Nudnenko L.A. Printsipy passivnogo izbiratel nogo prava: sistema i vzaimodeystvie s konstitutsionnymi pravami i svobodami lichnosti v Rossii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. №10. S. 48-54;
Poroshin E.N. Passivnoe izbiratel noe pravo v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i real nost // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2020. №3. S. 46 - 54 i dr.
Serbin M.V. Problemy izbiratel nogo prava Rossii // Lex russica. 2017. №2. S. 217 - 222 i dr.
Tolstykh V.D. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie i printsip proportsional nosti // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2009. №12 (44). S.47-56.
Umnova-Konyukhova I.A. Obshchie printsipy prava v konstitutsionnom prave i mezhdunarodnom prave: aktual nye voprosy teorii i praktiki. M, 2019.S 36-39.
Filatova A.O. Printsipy sudebnoy zashchity izbiratel nogo prava byt izbrannym v pravovykh pozitsiyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. №12 (103). 2016. S.94-95.

principles of constitutional law, principles of electoral law and process, the principle of proportionality, electoral legal relations, election commissions, elections.