Features of the lens side assignments and expenditures made in financial and credit organizations
( Pp. 165-170)

More about authors
Gorbunova Svetlana Eduardovna soiskatel kafedry ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii; Advokat, Predsedatel kollegii advokatov
Lomonosov Moscow state University; Moscow specialized bar Association "EXITUM"
Abstract:
The objective side of appropriation and embezzlement in the banking sector involves the seizure, circulation of other people's money (assets) in favor of the guilty one, which means the rejection, separation of part of the money (assets) from their total mass, which is in the possession of the owner or owner. In the banking sector, funds are unlawfully seized to which the perpetrator (bank employee) had access. As a result of their withdrawal, they are removed from the ownership of the owner, separated from his other assets, like the assets of the bank, which deprives the owner of the actual opportunity to own, use and dispose of, and the bank - to store and manage monetary funds (assets) at its discretion. As a rule, in the banking sector, embezzlement becomes a continuation of appropriation, since the guilty person from the possession of funds passes to their illegal alienation, acting out of selfish motives. Embezzlement after appropriation should be considered a more serious act, which is advisable to take into account in the regulation of the punishment. It is proposed to consolidate in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation a provision according to which successively committed appropriation, followed by waste, should be considered a qualifying feature of the latter. Also, criminal prosecution on the fact of misappropriation (including in the banking sector), as a crime against property, should be placed among those compositions where the case is initiated solely at the request of the victim (in this case, the bank).
How to Cite:
Gorbunova S.E., (2020), FEATURES OF THE LENS SIDE ASSIGNMENTS AND EXPENDITURES MADE IN FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ORGANIZATIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 165-170.
Reference list:
SHkele M.V. Ob ektivnaya storona prestupleniya// YUridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost . 2019. № 4. S. 119-138.
Begishev I.R., Bikeev I.I. Prestupleniya v sfere obrashcheniya tsifrovoy informatsii. Kazan , 2020. Ser. TSifrovaya bezopasnost .
Danilov A.V. Kvalifikatsiya prisvoeniya i rastraty, sovershaemykh v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2004.
Dokshokov A.Z. Ob ektivnaya storona prisvoeniya i rastraty chuzhogo imushchestva// Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2008. №1.
Lysov M.D. Logiko-strukturnyy analiz ponyatiy i priznakov prestupleniy v deystvuyushchem Ugolovnom kodekse RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1997. № 12. S. 74-78.
Kochoi S.M. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: Kratkiy kurs. M.: Kontrakt, Volters Kluver, 2010.
Sklyarov S.V. Ponyatie khishcheniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve Rossii: teoreticheskiy analiz// Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1997. № 9. S. 64-68. S. 66.
Foynitskiy I.YA. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. CHast Osobennaya. SPb., 1907. S. 298.
Kurinov B.A. Nauchnye osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1984. - 181 c.
Piontkovskiy A.A. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. T. 4. M., 1970.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu RF. Rostov n/D., 2014.
Vladimirov V.A., Lyapunov YU.I. Otvetstvennost za korystnye posyagatel stva na sobstvennost . M.: YUrid. lit., 1986. 224 c.
Vladimirov V.A., Lyapunov YU.I. Sobstvennost pod okhranoy zakona. M., 1979.
Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti / Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. - 3-e izd., ispr. - M.: YUrInfoR, 2002. - 310 c.
Bor ba s khishcheniyami, sovershaemymi putem prisvoeniya, rastraty i zloupotrebleniya sluzhebnym polozheniem. M., 1980.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osobennaya chast : Uchebnik / Pod red. G.N. Borzenkova, V.S. Komisarova. S. 215.
Tropin S.A. Otvetstvennost za khishchenie imushchestva, sovershennoe putem prisvoeniya ili rastraty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. M., 1991. 175 c.
Klepitskiy I.A. Sistema khozyaystvennykh prestupleniy. M.: Statut, 2005. 572 c.
Lopatin V.V., Lopatina L.E. Russkiy tolkovyy slovar . M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1998.
Eriashvili N.D. Ob ektivnye priznaki prisvoeniya i rastraty// Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. №9. S. 227-236.
Fratianni M., Marchionne F. The Role of Banks in the Subprime Financial Crisis available on SSRN. 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm abstract id 1383473
Dal V. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. T. 3. M., 2009. S. 1 640.
Ozhegov S.I., SHvedova N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. M., 2015. S. 656.
Kriger G.A. Kvalifikatsiya khishcheniy sotsialisticheskogo imushchestva. M.: YUrid. lit., 1971. - 360 c.
Eliseev S.A. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti: kurs lektsiy. Tomsk: Izd. Dom Tomskogo gos. un-ta, 2018.
Keywords:
appropriation, waste, objective side, bank, financial and credit organization.