On the classification of forensic examinations as criminalistic
( Pp. 265-268)
More about authors
Rasul A. Kuchmezov
Cand.Sci. (Pedagogics), Police Major, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Law Enforcement Organization
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
Abstract:
In modern science and forensics, classification of forensic examinations deserves special consideration. The basis for the correct classification is the most essential strictly scientific and objective feature specified in the work by N.A. Selivanov [1, p. 52]. Today, when studying the section of forensic science "forensic techniques", knowledge and methods of forensic examination are considered simultaneously with the questions of detection, fixation and subsequent seizure of traces, their further role in the detection and investigation of crimes. Recently, the integration of scientific knowledge in all areas of expert activity has been clearly traced, as evidenced by scientific work in the field of complexity and integration of expert research. Against this background, the process of formation of new classes, births and kinds has been actively continued. The article considers the complexity of the fact that the investigative and judicial practice requires experts to solve equally important non-identification issues. Such issues include determination of the event mechanism, determination of the method and time characteristics, determination of quantitative criteria of objects, presence of changes in time intervals of the event, etc.
How to Cite:
Rasul A.K., (2020), ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS AS CRIMINALISTIC. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 265-268.
Reference list:
Selivanov N.A. i dr. Sovetskaya kriminalistika. Teoreticheskie problemy. M.: 1978, s. 52.
Kardanov, R.R. Tendentsii razvitiya vozmozhnostey identifikatsionnykh sudebno-ballisticheskikh ekspertiz / R.R. Kardanov // Doklady Adygskoy (CHerkesskoy) Mezhdunarodnoy akademii nauk. 2015. T. 17. № 1.
Kuchmezov, R.A. K voprosu o ponyatii veshchestvennye dokazatel stva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / R.A. Kuchmezov // Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki. 2017. T. 6. № 4.
Kondakov N.I. Logicheskiy slovar . M., 1971.
Rossinskaya E.R. Sovremennye problemy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh poznaniy v sudoproizvodstve // Sudebnaya ekspertiza: teoreticheskie, prakticheskie, didakticheskie voprosy: Sborn. nauch. tr. M., 2002.
Kardanov, R.R. Tendentsii razvitiya vozmozhnostey identifikatsionnykh sudebno-ballisticheskikh ekspertiz / R.R. Kardanov // Doklady Adygskoy (CHerkesskoy) Mezhdunarodnoy akademii nauk. 2015. T. 17. № 1.
Kuchmezov, R.A. K voprosu o ponyatii veshchestvennye dokazatel stva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / R.A. Kuchmezov // Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki. 2017. T. 6. № 4.
Kondakov N.I. Logicheskiy slovar . M., 1971.
Rossinskaya E.R. Sovremennye problemy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh poznaniy v sudoproizvodstve // Sudebnaya ekspertiza: teoreticheskie, prakticheskie, didakticheskie voprosy: Sborn. nauch. tr. M., 2002.
Keywords:
expertise, criminalistics, type, research, expert, identification.
