To the question of the grounds for imposing a sentence more lenient than provided for by law (64 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation)
( Pp. 427-430)

More about authors
Gadzhieva Aisha Ansarovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and State Legal Disciplines, (SAEI HE DSUNE)
Dagestan State University of National Economy
Makhachkala, Russian Federation Karaeva Zukhra Shikhshinatovna Postgraduate student of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Dagestan State University, Institute of Law
Dagestan State University of National Economy (SAEI HE DSUNE)
Makhachkala, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The proposed publication raises problems related to the application of the provisions provided for in article 64 of the criminal code of the Russian Federation. Drawing attention to the imperfection of the construction of the studied norm, the authors note the uncertainty of its individual provisions, which in fact "frees the hands" of the judicial authorities and allows them to widely use the "freedom of judicial discretion". The result of judicial will is casuistic norms and excessive liberalization in relation to criminals, which is convincingly confirmed by examples from practice. The study notes that the application of provisions allowing the imposition of a sentence more lenient than provided for by law should be supplemented by an indication of the identity of the perpetrator, in addition, it should be prohibited to apply article 64 in the presence of two or more aggravating circumstances. Taking into account the obtained research results, the authors propose their own formulation of certain provisions specified in the article under study. The purpose of the study was to critically evaluate the norm on the imposition of a sentence more lenient than provided for by law, to identify its shortcomings, to assess how this affects practice and to suggest ways to improve this institution. Method of research. To achieve the research objectives, the following comparative, sociological, historical, statistical methods were used, as well as the method of formal legal logic. Scope of the results. The results of the author's research can be applied in law-making activities aimed at further improvement of criminal legislation, used in judicial practice as suggestions and recommendations, they are also of interest to students at law faculties, can be applied in the educational process.
How to Cite:
Gadzhieva A.A., Karaeva Z.S., (2020), TO THE QUESTION OF THE GROUNDS FOR IMPOSING A SENTENCE MORE LENIENT THAN PROVIDED FOR BY LAW (64 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 427-430.
Reference list:
Kukovyakin A. E. Isklyuchitel nye obstoyatel stva kak osnovanie smyagcheniya nakazaniya: Avtoref. kand. yurid. Nauk. - Omsk, 2018. - S.3
Nikolaeva T.V Naznachenie bolee myagkogo nakazaniya, chem predusmotreno za dannoe prestuplenie: Voprosy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. Dis. k.yu.n.- CHelyabinsk, 2005.- S.7
Opredelenie ot 28 noyabrya 2017g. Delo № 22-888/2017 Elektronnyy resurs // Obzor apellyatsionnoy i kassatsionnoy praktiki Kamchatskogo kraevogo suda po rassmotreniyu ugolovnykh del i inykh materialov za 4-y kvartal 2017 goda // Data obrashcheniya 12.05.2020
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Amurskogo oblastnogo suda ot 04.06.2018 N 44U-27/2018 Prigovor: St. st. 158, 162 UK RF (krazha; razboy) Elektronnyy resurs // http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc base SODV n 117111 Data obrashcheniya 12.05.2020
Stroganova T.YU. Problemy realizatsii spetsial nykh pravil naznacheniya nakazaniya, predusmotrennykh chastyami 2, 4 stat i 62 i stat ey 64 UK RF, v sluchae zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve Elektronnyy resurs //Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i pravo , 2015, t. 25, vyp.1. - S.197-198// https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ problemy-realizatsii-spetsialnyh-pravil-naznacheniya-nakazaniya-predusmotrennyh-chastyami-2-4-stati-62-i-statiey-64-uk-rf-v-sluchae Data obrashcheniya 12.05.2020
Tatsiy V.YA. Voprosy primeneniya stat i 43 UK RFSR // Pravovedenie. -1976.- № 6. - S.108.
Keywords:
below the lowest limit, substitution of punishment, judicial discretion, exceptional circumstances.


Related Articles

PRIVATE LAW (CIVIL) Pages: 75-81 Issue №24067
Compensation for Moral Damage: Theory, Problems of Law Enforcement Practice and Ways of Overcoming them
physical and mental suffering compensation for moral harm judicial discretion rationing Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
Show more
УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВЫЕ НАУКИ (СПЕЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ 5.1.4.) Pages: 158-164 Issue №24320
Lighter Penalties than Prescribed by Law Enforcement: Can Judicial Discretion Be Restricted?
imposition of a lenient sentence exceptional circumstances rules for imposing a mild sentence circumstances that diminish public danger discretionary powers of a judge
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 116-117 Issue №9342
ABOUT THE CRIMINAL-LEGAL POLICY IN THE FIELD OF PROPERTY PROTECTION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
criminal penalties theft judicial discretion interpretive activities
Show more
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REFORMS Pages: 219-220 Issue №10195
The category "judicial discretion" through the prism of a positivistic and natural-legal understanding of law
judicial discretion the judiciary
Show more
15. Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 406-409 Issue №12435
PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR CORPORATE DISPUTES
the arbitration process corporate dispute interim measures security measures in corporate dispute proof
Show more